TY - JOUR
T1 - Physiotherapy practices in the clinical assessment of lateral elbow tendinopathy
T2 - An international survey
AU - Heales, Luke
AU - Vicenzino, Bill
AU - Bisset, Leanne
AU - Bateman, Marcus
AU - Hill, Caitlin
AU - Kean, Crystal
AU - Spyve, Aleesha
AU - Jaques, Ashlee
AU - Sansom, Fergus
AU - Lowe, Michael
AU - Obst, Steven
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to acknowledge the assistance of The New Zealand Physiotherapy Society with distribution of the survey. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Open access publishing facilitated by Central Queensland University, as part of the Wiley - Central Queensland University agreement via the Council of Australian University Librarians.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Physiotherapy Research International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2024/8
Y1 - 2024/8
N2 - Background and Purpose: Understanding physiotherapy practices is important to identify variations from empirical evidence and highlight requirements for training. This survey explored international physiotherapy practices for assessment of lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET). Methods: Two hundred ninety-nine surveyed physiotherapists from eight member countries of the International Federation of Manual and Orthopaedic Physical Therapists completed the survey. Respondents rated their frequency of use (never, rarely, sometimes, often, and always) for items related to: patient history; diagnostic tests; grip and upper limb strength; cervical and neurological assessment; and medical imaging. To establish practices, the five response categories were dichotomised into routine practice (often, always) and not-routine practice (sometimes, rarely, never). A response rate of ≥70% for each dichotomy was used to determine whether an assessment item was deemed routine practice or not, with items not meeting either criterion considered neither routine nor not-routine practice. Results: Most respondents were from United States (63%). The ‘chair pick up test’, ‘cervical special tests’, and ‘plain radiograph’ met our criteria for not routine practice (i.e., 70%, 72%, and 71%, respectively). All other assessment items did not meet the criteria to be considered routine or not-routine practice. Conclusion: The chair pick-up test, cervical spine special tests (e.g., Spurling's test), and plain radiography appear to not be routinely used in the assessment of LET. The finding that no assessment technique met the criteria for routine use may imply that physiotherapists adopt a nuanced approach to selecting clinical assessment items as opposed to routinely applying tests.
AB - Background and Purpose: Understanding physiotherapy practices is important to identify variations from empirical evidence and highlight requirements for training. This survey explored international physiotherapy practices for assessment of lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET). Methods: Two hundred ninety-nine surveyed physiotherapists from eight member countries of the International Federation of Manual and Orthopaedic Physical Therapists completed the survey. Respondents rated their frequency of use (never, rarely, sometimes, often, and always) for items related to: patient history; diagnostic tests; grip and upper limb strength; cervical and neurological assessment; and medical imaging. To establish practices, the five response categories were dichotomised into routine practice (often, always) and not-routine practice (sometimes, rarely, never). A response rate of ≥70% for each dichotomy was used to determine whether an assessment item was deemed routine practice or not, with items not meeting either criterion considered neither routine nor not-routine practice. Results: Most respondents were from United States (63%). The ‘chair pick up test’, ‘cervical special tests’, and ‘plain radiograph’ met our criteria for not routine practice (i.e., 70%, 72%, and 71%, respectively). All other assessment items did not meet the criteria to be considered routine or not-routine practice. Conclusion: The chair pick-up test, cervical spine special tests (e.g., Spurling's test), and plain radiography appear to not be routinely used in the assessment of LET. The finding that no assessment technique met the criteria for routine use may imply that physiotherapists adopt a nuanced approach to selecting clinical assessment items as opposed to routinely applying tests.
KW - diagnosis
KW - lateral epicondylalgia
KW - physical therapy
KW - tennis elbow
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85202012339&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/pri.2125
DO - 10.1002/pri.2125
M3 - Article
C2 - 39180299
AN - SCOPUS:85202012339
SN - 1358-2267
VL - 29
SP - 1
EP - 12
JO - Physiotherapy Research International
JF - Physiotherapy Research International
IS - 4
M1 - e2125
ER -