Politicisation of the accounting standard-setting process and the influence of key-players: An investigation into the withdrawal of the mandatory status of the Statement of Accounting Concepts No. 4 (SAC 4) in Australia

Jesmin ISLAM, Habib KHAN, Mark HUGHES, Mohobbot Ali

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article aims to develop our understanding of the political activity of groups and individual key-players leading to the withdrawal of the Statement of Accounting Concepts No. 4 (SAC 4). The study also examines the arguments advanced by opponents of this rule, using archival data and semi-structured interviews. The key findings of the study highlight the importance of highly motivated, influential and passionate stakeholders in lobbying against proposed accounting rules. In addition, this event raises interesting questions relating to our understanding of Capture theory. This article shows how key-players within the standard-setting environment interacted with each other and lobbied to bring about the withdrawal of the mandatory status of SAC 4. This study adds to the academic literature by allowing individual key-players to explain their motivations and activities in their own words.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)296-313
Number of pages18
JournalAccounting History
Volume23
Issue number3
Early online date13 Oct 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Accounting standard setting
Politicization
Players
Lobbying
Stakeholders
Structured interview
Political activity
Opponents

Cite this

@article{f3d92edcd10942418c55edb1f88bfb86,
title = "Politicisation of the accounting standard-setting process and the influence of key-players: An investigation into the withdrawal of the mandatory status of the Statement of Accounting Concepts No. 4 (SAC 4) in Australia",
abstract = "This article aims to develop our understanding of the political activity of groups and individual key-players leading to the withdrawal of the Statement of Accounting Concepts No. 4 (SAC 4). The study also examines the arguments advanced by opponents of this rule, using archival data and semi-structured interviews. The key findings of the study highlight the importance of highly motivated, influential and passionate stakeholders in lobbying against proposed accounting rules. In addition, this event raises interesting questions relating to our understanding of Capture theory. This article shows how key-players within the standard-setting environment interacted with each other and lobbied to bring about the withdrawal of the mandatory status of SAC 4. This study adds to the academic literature by allowing individual key-players to explain their motivations and activities in their own words.",
keywords = "accounting standard setting, key-players, lobbying, political influence, SAC 4",
author = "Jesmin ISLAM and Habib KHAN and Mark HUGHES and Mohobbot Ali",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1177/1032373217733811",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "296--313",
journal = "Accounting History",
issn = "1032-3732",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Politicisation of the accounting standard-setting process and the influence of key-players: An investigation into the withdrawal of the mandatory status of the Statement of Accounting Concepts No. 4 (SAC 4) in Australia

AU - ISLAM, Jesmin

AU - KHAN, Habib

AU - HUGHES, Mark

AU - Ali, Mohobbot

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - This article aims to develop our understanding of the political activity of groups and individual key-players leading to the withdrawal of the Statement of Accounting Concepts No. 4 (SAC 4). The study also examines the arguments advanced by opponents of this rule, using archival data and semi-structured interviews. The key findings of the study highlight the importance of highly motivated, influential and passionate stakeholders in lobbying against proposed accounting rules. In addition, this event raises interesting questions relating to our understanding of Capture theory. This article shows how key-players within the standard-setting environment interacted with each other and lobbied to bring about the withdrawal of the mandatory status of SAC 4. This study adds to the academic literature by allowing individual key-players to explain their motivations and activities in their own words.

AB - This article aims to develop our understanding of the political activity of groups and individual key-players leading to the withdrawal of the Statement of Accounting Concepts No. 4 (SAC 4). The study also examines the arguments advanced by opponents of this rule, using archival data and semi-structured interviews. The key findings of the study highlight the importance of highly motivated, influential and passionate stakeholders in lobbying against proposed accounting rules. In addition, this event raises interesting questions relating to our understanding of Capture theory. This article shows how key-players within the standard-setting environment interacted with each other and lobbied to bring about the withdrawal of the mandatory status of SAC 4. This study adds to the academic literature by allowing individual key-players to explain their motivations and activities in their own words.

KW - accounting standard setting

KW - key-players

KW - lobbying

KW - political influence

KW - SAC 4

U2 - 10.1177/1032373217733811

DO - 10.1177/1032373217733811

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 296

EP - 313

JO - Accounting History

JF - Accounting History

SN - 1032-3732

IS - 3

ER -