Policies and Practicalities: Examing the Creative Writing Doctorate

Jeri Kroll, Jennifer Webb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The creative arts disciplines constitute an important growth area for research higher degrees (HDR), and in recent decades they have built a body of knowledge and set of practices associated with them. There is little empirical work, however, which investigates how examiners of creative arts theses arrive at the commentary presented in their reports. This essay debates key issues around the examination of doctoral theses in creative writing. Drawing on their extensive experience in supervising and examining doctorates in the UK and Australia, the authors address issues such as standards, rigour and ethics in examination, examiners’ capacity to evaluate work produced through a range of research methodologies, and the need to understand and apply the often very different policies adopted by individual universities. Examination policies and practices vary, but the flow of students and teachers between countries, and the scarcity of qualified examiners, raise common questions about standards and consistency. Collaborations with both local and overseas colleagues have begun to build knowledge about these similarities and differences, which will be instructive for those of us involved in reviewing policy or shaping practice, and which certainly makes more transparent the diversity in our sector
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)166-178
Number of pages13
JournalNew Writing
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Creative Writing
Creative Arts
Reviewing
Doctoral Thesis
Scarcity

Cite this

@article{efe7a182c4fd4d2e9fefa1fafe6bca2f,
title = "Policies and Practicalities: Examing the Creative Writing Doctorate",
abstract = "The creative arts disciplines constitute an important growth area for research higher degrees (HDR), and in recent decades they have built a body of knowledge and set of practices associated with them. There is little empirical work, however, which investigates how examiners of creative arts theses arrive at the commentary presented in their reports. This essay debates key issues around the examination of doctoral theses in creative writing. Drawing on their extensive experience in supervising and examining doctorates in the UK and Australia, the authors address issues such as standards, rigour and ethics in examination, examiners’ capacity to evaluate work produced through a range of research methodologies, and the need to understand and apply the often very different policies adopted by individual universities. Examination policies and practices vary, but the flow of students and teachers between countries, and the scarcity of qualified examiners, raise common questions about standards and consistency. Collaborations with both local and overseas colleagues have begun to build knowledge about these similarities and differences, which will be instructive for those of us involved in reviewing policy or shaping practice, and which certainly makes more transparent the diversity in our sector",
keywords = "creative writing, doctoral degrees",
author = "Jeri Kroll and Jennifer Webb",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1080/14790726.2012.665930",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "166--178",
journal = "New Writing",
issn = "1479-0726",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

Policies and Practicalities: Examing the Creative Writing Doctorate. / Kroll, Jeri; Webb, Jennifer.

In: New Writing, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2012, p. 166-178.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Policies and Practicalities: Examing the Creative Writing Doctorate

AU - Kroll, Jeri

AU - Webb, Jennifer

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The creative arts disciplines constitute an important growth area for research higher degrees (HDR), and in recent decades they have built a body of knowledge and set of practices associated with them. There is little empirical work, however, which investigates how examiners of creative arts theses arrive at the commentary presented in their reports. This essay debates key issues around the examination of doctoral theses in creative writing. Drawing on their extensive experience in supervising and examining doctorates in the UK and Australia, the authors address issues such as standards, rigour and ethics in examination, examiners’ capacity to evaluate work produced through a range of research methodologies, and the need to understand and apply the often very different policies adopted by individual universities. Examination policies and practices vary, but the flow of students and teachers between countries, and the scarcity of qualified examiners, raise common questions about standards and consistency. Collaborations with both local and overseas colleagues have begun to build knowledge about these similarities and differences, which will be instructive for those of us involved in reviewing policy or shaping practice, and which certainly makes more transparent the diversity in our sector

AB - The creative arts disciplines constitute an important growth area for research higher degrees (HDR), and in recent decades they have built a body of knowledge and set of practices associated with them. There is little empirical work, however, which investigates how examiners of creative arts theses arrive at the commentary presented in their reports. This essay debates key issues around the examination of doctoral theses in creative writing. Drawing on their extensive experience in supervising and examining doctorates in the UK and Australia, the authors address issues such as standards, rigour and ethics in examination, examiners’ capacity to evaluate work produced through a range of research methodologies, and the need to understand and apply the often very different policies adopted by individual universities. Examination policies and practices vary, but the flow of students and teachers between countries, and the scarcity of qualified examiners, raise common questions about standards and consistency. Collaborations with both local and overseas colleagues have begun to build knowledge about these similarities and differences, which will be instructive for those of us involved in reviewing policy or shaping practice, and which certainly makes more transparent the diversity in our sector

KW - creative writing

KW - doctoral degrees

U2 - 10.1080/14790726.2012.665930

DO - 10.1080/14790726.2012.665930

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 166

EP - 178

JO - New Writing

JF - New Writing

SN - 1479-0726

IS - 2

ER -