'Portfolios, Departments and Agencies

Tinkering with the Machinery-of-Government Map

Roger Wettenhall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In Australian machinery-of-government terminology, a fairly well settled view of the role of portfolios, departments, ministers and agencies and their inter-relationships has long existed, based on Westminster-system foundations. There have, however, been some challenges to that view in recent years arising from the practice of some government leaders in establishing their new governments, and, in one particular case, a Commission of Audit report. This article looks particularly at how the traditional machinery-of-government understandings have been affected by such new government formations and Commission of Audit reporting. It finds that there has been some innovative 'tinkering' taking place. There is room for speculation as to how much this terminological experimentation will affect actual practice
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)98-116
Number of pages19
JournalAustralasian Parliamentary Review
Volume31
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

audit
speculation
technical language
minister
leader

Cite this

@article{b93d7c1886724f9cb50ff9c2f228cab0,
title = "'Portfolios, Departments and Agencies: Tinkering with the Machinery-of-Government Map",
abstract = "In Australian machinery-of-government terminology, a fairly well settled view of the role of portfolios, departments, ministers and agencies and their inter-relationships has long existed, based on Westminster-system foundations. There have, however, been some challenges to that view in recent years arising from the practice of some government leaders in establishing their new governments, and, in one particular case, a Commission of Audit report. This article looks particularly at how the traditional machinery-of-government understandings have been affected by such new government formations and Commission of Audit reporting. It finds that there has been some innovative 'tinkering' taking place. There is room for speculation as to how much this terminological experimentation will affect actual practice",
author = "Roger Wettenhall",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "98--116",
journal = "Australasian Parliamentary Review",
issn = "0816-9152",
number = "1",

}

'Portfolios, Departments and Agencies : Tinkering with the Machinery-of-Government Map. / Wettenhall, Roger.

In: Australasian Parliamentary Review, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2016, p. 98-116.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'Portfolios, Departments and Agencies

T2 - Tinkering with the Machinery-of-Government Map

AU - Wettenhall, Roger

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - In Australian machinery-of-government terminology, a fairly well settled view of the role of portfolios, departments, ministers and agencies and their inter-relationships has long existed, based on Westminster-system foundations. There have, however, been some challenges to that view in recent years arising from the practice of some government leaders in establishing their new governments, and, in one particular case, a Commission of Audit report. This article looks particularly at how the traditional machinery-of-government understandings have been affected by such new government formations and Commission of Audit reporting. It finds that there has been some innovative 'tinkering' taking place. There is room for speculation as to how much this terminological experimentation will affect actual practice

AB - In Australian machinery-of-government terminology, a fairly well settled view of the role of portfolios, departments, ministers and agencies and their inter-relationships has long existed, based on Westminster-system foundations. There have, however, been some challenges to that view in recent years arising from the practice of some government leaders in establishing their new governments, and, in one particular case, a Commission of Audit report. This article looks particularly at how the traditional machinery-of-government understandings have been affected by such new government formations and Commission of Audit reporting. It finds that there has been some innovative 'tinkering' taking place. There is room for speculation as to how much this terminological experimentation will affect actual practice

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 98

EP - 116

JO - Australasian Parliamentary Review

JF - Australasian Parliamentary Review

SN - 0816-9152

IS - 1

ER -