Politics of anxiety, politics of hope: Penal populism and duterte’s rise to power

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

138 Citations (Scopus)
351 Downloads (Pure)


Citizens who support populist leaders are often portrayed in negative terms. They are disparaged for their prejudice and naiveté, some even earning the label “basket of deplorables” from Hillary Clinton. Rodrigo Duterte’s supporters were not exempted from such criticism. In the 2016 Philippine presidential race, they were pejoratively labelled Dutertards, which pathologised their fervent and unrelenting support for the controversial candidate. This article interrogates such depictions by examining the logics that underpin Duterte’s strong public support. I argue that part of Duterte’s appeal hinges on “penal populism,” built on two political logics that reinforce each other: the politics of anxiety and the politics of hope. While the former foregrounds the language of crisis, danger and uncertainty, the latter reclaims democratic agency. The article examines the articulations of these logics among Duterte’s supporters based on ethnographic fieldwork in disaster-affected communities where Duterte enjoyed decisive victories.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)91-109
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2016
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Politics of anxiety, politics of hope: Penal populism and duterte’s rise to power'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this