Post-Colonial Public Law

Are Current Legal Establishments Democratically Illegitimate?

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The extant literature covering indigenous peoples resident on the African continent targets colonial law as an obstacle to the recognition of indigenous rights. Whereas colonial law is argued by a wide body of literature to be archaic and in need of review, this article takes a different route and argues the perspective that colonial law is democratically illegitimate for ordering the population it presides over - specifically in Africa. It is seen, in five case studies, that post-colonial public law structures have not considered the legitimacy of colonial law and have rather modified a variety of constitutional statutes as country contexts dictated. However, the modified statutes are based on an alien theoretical legality, something laden with connotations that hark to older and backward times. It is ultimately argued that the legal structures which underpin ex-colonies in Africa need considerable revision so as to base statutes on African theoretical legality, rather than imperialistic European ones, so as to maximise the law’s democratic legitimacy for both indigenous and non-indigenous Africans
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)21-43
    Number of pages23
    JournalAfrican Journal of Legal Studies
    Volume5
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Fingerprint

    public law
    Law
    statute
    legality
    legitimacy
    resident

    Cite this

    @article{362fcde9192d49fc98c42c57761e585d,
    title = "Post-Colonial Public Law: Are Current Legal Establishments Democratically Illegitimate?",
    abstract = "The extant literature covering indigenous peoples resident on the African continent targets colonial law as an obstacle to the recognition of indigenous rights. Whereas colonial law is argued by a wide body of literature to be archaic and in need of review, this article takes a different route and argues the perspective that colonial law is democratically illegitimate for ordering the population it presides over - specifically in Africa. It is seen, in five case studies, that post-colonial public law structures have not considered the legitimacy of colonial law and have rather modified a variety of constitutional statutes as country contexts dictated. However, the modified statutes are based on an alien theoretical legality, something laden with connotations that hark to older and backward times. It is ultimately argued that the legal structures which underpin ex-colonies in Africa need considerable revision so as to base statutes on African theoretical legality, rather than imperialistic European ones, so as to maximise the law’s democratic legitimacy for both indigenous and non-indigenous Africans",
    keywords = "legal theory, colonial law, Africa, democracy, legitimacy",
    author = "Jean-Paul GAGNON",
    year = "2012",
    doi = "10.1163/170873812X626081",
    language = "English",
    volume = "5",
    pages = "21--43",
    journal = "African Journal of Legal Studies",
    issn = "1708-7384",
    publisher = "Brill",
    number = "1",

    }

    Post-Colonial Public Law : Are Current Legal Establishments Democratically Illegitimate? / GAGNON, Jean-Paul.

    In: African Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2012, p. 21-43.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Post-Colonial Public Law

    T2 - Are Current Legal Establishments Democratically Illegitimate?

    AU - GAGNON, Jean-Paul

    PY - 2012

    Y1 - 2012

    N2 - The extant literature covering indigenous peoples resident on the African continent targets colonial law as an obstacle to the recognition of indigenous rights. Whereas colonial law is argued by a wide body of literature to be archaic and in need of review, this article takes a different route and argues the perspective that colonial law is democratically illegitimate for ordering the population it presides over - specifically in Africa. It is seen, in five case studies, that post-colonial public law structures have not considered the legitimacy of colonial law and have rather modified a variety of constitutional statutes as country contexts dictated. However, the modified statutes are based on an alien theoretical legality, something laden with connotations that hark to older and backward times. It is ultimately argued that the legal structures which underpin ex-colonies in Africa need considerable revision so as to base statutes on African theoretical legality, rather than imperialistic European ones, so as to maximise the law’s democratic legitimacy for both indigenous and non-indigenous Africans

    AB - The extant literature covering indigenous peoples resident on the African continent targets colonial law as an obstacle to the recognition of indigenous rights. Whereas colonial law is argued by a wide body of literature to be archaic and in need of review, this article takes a different route and argues the perspective that colonial law is democratically illegitimate for ordering the population it presides over - specifically in Africa. It is seen, in five case studies, that post-colonial public law structures have not considered the legitimacy of colonial law and have rather modified a variety of constitutional statutes as country contexts dictated. However, the modified statutes are based on an alien theoretical legality, something laden with connotations that hark to older and backward times. It is ultimately argued that the legal structures which underpin ex-colonies in Africa need considerable revision so as to base statutes on African theoretical legality, rather than imperialistic European ones, so as to maximise the law’s democratic legitimacy for both indigenous and non-indigenous Africans

    KW - legal theory

    KW - colonial law

    KW - Africa

    KW - democracy

    KW - legitimacy

    U2 - 10.1163/170873812X626081

    DO - 10.1163/170873812X626081

    M3 - Article

    VL - 5

    SP - 21

    EP - 43

    JO - African Journal of Legal Studies

    JF - African Journal of Legal Studies

    SN - 1708-7384

    IS - 1

    ER -