Policy transfer: Coming of age and learning from the experience

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

    21 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Policy transfer research has been something of a growth industry, reflected in the fact that Google Scholar identifies 17 articles on the subject with more than 100 citations. Of course, as an earlier issue of Policy Studies indicated, the concept and its use have not gone unquestioned. However, the contributors to this volume, for the most part, argue that the study of policy transfer has matured significantly over the last two decades. In order to substantiate this point, we engage here with the article by McCann and Ward which begins this volume. It is an excellent and important example of such a critique, but, in our view, they are a trifle unfair about what they see as the ‘mainstream’, political science approach to the study of policy transfer. As such, we briefly outline McCann and Ward's critique, before considering the later articles in this collection which indicate how these critiques have been, and are being, addressed in the mainstream policy transfer literature. Subsequently, we briefly consider the ontological and epistemological positions which underpin the differences between the approaches of McCann and Ward and the mainstream literature
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)477-481
    Number of pages5
    JournalPolicy Studies
    Volume33
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Fingerprint

    learning
    experience
    policy studies
    search engine
    political science
    industry
    literature

    Cite this

    @article{1aa329630280482aa9ec552c6b067135,
    title = "Policy transfer: Coming of age and learning from the experience",
    abstract = "Policy transfer research has been something of a growth industry, reflected in the fact that Google Scholar identifies 17 articles on the subject with more than 100 citations. Of course, as an earlier issue of Policy Studies indicated, the concept and its use have not gone unquestioned. However, the contributors to this volume, for the most part, argue that the study of policy transfer has matured significantly over the last two decades. In order to substantiate this point, we engage here with the article by McCann and Ward which begins this volume. It is an excellent and important example of such a critique, but, in our view, they are a trifle unfair about what they see as the ‘mainstream’, political science approach to the study of policy transfer. As such, we briefly outline McCann and Ward's critique, before considering the later articles in this collection which indicate how these critiques have been, and are being, addressed in the mainstream policy transfer literature. Subsequently, we briefly consider the ontological and epistemological positions which underpin the differences between the approaches of McCann and Ward and the mainstream literature",
    author = "David Marsh and Mark Evans",
    year = "2012",
    doi = "10.1080/01442872.2012.736795",
    language = "English",
    volume = "33",
    pages = "477--481",
    journal = "Policy Studies",
    issn = "0144-2872",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "6",

    }

    Policy transfer: Coming of age and learning from the experience. / Marsh, David; Evans, Mark.

    In: Policy Studies, Vol. 33, No. 6, 2012, p. 477-481.

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Policy transfer: Coming of age and learning from the experience

    AU - Marsh, David

    AU - Evans, Mark

    PY - 2012

    Y1 - 2012

    N2 - Policy transfer research has been something of a growth industry, reflected in the fact that Google Scholar identifies 17 articles on the subject with more than 100 citations. Of course, as an earlier issue of Policy Studies indicated, the concept and its use have not gone unquestioned. However, the contributors to this volume, for the most part, argue that the study of policy transfer has matured significantly over the last two decades. In order to substantiate this point, we engage here with the article by McCann and Ward which begins this volume. It is an excellent and important example of such a critique, but, in our view, they are a trifle unfair about what they see as the ‘mainstream’, political science approach to the study of policy transfer. As such, we briefly outline McCann and Ward's critique, before considering the later articles in this collection which indicate how these critiques have been, and are being, addressed in the mainstream policy transfer literature. Subsequently, we briefly consider the ontological and epistemological positions which underpin the differences between the approaches of McCann and Ward and the mainstream literature

    AB - Policy transfer research has been something of a growth industry, reflected in the fact that Google Scholar identifies 17 articles on the subject with more than 100 citations. Of course, as an earlier issue of Policy Studies indicated, the concept and its use have not gone unquestioned. However, the contributors to this volume, for the most part, argue that the study of policy transfer has matured significantly over the last two decades. In order to substantiate this point, we engage here with the article by McCann and Ward which begins this volume. It is an excellent and important example of such a critique, but, in our view, they are a trifle unfair about what they see as the ‘mainstream’, political science approach to the study of policy transfer. As such, we briefly outline McCann and Ward's critique, before considering the later articles in this collection which indicate how these critiques have been, and are being, addressed in the mainstream policy transfer literature. Subsequently, we briefly consider the ontological and epistemological positions which underpin the differences between the approaches of McCann and Ward and the mainstream literature

    U2 - 10.1080/01442872.2012.736795

    DO - 10.1080/01442872.2012.736795

    M3 - Editorial

    VL - 33

    SP - 477

    EP - 481

    JO - Policy Studies

    JF - Policy Studies

    SN - 0144-2872

    IS - 6

    ER -