Abstract
In Australian machinery-of-government terminology, a fairly well settled view of the role of portfolios, departments, ministers and agencies and their inter-relationships has long existed, based on Westminster-system foundations. There have, however, been some challenges to that view in recent years arising from the practice of some government leaders in establishing their new
governments, and, in one particular case, a Commission of Audit report.
This article looks particularly at how the traditional machinery-of-government understandings have been affected by such new government formations and Commission of Audit reporting. It finds that there has been some innovative 'tinkering' taking place. There is room for speculation as to how much this terminological experimentation will affect actual practice
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 98-116 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Australasian Parliamentary Review |
Volume | 31 |
Issue number | 1 |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |