Practical precooling

Effect on cycling time trial performance in warm conditions

Marc J. Quod, David T. Martin, Paul B. Laursen, Andrew S. Gardner, Shona L. Halson, Frank E. Marino, Margaret P. Tate, David E. Mainwaring, Christopher J. Gore, Allan G. Hahn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of two practical precooling techniques (skin cooling vs. skin + core cooling) on cycling time trial performance in warm conditions. Six trained cyclists completed one maximal graded exercise test ([V̇]O2peak 71.4 ± 3.2 ml · kg-1 · min-1) and four ∼40 min laboratory cycling time trials in a heat chamber (34.3°C ± 1.1°C; 41.2% ± 3.0% rh) using a fixed-power/variable-power format. Cyclists prepared for the time trial using three techniques administered in a randomised order prior to the warm-up: (1) no cooling (control), (2) cooling jacket for 40 min (jacket) or (3) 30-min water immersion followed by a cooling jacket application for 40 min (combined). Rectal temperature prior to the time trial was 37.8°C ± 0.1°C in control, similar in jacket (37.8°C ± 0.3°C) and lower in combined (37.1°C ± 0.2°C, P < 0.01). Compared with the control trial, time trial performance was not different for jacket precooling (-16 ± 36 s, -0.7%; P = 0.35) but was faster for combined precooling (-42 ± 25 s, -1.8%; P = 0.009). In conclusion, a practical combined precooling strategy that involves immersion in cool water followed by the use of a cooling jacket can produce decrease in rectal temperature that persist throughout a warm-up and improve laboratory cycling time trial performance in warm conditions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1477-1487
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Sports Sciences
Volume26
Issue number14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Immersion
Skin
Temperature
Water
Exercise Test
Hot Temperature

Cite this

Quod, M. J., Martin, D. T., Laursen, P. B., Gardner, A. S., Halson, S. L., Marino, F. E., ... Hahn, A. G. (2008). Practical precooling: Effect on cycling time trial performance in warm conditions. Journal of Sports Sciences, 26(14), 1477-1487. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410802298268
Quod, Marc J. ; Martin, David T. ; Laursen, Paul B. ; Gardner, Andrew S. ; Halson, Shona L. ; Marino, Frank E. ; Tate, Margaret P. ; Mainwaring, David E. ; Gore, Christopher J. ; Hahn, Allan G. / Practical precooling : Effect on cycling time trial performance in warm conditions. In: Journal of Sports Sciences. 2008 ; Vol. 26, No. 14. pp. 1477-1487.
@article{38d4f9f7d38b4b2bb143ea061660d8ce,
title = "Practical precooling: Effect on cycling time trial performance in warm conditions",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of two practical precooling techniques (skin cooling vs. skin + core cooling) on cycling time trial performance in warm conditions. Six trained cyclists completed one maximal graded exercise test ([V̇]O2peak 71.4 ± 3.2 ml · kg-1 · min-1) and four ∼40 min laboratory cycling time trials in a heat chamber (34.3°C ± 1.1°C; 41.2{\%} ± 3.0{\%} rh) using a fixed-power/variable-power format. Cyclists prepared for the time trial using three techniques administered in a randomised order prior to the warm-up: (1) no cooling (control), (2) cooling jacket for 40 min (jacket) or (3) 30-min water immersion followed by a cooling jacket application for 40 min (combined). Rectal temperature prior to the time trial was 37.8°C ± 0.1°C in control, similar in jacket (37.8°C ± 0.3°C) and lower in combined (37.1°C ± 0.2°C, P < 0.01). Compared with the control trial, time trial performance was not different for jacket precooling (-16 ± 36 s, -0.7{\%}; P = 0.35) but was faster for combined precooling (-42 ± 25 s, -1.8{\%}; P = 0.009). In conclusion, a practical combined precooling strategy that involves immersion in cool water followed by the use of a cooling jacket can produce decrease in rectal temperature that persist throughout a warm-up and improve laboratory cycling time trial performance in warm conditions.",
keywords = "Cold water immersion, Cooling jacket, Core temperature, Fatigue",
author = "Quod, {Marc J.} and Martin, {David T.} and Laursen, {Paul B.} and Gardner, {Andrew S.} and Halson, {Shona L.} and Marino, {Frank E.} and Tate, {Margaret P.} and Mainwaring, {David E.} and Gore, {Christopher J.} and Hahn, {Allan G.}",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1080/02640410802298268",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "1477--1487",
journal = "Journal of Sports Science",
issn = "0264-0414",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "14",

}

Quod, MJ, Martin, DT, Laursen, PB, Gardner, AS, Halson, SL, Marino, FE, Tate, MP, Mainwaring, DE, Gore, CJ & Hahn, AG 2008, 'Practical precooling: Effect on cycling time trial performance in warm conditions', Journal of Sports Sciences, vol. 26, no. 14, pp. 1477-1487. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410802298268

Practical precooling : Effect on cycling time trial performance in warm conditions. / Quod, Marc J.; Martin, David T.; Laursen, Paul B.; Gardner, Andrew S.; Halson, Shona L.; Marino, Frank E.; Tate, Margaret P.; Mainwaring, David E.; Gore, Christopher J.; Hahn, Allan G.

In: Journal of Sports Sciences, Vol. 26, No. 14, 2008, p. 1477-1487.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practical precooling

T2 - Effect on cycling time trial performance in warm conditions

AU - Quod, Marc J.

AU - Martin, David T.

AU - Laursen, Paul B.

AU - Gardner, Andrew S.

AU - Halson, Shona L.

AU - Marino, Frank E.

AU - Tate, Margaret P.

AU - Mainwaring, David E.

AU - Gore, Christopher J.

AU - Hahn, Allan G.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of two practical precooling techniques (skin cooling vs. skin + core cooling) on cycling time trial performance in warm conditions. Six trained cyclists completed one maximal graded exercise test ([V̇]O2peak 71.4 ± 3.2 ml · kg-1 · min-1) and four ∼40 min laboratory cycling time trials in a heat chamber (34.3°C ± 1.1°C; 41.2% ± 3.0% rh) using a fixed-power/variable-power format. Cyclists prepared for the time trial using three techniques administered in a randomised order prior to the warm-up: (1) no cooling (control), (2) cooling jacket for 40 min (jacket) or (3) 30-min water immersion followed by a cooling jacket application for 40 min (combined). Rectal temperature prior to the time trial was 37.8°C ± 0.1°C in control, similar in jacket (37.8°C ± 0.3°C) and lower in combined (37.1°C ± 0.2°C, P < 0.01). Compared with the control trial, time trial performance was not different for jacket precooling (-16 ± 36 s, -0.7%; P = 0.35) but was faster for combined precooling (-42 ± 25 s, -1.8%; P = 0.009). In conclusion, a practical combined precooling strategy that involves immersion in cool water followed by the use of a cooling jacket can produce decrease in rectal temperature that persist throughout a warm-up and improve laboratory cycling time trial performance in warm conditions.

AB - The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of two practical precooling techniques (skin cooling vs. skin + core cooling) on cycling time trial performance in warm conditions. Six trained cyclists completed one maximal graded exercise test ([V̇]O2peak 71.4 ± 3.2 ml · kg-1 · min-1) and four ∼40 min laboratory cycling time trials in a heat chamber (34.3°C ± 1.1°C; 41.2% ± 3.0% rh) using a fixed-power/variable-power format. Cyclists prepared for the time trial using three techniques administered in a randomised order prior to the warm-up: (1) no cooling (control), (2) cooling jacket for 40 min (jacket) or (3) 30-min water immersion followed by a cooling jacket application for 40 min (combined). Rectal temperature prior to the time trial was 37.8°C ± 0.1°C in control, similar in jacket (37.8°C ± 0.3°C) and lower in combined (37.1°C ± 0.2°C, P < 0.01). Compared with the control trial, time trial performance was not different for jacket precooling (-16 ± 36 s, -0.7%; P = 0.35) but was faster for combined precooling (-42 ± 25 s, -1.8%; P = 0.009). In conclusion, a practical combined precooling strategy that involves immersion in cool water followed by the use of a cooling jacket can produce decrease in rectal temperature that persist throughout a warm-up and improve laboratory cycling time trial performance in warm conditions.

KW - Cold water immersion

KW - Cooling jacket

KW - Core temperature

KW - Fatigue

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57249084096&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02640410802298268

DO - 10.1080/02640410802298268

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 1477

EP - 1487

JO - Journal of Sports Science

JF - Journal of Sports Science

SN - 0264-0414

IS - 14

ER -

Quod MJ, Martin DT, Laursen PB, Gardner AS, Halson SL, Marino FE et al. Practical precooling: Effect on cycling time trial performance in warm conditions. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2008;26(14):1477-1487. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410802298268