TY - JOUR
T1 - Political Leaders and Public Engagement
T2 - The Hidden World of Informal Elite–Citizen Interaction
AU - Hendriks, Carolyn M.
AU - Lees-Marshment, Jennifer
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: financial support from the Faculty of Arts at the University of Auckland for the interview research presented in this article.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2018.
PY - 2019/8/1
Y1 - 2019/8/1
N2 - To date, practical and scholarly work on participatory and deliberative governance has focused on supply-side issues such as how to engage citizens in public policy. Yet little is known about the demand for public engagement, particularly from those authorised to make collective decisions. This article empirically examines how political leaders view and value public input. It draws on 51 in-depth interviews with senior national ministers from the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the United States. The interviews reveal that leaders value public input because it informs their decisions, connects them to everyday people and ‘tests’ advice from other sources. Their support for participatory governing is, however, qualified; they find formal consultation processes too staged and antagonistic to produce constructive interactions. Instead leaders prefer informal, spontaneous conversations with individual citizens. This hidden world of informal elite–citizen interaction has implications for the design and democratic aspirations of public engagement.
AB - To date, practical and scholarly work on participatory and deliberative governance has focused on supply-side issues such as how to engage citizens in public policy. Yet little is known about the demand for public engagement, particularly from those authorised to make collective decisions. This article empirically examines how political leaders view and value public input. It draws on 51 in-depth interviews with senior national ministers from the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the United States. The interviews reveal that leaders value public input because it informs their decisions, connects them to everyday people and ‘tests’ advice from other sources. Their support for participatory governing is, however, qualified; they find formal consultation processes too staged and antagonistic to produce constructive interactions. Instead leaders prefer informal, spontaneous conversations with individual citizens. This hidden world of informal elite–citizen interaction has implications for the design and democratic aspirations of public engagement.
KW - citizen engagement
KW - deliberative democracy
KW - elected officials
KW - elites
KW - participatory governance
KW - political leaders
KW - politicians
KW - public deliberation
KW - public engagement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052551947&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0032321718791370
DO - 10.1177/0032321718791370
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85052551947
SN - 0032-3217
VL - 67
SP - 597
EP - 617
JO - Political Studies
JF - Political Studies
IS - 3
ER -