Poverty at the Local Level: National and Small Area Poverty Estimates by Family Type for Australia in 2006

Riyana Miranti, Justine McNamara, Robert Tanton, Ann Harding

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    20 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    There is a substantial literature within Australia examining poverty rates for different family types at the national level. This study presents the first Australian estimates of poverty rates for different types of families at a local level. This paper builds upon the SpatialMSM/08B model, which fuses together data from the 2006 Australian Bureau of Statistics Census of Population and Housing and the 2002–03 and 2003–04 Surveys of Income and Housing. We examine differences in rates of income poverty for lone persons, sole parents, couples and couples with children. The results show that people living by themselves and sole parents have the highest poverty rates. In addition, there are pronounced spatial differences in the poverty rates of people living in different family situations, although the highest poverty rates for all family types tend to be in Australia’s rural areas, with poverty clusters in most of the capital cities
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)145-171
    Number of pages27
    JournalApplied Spatial Analysis and Policy
    Volume4
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Fingerprint

    poverty
    parents
    housing
    income
    family situation
    capital city
    family
    rate
    census
    rural area
    statistics
    human being

    Cite this

    @article{c1552363520543c08a32e8c2e631399a,
    title = "Poverty at the Local Level: National and Small Area Poverty Estimates by Family Type for Australia in 2006",
    abstract = "There is a substantial literature within Australia examining poverty rates for different family types at the national level. This study presents the first Australian estimates of poverty rates for different types of families at a local level. This paper builds upon the SpatialMSM/08B model, which fuses together data from the 2006 Australian Bureau of Statistics Census of Population and Housing and the 2002–03 and 2003–04 Surveys of Income and Housing. We examine differences in rates of income poverty for lone persons, sole parents, couples and couples with children. The results show that people living by themselves and sole parents have the highest poverty rates. In addition, there are pronounced spatial differences in the poverty rates of people living in different family situations, although the highest poverty rates for all family types tend to be in Australia’s rural areas, with poverty clusters in most of the capital cities",
    author = "Riyana Miranti and Justine McNamara and Robert Tanton and Ann Harding",
    year = "2011",
    doi = "10.1007/S12061-010-9049-1",
    language = "English",
    volume = "4",
    pages = "145--171",
    journal = "Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy",
    issn = "1874-4621",
    publisher = "Springer",
    number = "3",

    }

    Poverty at the Local Level: National and Small Area Poverty Estimates by Family Type for Australia in 2006. / Miranti, Riyana; McNamara, Justine; Tanton, Robert; Harding, Ann.

    In: Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2011, p. 145-171.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Poverty at the Local Level: National and Small Area Poverty Estimates by Family Type for Australia in 2006

    AU - Miranti, Riyana

    AU - McNamara, Justine

    AU - Tanton, Robert

    AU - Harding, Ann

    PY - 2011

    Y1 - 2011

    N2 - There is a substantial literature within Australia examining poverty rates for different family types at the national level. This study presents the first Australian estimates of poverty rates for different types of families at a local level. This paper builds upon the SpatialMSM/08B model, which fuses together data from the 2006 Australian Bureau of Statistics Census of Population and Housing and the 2002–03 and 2003–04 Surveys of Income and Housing. We examine differences in rates of income poverty for lone persons, sole parents, couples and couples with children. The results show that people living by themselves and sole parents have the highest poverty rates. In addition, there are pronounced spatial differences in the poverty rates of people living in different family situations, although the highest poverty rates for all family types tend to be in Australia’s rural areas, with poverty clusters in most of the capital cities

    AB - There is a substantial literature within Australia examining poverty rates for different family types at the national level. This study presents the first Australian estimates of poverty rates for different types of families at a local level. This paper builds upon the SpatialMSM/08B model, which fuses together data from the 2006 Australian Bureau of Statistics Census of Population and Housing and the 2002–03 and 2003–04 Surveys of Income and Housing. We examine differences in rates of income poverty for lone persons, sole parents, couples and couples with children. The results show that people living by themselves and sole parents have the highest poverty rates. In addition, there are pronounced spatial differences in the poverty rates of people living in different family situations, although the highest poverty rates for all family types tend to be in Australia’s rural areas, with poverty clusters in most of the capital cities

    U2 - 10.1007/S12061-010-9049-1

    DO - 10.1007/S12061-010-9049-1

    M3 - Article

    VL - 4

    SP - 145

    EP - 171

    JO - Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy

    JF - Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy

    SN - 1874-4621

    IS - 3

    ER -