Physiological comparison of concentric and eccentric arm cycling in males and females

C.M. Beaven, S.J. Willis, C.J. Cook, H.-C. Holmberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Lower body eccentric exercise is well known to elicit high levels of muscular force with relatively low cardiovascular and metabolic strain. As a result, eccentric exercise has been successfully utilised as an adaptive stressor to improve lower body muscle function in populations ranging from the frail and debilitated, to highly-trained individuals. Here we investigate the metabolic, cardiorespiratory, and energy costs of upper body eccentric exercise in a healthy population. Seven men and seven women performed 4-min efforts of eccentric (ECC) or concentric (CON) arm cycling on a novel arm ergometer at workloads corresponding to 40, 60, and 80% of their peak workload as assessed in an incremental concentric trial. The heart rate, ventilation, cardiac output, respiratory exchange ratio, and blood lactate concentrations were all clearly greater in CON condition at all of the relative workloads (all p<0.003). Effect size calculations demonstrated that the magnitude of the differences in VO2 and work economy between the ECC and CON exercise ranged from very large to extremely large; however, in no case did mechanical efficiency (gMECH) differ between the conditions (all p>0.05). In contrast, delta efficiency (gD), as previously defined by Coyle and colleagues in 1992, demonstrated a sex difference (men>women; p<0.05). Sex differences were also apparent in arteriovenous oxygen difference and heart rate during CON. Here, we reinforce the highforce, low cost attributes of eccentric exercise which can be generalised to the muscles of the upper body. Upper body eccentric exercise is likely to form a useful adjunct in debilitative, rehabilitative, and adaptive clinical exercise programs; however, reports of a shift towards an oxidative phenotype should be taken into consideration by power athletes. We suggest delta efficiency as a sensitive measure of efficiency that allowed the identification of sex differences. © 2014 Beaven et al.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere112079
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalPLoS One
Volume9
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

exercise
Exercise
Muscle
Workload
gender differences
Sex Characteristics
Exercise equipment
Ventilation
Costs
heart rate
Lactic Acid
Blood
Heart Rate
Oxygen
Costs and Cost Analysis
Muscles
muscles
athletes
energy costs
cardiac output

Cite this

Beaven, C. M., Willis, S. J., Cook, C. J., & Holmberg, H-C. (2014). Physiological comparison of concentric and eccentric arm cycling in males and females. PLoS One, 9(11), 1-11. [e112079]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112079
Beaven, C.M. ; Willis, S.J. ; Cook, C.J. ; Holmberg, H.-C. / Physiological comparison of concentric and eccentric arm cycling in males and females. In: PLoS One. 2014 ; Vol. 9, No. 11. pp. 1-11.
@article{a904e54fce91456fab976b92b505361f,
title = "Physiological comparison of concentric and eccentric arm cycling in males and females",
abstract = "Lower body eccentric exercise is well known to elicit high levels of muscular force with relatively low cardiovascular and metabolic strain. As a result, eccentric exercise has been successfully utilised as an adaptive stressor to improve lower body muscle function in populations ranging from the frail and debilitated, to highly-trained individuals. Here we investigate the metabolic, cardiorespiratory, and energy costs of upper body eccentric exercise in a healthy population. Seven men and seven women performed 4-min efforts of eccentric (ECC) or concentric (CON) arm cycling on a novel arm ergometer at workloads corresponding to 40, 60, and 80{\%} of their peak workload as assessed in an incremental concentric trial. The heart rate, ventilation, cardiac output, respiratory exchange ratio, and blood lactate concentrations were all clearly greater in CON condition at all of the relative workloads (all p<0.003). Effect size calculations demonstrated that the magnitude of the differences in VO2 and work economy between the ECC and CON exercise ranged from very large to extremely large; however, in no case did mechanical efficiency (gMECH) differ between the conditions (all p>0.05). In contrast, delta efficiency (gD), as previously defined by Coyle and colleagues in 1992, demonstrated a sex difference (men>women; p<0.05). Sex differences were also apparent in arteriovenous oxygen difference and heart rate during CON. Here, we reinforce the highforce, low cost attributes of eccentric exercise which can be generalised to the muscles of the upper body. Upper body eccentric exercise is likely to form a useful adjunct in debilitative, rehabilitative, and adaptive clinical exercise programs; however, reports of a shift towards an oxidative phenotype should be taken into consideration by power athletes. We suggest delta efficiency as a sensitive measure of efficiency that allowed the identification of sex differences. {\circledC} 2014 Beaven et al.",
author = "C.M. Beaven and S.J. Willis and C.J. Cook and H.-C. Holmberg",
note = "Cited By :2 Export Date: 25 May 2017",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0112079",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "1--11",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "11",

}

Beaven, CM, Willis, SJ, Cook, CJ & Holmberg, H-C 2014, 'Physiological comparison of concentric and eccentric arm cycling in males and females', PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 11, e112079, pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112079

Physiological comparison of concentric and eccentric arm cycling in males and females. / Beaven, C.M.; Willis, S.J.; Cook, C.J.; Holmberg, H.-C.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 9, No. 11, e112079, 2014, p. 1-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Physiological comparison of concentric and eccentric arm cycling in males and females

AU - Beaven, C.M.

AU - Willis, S.J.

AU - Cook, C.J.

AU - Holmberg, H.-C.

N1 - Cited By :2 Export Date: 25 May 2017

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Lower body eccentric exercise is well known to elicit high levels of muscular force with relatively low cardiovascular and metabolic strain. As a result, eccentric exercise has been successfully utilised as an adaptive stressor to improve lower body muscle function in populations ranging from the frail and debilitated, to highly-trained individuals. Here we investigate the metabolic, cardiorespiratory, and energy costs of upper body eccentric exercise in a healthy population. Seven men and seven women performed 4-min efforts of eccentric (ECC) or concentric (CON) arm cycling on a novel arm ergometer at workloads corresponding to 40, 60, and 80% of their peak workload as assessed in an incremental concentric trial. The heart rate, ventilation, cardiac output, respiratory exchange ratio, and blood lactate concentrations were all clearly greater in CON condition at all of the relative workloads (all p<0.003). Effect size calculations demonstrated that the magnitude of the differences in VO2 and work economy between the ECC and CON exercise ranged from very large to extremely large; however, in no case did mechanical efficiency (gMECH) differ between the conditions (all p>0.05). In contrast, delta efficiency (gD), as previously defined by Coyle and colleagues in 1992, demonstrated a sex difference (men>women; p<0.05). Sex differences were also apparent in arteriovenous oxygen difference and heart rate during CON. Here, we reinforce the highforce, low cost attributes of eccentric exercise which can be generalised to the muscles of the upper body. Upper body eccentric exercise is likely to form a useful adjunct in debilitative, rehabilitative, and adaptive clinical exercise programs; however, reports of a shift towards an oxidative phenotype should be taken into consideration by power athletes. We suggest delta efficiency as a sensitive measure of efficiency that allowed the identification of sex differences. © 2014 Beaven et al.

AB - Lower body eccentric exercise is well known to elicit high levels of muscular force with relatively low cardiovascular and metabolic strain. As a result, eccentric exercise has been successfully utilised as an adaptive stressor to improve lower body muscle function in populations ranging from the frail and debilitated, to highly-trained individuals. Here we investigate the metabolic, cardiorespiratory, and energy costs of upper body eccentric exercise in a healthy population. Seven men and seven women performed 4-min efforts of eccentric (ECC) or concentric (CON) arm cycling on a novel arm ergometer at workloads corresponding to 40, 60, and 80% of their peak workload as assessed in an incremental concentric trial. The heart rate, ventilation, cardiac output, respiratory exchange ratio, and blood lactate concentrations were all clearly greater in CON condition at all of the relative workloads (all p<0.003). Effect size calculations demonstrated that the magnitude of the differences in VO2 and work economy between the ECC and CON exercise ranged from very large to extremely large; however, in no case did mechanical efficiency (gMECH) differ between the conditions (all p>0.05). In contrast, delta efficiency (gD), as previously defined by Coyle and colleagues in 1992, demonstrated a sex difference (men>women; p<0.05). Sex differences were also apparent in arteriovenous oxygen difference and heart rate during CON. Here, we reinforce the highforce, low cost attributes of eccentric exercise which can be generalised to the muscles of the upper body. Upper body eccentric exercise is likely to form a useful adjunct in debilitative, rehabilitative, and adaptive clinical exercise programs; however, reports of a shift towards an oxidative phenotype should be taken into consideration by power athletes. We suggest delta efficiency as a sensitive measure of efficiency that allowed the identification of sex differences. © 2014 Beaven et al.

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0112079

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0112079

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 11

M1 - e112079

ER -