Physiotherapy Practice

Opportunities for International Collaboration on Workforce Reforms, Policy and Research

K. Grimmer, J. Morris, S. Kim, S. Milanese, W. Fletcher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Physiotherapy or Physical Therapy (PT) is the most commonly practised allied health discipline globally. International PT workforce reforms are underway to deal with increasing patient numbers, shrinking medical and nursing workforces and lengthy waiting lists. It is timely to consider international differences in PT, with the aims of identifying opportunities for shared learning and forming stronger international alliances to support consistent and evidence-based workforce reforms. Methods: This paper synthesizes freely available information on PT training and service delivery across the UK, Australia and United States (California). The paper considers differences in roles, workplaces, training, legislation and registration, continuing professional development, and accountability. Results: There are similarities between UK, Australia and United States (California) in many areas of PT roles, training, registration, legislation and professional practice. However, none has a standard national mechanism by which to demonstrate PT accountability, patient safety or quality care. Moreover, there are different approaches to workforce reforms. There is considerable duplication in physiotherapy governance. Conclusion: There are opportunities for targeted international collaborations regarding workforce reforms such as extending scope of practice, and determining and implementing internationally agreed ways of demonstrating PT accountability. The findings of this review have significant policy implications, and identify areas for collaborative research.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere1661
JournalPhysiotherapy Research International
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2017

Fingerprint

Physical therapy
Research
Social Responsibility
accountability
Legislation
Therapeutics
legislation
Professional Practice
Waiting Lists
Quality of Health Care
Patient Safety
policy
therapy
workplace
Workplace
Nursing
Patient Care
learning
Learning
safety

Cite this

@article{a664714168a74779b8f17a7c6ba20653,
title = "Physiotherapy Practice: Opportunities for International Collaboration on Workforce Reforms, Policy and Research",
abstract = "Background and Purpose: Physiotherapy or Physical Therapy (PT) is the most commonly practised allied health discipline globally. International PT workforce reforms are underway to deal with increasing patient numbers, shrinking medical and nursing workforces and lengthy waiting lists. It is timely to consider international differences in PT, with the aims of identifying opportunities for shared learning and forming stronger international alliances to support consistent and evidence-based workforce reforms. Methods: This paper synthesizes freely available information on PT training and service delivery across the UK, Australia and United States (California). The paper considers differences in roles, workplaces, training, legislation and registration, continuing professional development, and accountability. Results: There are similarities between UK, Australia and United States (California) in many areas of PT roles, training, registration, legislation and professional practice. However, none has a standard national mechanism by which to demonstrate PT accountability, patient safety or quality care. Moreover, there are different approaches to workforce reforms. There is considerable duplication in physiotherapy governance. Conclusion: There are opportunities for targeted international collaborations regarding workforce reforms such as extending scope of practice, and determining and implementing internationally agreed ways of demonstrating PT accountability. The findings of this review have significant policy implications, and identify areas for collaborative research.",
keywords = "competencies, international comparisons, physiotherapy, scope of practice, Clinical Competence, Health Care Reform, Rehabilitation Research, Humans, Physical Therapy Specialty/education, United Kingdom, International Cooperation, Professional Role, California, Australia, Health Policy",
author = "K. Grimmer and J. Morris and S. Kim and S. Milanese and W. Fletcher",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/pri.1661",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
journal = "Physiotherapy Research International",
issn = "1358-2267",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

Physiotherapy Practice : Opportunities for International Collaboration on Workforce Reforms, Policy and Research. / Grimmer, K.; Morris, J.; Kim, S.; Milanese, S.; Fletcher, W.

In: Physiotherapy Research International, Vol. 22, No. 3, e1661, 01.07.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Physiotherapy Practice

T2 - Opportunities for International Collaboration on Workforce Reforms, Policy and Research

AU - Grimmer, K.

AU - Morris, J.

AU - Kim, S.

AU - Milanese, S.

AU - Fletcher, W.

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - Background and Purpose: Physiotherapy or Physical Therapy (PT) is the most commonly practised allied health discipline globally. International PT workforce reforms are underway to deal with increasing patient numbers, shrinking medical and nursing workforces and lengthy waiting lists. It is timely to consider international differences in PT, with the aims of identifying opportunities for shared learning and forming stronger international alliances to support consistent and evidence-based workforce reforms. Methods: This paper synthesizes freely available information on PT training and service delivery across the UK, Australia and United States (California). The paper considers differences in roles, workplaces, training, legislation and registration, continuing professional development, and accountability. Results: There are similarities between UK, Australia and United States (California) in many areas of PT roles, training, registration, legislation and professional practice. However, none has a standard national mechanism by which to demonstrate PT accountability, patient safety or quality care. Moreover, there are different approaches to workforce reforms. There is considerable duplication in physiotherapy governance. Conclusion: There are opportunities for targeted international collaborations regarding workforce reforms such as extending scope of practice, and determining and implementing internationally agreed ways of demonstrating PT accountability. The findings of this review have significant policy implications, and identify areas for collaborative research.

AB - Background and Purpose: Physiotherapy or Physical Therapy (PT) is the most commonly practised allied health discipline globally. International PT workforce reforms are underway to deal with increasing patient numbers, shrinking medical and nursing workforces and lengthy waiting lists. It is timely to consider international differences in PT, with the aims of identifying opportunities for shared learning and forming stronger international alliances to support consistent and evidence-based workforce reforms. Methods: This paper synthesizes freely available information on PT training and service delivery across the UK, Australia and United States (California). The paper considers differences in roles, workplaces, training, legislation and registration, continuing professional development, and accountability. Results: There are similarities between UK, Australia and United States (California) in many areas of PT roles, training, registration, legislation and professional practice. However, none has a standard national mechanism by which to demonstrate PT accountability, patient safety or quality care. Moreover, there are different approaches to workforce reforms. There is considerable duplication in physiotherapy governance. Conclusion: There are opportunities for targeted international collaborations regarding workforce reforms such as extending scope of practice, and determining and implementing internationally agreed ways of demonstrating PT accountability. The findings of this review have significant policy implications, and identify areas for collaborative research.

KW - competencies

KW - international comparisons

KW - physiotherapy

KW - scope of practice

KW - Clinical Competence

KW - Health Care Reform

KW - Rehabilitation Research

KW - Humans

KW - Physical Therapy Specialty/education

KW - United Kingdom

KW - International Cooperation

KW - Professional Role

KW - California

KW - Australia

KW - Health Policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959019711&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/physiotherapy-practice-opportunities-international-collaboration-workforce-reforms-policy-research

U2 - 10.1002/pri.1661

DO - 10.1002/pri.1661

M3 - Article

VL - 22

JO - Physiotherapy Research International

JF - Physiotherapy Research International

SN - 1358-2267

IS - 3

M1 - e1661

ER -