Possession in the law of finding: A comparative study of doctrine of possession

Michael LIU

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Possession requires both physical control and mental intention although the control can mean an access to premises and the intention can mean the knowledge of existence of property in question. In the historical development of theory of possession there have been some doctrinal differences between different schools of thought and different jurisdictions, especially in case of findings. This article examines some doctrinal and jurisdictional differences reflected in the law of finding and concludes that ignorant detention should not be regarded as possession on which a claim can be based.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)211-232
Number of pages22
JournalAustralian Property Law Journal
Volume22
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

possession
doctrine
Law
theory formation
historical development
jurisdiction
school

Cite this

@article{d362b688b7754e2b98c028570e74d4d7,
title = "Possession in the law of finding: A comparative study of doctrine of possession",
abstract = "Possession requires both physical control and mental intention although the control can mean an access to premises and the intention can mean the knowledge of existence of property in question. In the historical development of theory of possession there have been some doctrinal differences between different schools of thought and different jurisdictions, especially in case of findings. This article examines some doctrinal and jurisdictional differences reflected in the law of finding and concludes that ignorant detention should not be regarded as possession on which a claim can be based.",
keywords = "possessions, doctrine of possession",
author = "Michael LIU",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "211--232",
journal = "Australian Property Law Journal",
issn = "1038-5959",
number = "3",

}

Possession in the law of finding: A comparative study of doctrine of possession. / LIU, Michael.

In: Australian Property Law Journal, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2014, p. 211-232.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Possession in the law of finding: A comparative study of doctrine of possession

AU - LIU, Michael

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Possession requires both physical control and mental intention although the control can mean an access to premises and the intention can mean the knowledge of existence of property in question. In the historical development of theory of possession there have been some doctrinal differences between different schools of thought and different jurisdictions, especially in case of findings. This article examines some doctrinal and jurisdictional differences reflected in the law of finding and concludes that ignorant detention should not be regarded as possession on which a claim can be based.

AB - Possession requires both physical control and mental intention although the control can mean an access to premises and the intention can mean the knowledge of existence of property in question. In the historical development of theory of possession there have been some doctrinal differences between different schools of thought and different jurisdictions, especially in case of findings. This article examines some doctrinal and jurisdictional differences reflected in the law of finding and concludes that ignorant detention should not be regarded as possession on which a claim can be based.

KW - possessions

KW - doctrine of possession

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 211

EP - 232

JO - Australian Property Law Journal

JF - Australian Property Law Journal

SN - 1038-5959

IS - 3

ER -