Phylogenetic Uncertainty and Taxonomic Re-revisions: An Example from the Australian Short-necked Turtles (Testudines: Chelidae)

P Spinks, Arthur GEORGES, H Shaffer

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Molecular data have greatly influenced our concepts of species and their relationships in the last few decades, and as a consequence the taxonomy of most vertebrate clades has been repeatedly revised to reflect phylogeny. However, as larger and more complete molecular data sets become available, the sometimes striking disparities between taxonomic revisions based on individual gene trees (particularly those based on mitochondrial DNA) and species trees has become increasingly apparent. Here, we present data from 13 nuclear and one mitochondrial gene. Our results demonstrate that the recent taxonomic proposal erecting the new Australian chelid genus Flaviemys (Testudines: Chelidae) was an unnecessary action, and that recognition of Flaviemys confuses, rather than clarifies, a phylogeny-based taxonomy of the group. Taxonomic actions have many broad repercussions, and we recommend that taxonomic changes should be proposed cautiously and only when they are based on the strongest possible data and analyses.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)536-540
    Number of pages5
    JournalCopeia
    Volume103
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Fingerprint

    Chelidae
    Testudines
    turtle
    turtles
    uncertainty
    taxonomy
    phylogenetics
    phylogeny
    taxonomic revisions
    mitochondrial DNA
    genes
    gene
    vertebrates
    vertebrate

    Cite this

    @article{11a0d3177ad248eb9fef711de0696247,
    title = "Phylogenetic Uncertainty and Taxonomic Re-revisions: An Example from the Australian Short-necked Turtles (Testudines: Chelidae)",
    abstract = "Molecular data have greatly influenced our concepts of species and their relationships in the last few decades, and as a consequence the taxonomy of most vertebrate clades has been repeatedly revised to reflect phylogeny. However, as larger and more complete molecular data sets become available, the sometimes striking disparities between taxonomic revisions based on individual gene trees (particularly those based on mitochondrial DNA) and species trees has become increasingly apparent. Here, we present data from 13 nuclear and one mitochondrial gene. Our results demonstrate that the recent taxonomic proposal erecting the new Australian chelid genus Flaviemys (Testudines: Chelidae) was an unnecessary action, and that recognition of Flaviemys confuses, rather than clarifies, a phylogeny-based taxonomy of the group. Taxonomic actions have many broad repercussions, and we recommend that taxonomic changes should be proposed cautiously and only when they are based on the strongest possible data and analyses.",
    author = "P Spinks and Arthur GEORGES and H Shaffer",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.1643/CH-14-147",
    language = "English",
    volume = "103",
    pages = "536--540",
    journal = "Coepia",
    issn = "0045-8511",
    publisher = "American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists",
    number = "3",

    }

    Phylogenetic Uncertainty and Taxonomic Re-revisions: An Example from the Australian Short-necked Turtles (Testudines: Chelidae). / Spinks, P; GEORGES, Arthur; Shaffer, H.

    In: Copeia, Vol. 103, No. 3, 2015, p. 536-540.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Phylogenetic Uncertainty and Taxonomic Re-revisions: An Example from the Australian Short-necked Turtles (Testudines: Chelidae)

    AU - Spinks, P

    AU - GEORGES, Arthur

    AU - Shaffer, H

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - Molecular data have greatly influenced our concepts of species and their relationships in the last few decades, and as a consequence the taxonomy of most vertebrate clades has been repeatedly revised to reflect phylogeny. However, as larger and more complete molecular data sets become available, the sometimes striking disparities between taxonomic revisions based on individual gene trees (particularly those based on mitochondrial DNA) and species trees has become increasingly apparent. Here, we present data from 13 nuclear and one mitochondrial gene. Our results demonstrate that the recent taxonomic proposal erecting the new Australian chelid genus Flaviemys (Testudines: Chelidae) was an unnecessary action, and that recognition of Flaviemys confuses, rather than clarifies, a phylogeny-based taxonomy of the group. Taxonomic actions have many broad repercussions, and we recommend that taxonomic changes should be proposed cautiously and only when they are based on the strongest possible data and analyses.

    AB - Molecular data have greatly influenced our concepts of species and their relationships in the last few decades, and as a consequence the taxonomy of most vertebrate clades has been repeatedly revised to reflect phylogeny. However, as larger and more complete molecular data sets become available, the sometimes striking disparities between taxonomic revisions based on individual gene trees (particularly those based on mitochondrial DNA) and species trees has become increasingly apparent. Here, we present data from 13 nuclear and one mitochondrial gene. Our results demonstrate that the recent taxonomic proposal erecting the new Australian chelid genus Flaviemys (Testudines: Chelidae) was an unnecessary action, and that recognition of Flaviemys confuses, rather than clarifies, a phylogeny-based taxonomy of the group. Taxonomic actions have many broad repercussions, and we recommend that taxonomic changes should be proposed cautiously and only when they are based on the strongest possible data and analyses.

    UR - https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.6q6sq

    U2 - 10.1643/CH-14-147

    DO - 10.1643/CH-14-147

    M3 - Article

    VL - 103

    SP - 536

    EP - 540

    JO - Coepia

    JF - Coepia

    SN - 0045-8511

    IS - 3

    ER -