Populism and Connectivism

An Analysis of the Sanders and Trump Nomination Campaigns

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    This paper is an analysis of the Trump and Sanders’ campaigns for the presidential nomination of their respective parties. It studies the structure of the relationship between the campaign and its supporters through communication on each candidate’s Facebook page. While both campaigns have been termed populist, we differentiate populism from connectivism and develop an account of a connective campaign as a species of connective action. Whereas populism is predicated on a singular people, connectivity involves the acceptance and recognition of difference as a resource for political activity. Whereas populism involves a hierarchical authority relationship, connectivity is based on a reciprocal authority relationship. Finally, populism articulates an anti-establishment demand while connective campaigns demand for citizens to have the capacity for consequential engagement with political life. The empirical results demonstrate that connectivism and populism are distinct in practice and that these attributes hang together as two separate concepts. Further, we find that Trump’s campaign communications emphasize populist themes, for Sanders such themes are limited and in the shadow of connectivism
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)343-364
    Number of pages23
    JournalJournal of Political Marketing
    Volume16
    Issue number3-4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2017

    Fingerprint

    populism
    campaign
    demand
    facebook
    political activity
    Populism
    communications
    candidacy
    acceptance
    citizen
    communication
    resources

    Cite this

    @article{5a99c4352258488080226b7cf41e697c,
    title = "Populism and Connectivism: An Analysis of the Sanders and Trump Nomination Campaigns",
    abstract = "This paper is an analysis of the Trump and Sanders’ campaigns for the presidential nomination of their respective parties. It studies the structure of the relationship between the campaign and its supporters through communication on each candidate’s Facebook page. While both campaigns have been termed populist, we differentiate populism from connectivism and develop an account of a connective campaign as a species of connective action. Whereas populism is predicated on a singular people, connectivity involves the acceptance and recognition of difference as a resource for political activity. Whereas populism involves a hierarchical authority relationship, connectivity is based on a reciprocal authority relationship. Finally, populism articulates an anti-establishment demand while connective campaigns demand for citizens to have the capacity for consequential engagement with political life. The empirical results demonstrate that connectivism and populism are distinct in practice and that these attributes hang together as two separate concepts. Further, we find that Trump’s campaign communications emphasize populist themes, for Sanders such themes are limited and in the shadow of connectivism",
    author = "Michael JENSEN and Henrik BANG",
    year = "2017",
    doi = "10.1080/15377857.2017.1345846",
    language = "English",
    volume = "16",
    pages = "343--364",
    journal = "Journal of Political Marketing",
    issn = "1537-7857",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "3-4",

    }

    Populism and Connectivism : An Analysis of the Sanders and Trump Nomination Campaigns. / JENSEN, Michael; BANG, Henrik.

    In: Journal of Political Marketing, Vol. 16, No. 3-4, 2017, p. 343-364.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Populism and Connectivism

    T2 - An Analysis of the Sanders and Trump Nomination Campaigns

    AU - JENSEN, Michael

    AU - BANG, Henrik

    PY - 2017

    Y1 - 2017

    N2 - This paper is an analysis of the Trump and Sanders’ campaigns for the presidential nomination of their respective parties. It studies the structure of the relationship between the campaign and its supporters through communication on each candidate’s Facebook page. While both campaigns have been termed populist, we differentiate populism from connectivism and develop an account of a connective campaign as a species of connective action. Whereas populism is predicated on a singular people, connectivity involves the acceptance and recognition of difference as a resource for political activity. Whereas populism involves a hierarchical authority relationship, connectivity is based on a reciprocal authority relationship. Finally, populism articulates an anti-establishment demand while connective campaigns demand for citizens to have the capacity for consequential engagement with political life. The empirical results demonstrate that connectivism and populism are distinct in practice and that these attributes hang together as two separate concepts. Further, we find that Trump’s campaign communications emphasize populist themes, for Sanders such themes are limited and in the shadow of connectivism

    AB - This paper is an analysis of the Trump and Sanders’ campaigns for the presidential nomination of their respective parties. It studies the structure of the relationship between the campaign and its supporters through communication on each candidate’s Facebook page. While both campaigns have been termed populist, we differentiate populism from connectivism and develop an account of a connective campaign as a species of connective action. Whereas populism is predicated on a singular people, connectivity involves the acceptance and recognition of difference as a resource for political activity. Whereas populism involves a hierarchical authority relationship, connectivity is based on a reciprocal authority relationship. Finally, populism articulates an anti-establishment demand while connective campaigns demand for citizens to have the capacity for consequential engagement with political life. The empirical results demonstrate that connectivism and populism are distinct in practice and that these attributes hang together as two separate concepts. Further, we find that Trump’s campaign communications emphasize populist themes, for Sanders such themes are limited and in the shadow of connectivism

    U2 - 10.1080/15377857.2017.1345846

    DO - 10.1080/15377857.2017.1345846

    M3 - Article

    VL - 16

    SP - 343

    EP - 364

    JO - Journal of Political Marketing

    JF - Journal of Political Marketing

    SN - 1537-7857

    IS - 3-4

    ER -