Populism versus neo-liberalism: is there a way forward?

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Populism is a contested concept. In this conclusion we do not want to rehearse these contestations. Rather, we re-emphasize: the extent of the threat that populism poses for liberal democracy; the failure of most mainstream Economists and Political Science to understand the nature of the threat; and the putative ways of renewing democracy
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)251-259
    Number of pages9
    JournalPolicy Studies
    Volume39
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Fingerprint

    populism
    neoliberalism
    threat
    democracy
    political science
    economist

    Cite this

    @article{b8610b0c289642b6bdfe6b83ce95fa08,
    title = "Populism versus neo-liberalism: is there a way forward?",
    abstract = "Populism is a contested concept. In this conclusion we do not want to rehearse these contestations. Rather, we re-emphasize: the extent of the threat that populism poses for liberal democracy; the failure of most mainstream Economists and Political Science to understand the nature of the threat; and the putative ways of renewing democracy",
    keywords = "Populism, neo-liberalism, democracy, everyday makers, political participation",
    author = "Henrik BANG and David MARSH",
    year = "2018",
    doi = "10.1080/01442872.2018.1475641",
    language = "English",
    volume = "39",
    pages = "251--259",
    journal = "Policy Studies",
    issn = "0144-2872",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "3",

    }

    Populism versus neo-liberalism: is there a way forward? / BANG, Henrik; MARSH, David.

    In: Policy Studies, Vol. 39, No. 3, 2018, p. 251-259.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Populism versus neo-liberalism: is there a way forward?

    AU - BANG, Henrik

    AU - MARSH, David

    PY - 2018

    Y1 - 2018

    N2 - Populism is a contested concept. In this conclusion we do not want to rehearse these contestations. Rather, we re-emphasize: the extent of the threat that populism poses for liberal democracy; the failure of most mainstream Economists and Political Science to understand the nature of the threat; and the putative ways of renewing democracy

    AB - Populism is a contested concept. In this conclusion we do not want to rehearse these contestations. Rather, we re-emphasize: the extent of the threat that populism poses for liberal democracy; the failure of most mainstream Economists and Political Science to understand the nature of the threat; and the putative ways of renewing democracy

    KW - Populism

    KW - neo-liberalism

    KW - democracy

    KW - everyday makers

    KW - political participation

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048032870&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/populism-versus-neoliberalism-way-forward

    U2 - 10.1080/01442872.2018.1475641

    DO - 10.1080/01442872.2018.1475641

    M3 - Article

    VL - 39

    SP - 251

    EP - 259

    JO - Policy Studies

    JF - Policy Studies

    SN - 0144-2872

    IS - 3

    ER -