Physiological assessment of isolated running does not directly replicate running capacity after triathlon-specific cycling

Naroa ETXEBARRIA, Julie Hunt, Steve Ingham, Richard A. Ferguson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Triathlon running is affected by prior cycling and power output during triathlon cycling is variable in nature. We compared constant and triathlon-specific variable power cycling and their effect on subsequent submaximal running physiology. Nine well-trained male triathletes (age 24.6 ± 4.6 years, VO_ 2peak 4.5 ± 0.4 L · min-1 ; mean ± SD) performed a submaximal incremental run test, under three conditions: no prior exercise and after a 1 h cycling trial at 65% of maximal aerobic power with either a constant or a variable power profile. The variable power protocol involved multiple 10–90 s intermittent efforts at 40–140% maximal aerobic power. During cycling, pulmonary ventilation (22%, ±14%; mean; ±90% confidence limits), blood lactate (179%, ±48%) and rating of perceived exertion (7.3%, ±10.2%) were all substantially higher during variable than during constant power cycling. At the start of the run, blood lactate was 64%, ±61% higher after variable compared to constant power cycling, which decreased running velocity at 4 mM lactate threshold by 0.6, ±0.9 km · h-1 . Physiological responses to incremental running are negatively affected by prior cycling and, to a greater extent, by variable compared to even-paced cycling. Testing and training of triathletes should account foe higher physiological cost of triathlon-specific cycling and its effect on subsequent running.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)229-238
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Sports Sciences
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Lactic Acid
Pulmonary Ventilation
Costs and Cost Analysis

Cite this

@article{74711ba0a147487ba21d9f8bcba4e369,
title = "Physiological assessment of isolated running does not directly replicate running capacity after triathlon-specific cycling",
abstract = "Triathlon running is affected by prior cycling and power output during triathlon cycling is variable in nature. We compared constant and triathlon-specific variable power cycling and their effect on subsequent submaximal running physiology. Nine well-trained male triathletes (age 24.6 ± 4.6 years, VO_ 2peak 4.5 ± 0.4 L · min-1 ; mean ± SD) performed a submaximal incremental run test, under three conditions: no prior exercise and after a 1 h cycling trial at 65{\%} of maximal aerobic power with either a constant or a variable power profile. The variable power protocol involved multiple 10–90 s intermittent efforts at 40–140{\%} maximal aerobic power. During cycling, pulmonary ventilation (22{\%}, ±14{\%}; mean; ±90{\%} confidence limits), blood lactate (179{\%}, ±48{\%}) and rating of perceived exertion (7.3{\%}, ±10.2{\%}) were all substantially higher during variable than during constant power cycling. At the start of the run, blood lactate was 64{\%}, ±61{\%} higher after variable compared to constant power cycling, which decreased running velocity at 4 mM lactate threshold by 0.6, ±0.9 km · h-1 . Physiological responses to incremental running are negatively affected by prior cycling and, to a greater extent, by variable compared to even-paced cycling. Testing and training of triathletes should account foe higher physiological cost of triathlon-specific cycling and its effect on subsequent running.",
keywords = "cycle-run, stochastic cycling, variable power",
author = "Naroa ETXEBARRIA and Julie Hunt and Steve Ingham and Ferguson, {Richard A.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/02640414.2013.819520",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "229--238",
journal = "Journal of Sports Science",
issn = "0264-0414",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Physiological assessment of isolated running does not directly replicate running capacity after triathlon-specific cycling. / ETXEBARRIA, Naroa; Hunt, Julie; Ingham, Steve; Ferguson, Richard A.

In: Journal of Sports Sciences, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2014, p. 229-238.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Physiological assessment of isolated running does not directly replicate running capacity after triathlon-specific cycling

AU - ETXEBARRIA, Naroa

AU - Hunt, Julie

AU - Ingham, Steve

AU - Ferguson, Richard A.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Triathlon running is affected by prior cycling and power output during triathlon cycling is variable in nature. We compared constant and triathlon-specific variable power cycling and their effect on subsequent submaximal running physiology. Nine well-trained male triathletes (age 24.6 ± 4.6 years, VO_ 2peak 4.5 ± 0.4 L · min-1 ; mean ± SD) performed a submaximal incremental run test, under three conditions: no prior exercise and after a 1 h cycling trial at 65% of maximal aerobic power with either a constant or a variable power profile. The variable power protocol involved multiple 10–90 s intermittent efforts at 40–140% maximal aerobic power. During cycling, pulmonary ventilation (22%, ±14%; mean; ±90% confidence limits), blood lactate (179%, ±48%) and rating of perceived exertion (7.3%, ±10.2%) were all substantially higher during variable than during constant power cycling. At the start of the run, blood lactate was 64%, ±61% higher after variable compared to constant power cycling, which decreased running velocity at 4 mM lactate threshold by 0.6, ±0.9 km · h-1 . Physiological responses to incremental running are negatively affected by prior cycling and, to a greater extent, by variable compared to even-paced cycling. Testing and training of triathletes should account foe higher physiological cost of triathlon-specific cycling and its effect on subsequent running.

AB - Triathlon running is affected by prior cycling and power output during triathlon cycling is variable in nature. We compared constant and triathlon-specific variable power cycling and their effect on subsequent submaximal running physiology. Nine well-trained male triathletes (age 24.6 ± 4.6 years, VO_ 2peak 4.5 ± 0.4 L · min-1 ; mean ± SD) performed a submaximal incremental run test, under three conditions: no prior exercise and after a 1 h cycling trial at 65% of maximal aerobic power with either a constant or a variable power profile. The variable power protocol involved multiple 10–90 s intermittent efforts at 40–140% maximal aerobic power. During cycling, pulmonary ventilation (22%, ±14%; mean; ±90% confidence limits), blood lactate (179%, ±48%) and rating of perceived exertion (7.3%, ±10.2%) were all substantially higher during variable than during constant power cycling. At the start of the run, blood lactate was 64%, ±61% higher after variable compared to constant power cycling, which decreased running velocity at 4 mM lactate threshold by 0.6, ±0.9 km · h-1 . Physiological responses to incremental running are negatively affected by prior cycling and, to a greater extent, by variable compared to even-paced cycling. Testing and training of triathletes should account foe higher physiological cost of triathlon-specific cycling and its effect on subsequent running.

KW - cycle-run

KW - stochastic cycling

KW - variable power

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894318434&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/physiological-assessment-isolated-running-not-directly-replicate-running-capacity-after-triathlonspe

U2 - 10.1080/02640414.2013.819520

DO - 10.1080/02640414.2013.819520

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 229

EP - 238

JO - Journal of Sports Science

JF - Journal of Sports Science

SN - 0264-0414

IS - 3

ER -