Predator control on farmland for biodiversity conservation

A case study from Hawke’s Bay, New Zealand

Alistair S. Glen, Mike Perry, Ivor Yockney, Sam Cave, Andrew M. Gormley, Campbell Leckie, Rod Dickson, Wendy Rakete-Stones, Pouri Rakete-Stones, Grant L. Norbury, Wendy A. Ruscoe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Invasive predator control to protect native fauna usually takes place in native habitat. We investigated the effects of predator control across 6000 ha of multi-tenure, pastoral landscape in Hawke’s Bay, North Island, New Zealand. Since 2011, low-cost predator control has been conducted using a network of kill traps for mustelids (Mustela spp.), and live trapping for feral cats (Felis catus). Although not deliberately targeted, other invasive mammals (particularly hedgehogs Erinaceus europaeus) were also trapped. We monitored predators and native prey in the predator-removal area and an adjacent non-treatment area. Predator populations were monitored using large tracking tunnels, which also detected native lizards. Invertebrates were monitored using artificial shelters (weta houses). Occupancy modelling showed that site use by cats and hedgehogs was significantly lower in the predator-removal area than in the non-treatment area. Site use by mustelids also appeared to be lower in the treatment area, although sample sizes were too small to allow firm conclusions. Site use by invasive rats (Rattus spp.) was higher in the treatment area, while that of house mice (Mus musculus) showed no difference between treatments. There was evidence of positive responses of some native biodiversity, with site use by native lizards increasing significantly in the treatment area, but not in the non-treatment area. Counts of native cockroaches were higher in the treatment area, but other invertebrates were detected in similar numbers in both areas. Our results show that low-cost predator control in a pastoral landscape can reduce invasive predator populations, with apparent benefits for some, but not all, native fauna.

Original languageEnglish
Article number3358
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
JournalNew Zealand Journal of Ecology
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

predator control
agricultural land
predator
biodiversity
case studies
predators
mustelid
Erinaceidae
Mus musculus
lizard
lizards
invertebrate
invertebrates
Erinaceus europaeus
fauna
cats
Mustela
cockroach
Rattus
Blattodea

Cite this

Glen, A. S., Perry, M., Yockney, I., Cave, S., Gormley, A. M., Leckie, C., ... Ruscoe, W. A. (2019). Predator control on farmland for biodiversity conservation: A case study from Hawke’s Bay, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 43(1), 1-7. [3358]. https://doi.org/10.20417/nzjecol.43.8
Glen, Alistair S. ; Perry, Mike ; Yockney, Ivor ; Cave, Sam ; Gormley, Andrew M. ; Leckie, Campbell ; Dickson, Rod ; Rakete-Stones, Wendy ; Rakete-Stones, Pouri ; Norbury, Grant L. ; Ruscoe, Wendy A. / Predator control on farmland for biodiversity conservation : A case study from Hawke’s Bay, New Zealand. In: New Zealand Journal of Ecology. 2019 ; Vol. 43, No. 1. pp. 1-7.
@article{28d8379059774a718dacab64f67f48cd,
title = "Predator control on farmland for biodiversity conservation: A case study from Hawke’s Bay, New Zealand",
abstract = "Invasive predator control to protect native fauna usually takes place in native habitat. We investigated the effects of predator control across 6000 ha of multi-tenure, pastoral landscape in Hawke’s Bay, North Island, New Zealand. Since 2011, low-cost predator control has been conducted using a network of kill traps for mustelids (Mustela spp.), and live trapping for feral cats (Felis catus). Although not deliberately targeted, other invasive mammals (particularly hedgehogs Erinaceus europaeus) were also trapped. We monitored predators and native prey in the predator-removal area and an adjacent non-treatment area. Predator populations were monitored using large tracking tunnels, which also detected native lizards. Invertebrates were monitored using artificial shelters (weta houses). Occupancy modelling showed that site use by cats and hedgehogs was significantly lower in the predator-removal area than in the non-treatment area. Site use by mustelids also appeared to be lower in the treatment area, although sample sizes were too small to allow firm conclusions. Site use by invasive rats (Rattus spp.) was higher in the treatment area, while that of house mice (Mus musculus) showed no difference between treatments. There was evidence of positive responses of some native biodiversity, with site use by native lizards increasing significantly in the treatment area, but not in the non-treatment area. Counts of native cockroaches were higher in the treatment area, but other invertebrates were detected in similar numbers in both areas. Our results show that low-cost predator control in a pastoral landscape can reduce invasive predator populations, with apparent benefits for some, but not all, native fauna.",
keywords = "Feral cat, Invasive predators, Invertebrates, Landscape-scale, Lizards, Mustelids, Rodents",
author = "Glen, {Alistair S.} and Mike Perry and Ivor Yockney and Sam Cave and Gormley, {Andrew M.} and Campbell Leckie and Rod Dickson and Wendy Rakete-Stones and Pouri Rakete-Stones and Norbury, {Grant L.} and Ruscoe, {Wendy A.}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.20417/nzjecol.43.8",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "1--7",
journal = "New Zealand Journal of Ecology",
issn = "0077-9946",
publisher = "New Zealand Ecological Society",
number = "1",

}

Glen, AS, Perry, M, Yockney, I, Cave, S, Gormley, AM, Leckie, C, Dickson, R, Rakete-Stones, W, Rakete-Stones, P, Norbury, GL & Ruscoe, WA 2019, 'Predator control on farmland for biodiversity conservation: A case study from Hawke’s Bay, New Zealand', New Zealand Journal of Ecology, vol. 43, no. 1, 3358, pp. 1-7. https://doi.org/10.20417/nzjecol.43.8

Predator control on farmland for biodiversity conservation : A case study from Hawke’s Bay, New Zealand. / Glen, Alistair S.; Perry, Mike; Yockney, Ivor; Cave, Sam; Gormley, Andrew M.; Leckie, Campbell; Dickson, Rod; Rakete-Stones, Wendy; Rakete-Stones, Pouri; Norbury, Grant L.; Ruscoe, Wendy A.

In: New Zealand Journal of Ecology, Vol. 43, No. 1, 3358, 2019, p. 1-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predator control on farmland for biodiversity conservation

T2 - A case study from Hawke’s Bay, New Zealand

AU - Glen, Alistair S.

AU - Perry, Mike

AU - Yockney, Ivor

AU - Cave, Sam

AU - Gormley, Andrew M.

AU - Leckie, Campbell

AU - Dickson, Rod

AU - Rakete-Stones, Wendy

AU - Rakete-Stones, Pouri

AU - Norbury, Grant L.

AU - Ruscoe, Wendy A.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Invasive predator control to protect native fauna usually takes place in native habitat. We investigated the effects of predator control across 6000 ha of multi-tenure, pastoral landscape in Hawke’s Bay, North Island, New Zealand. Since 2011, low-cost predator control has been conducted using a network of kill traps for mustelids (Mustela spp.), and live trapping for feral cats (Felis catus). Although not deliberately targeted, other invasive mammals (particularly hedgehogs Erinaceus europaeus) were also trapped. We monitored predators and native prey in the predator-removal area and an adjacent non-treatment area. Predator populations were monitored using large tracking tunnels, which also detected native lizards. Invertebrates were monitored using artificial shelters (weta houses). Occupancy modelling showed that site use by cats and hedgehogs was significantly lower in the predator-removal area than in the non-treatment area. Site use by mustelids also appeared to be lower in the treatment area, although sample sizes were too small to allow firm conclusions. Site use by invasive rats (Rattus spp.) was higher in the treatment area, while that of house mice (Mus musculus) showed no difference between treatments. There was evidence of positive responses of some native biodiversity, with site use by native lizards increasing significantly in the treatment area, but not in the non-treatment area. Counts of native cockroaches were higher in the treatment area, but other invertebrates were detected in similar numbers in both areas. Our results show that low-cost predator control in a pastoral landscape can reduce invasive predator populations, with apparent benefits for some, but not all, native fauna.

AB - Invasive predator control to protect native fauna usually takes place in native habitat. We investigated the effects of predator control across 6000 ha of multi-tenure, pastoral landscape in Hawke’s Bay, North Island, New Zealand. Since 2011, low-cost predator control has been conducted using a network of kill traps for mustelids (Mustela spp.), and live trapping for feral cats (Felis catus). Although not deliberately targeted, other invasive mammals (particularly hedgehogs Erinaceus europaeus) were also trapped. We monitored predators and native prey in the predator-removal area and an adjacent non-treatment area. Predator populations were monitored using large tracking tunnels, which also detected native lizards. Invertebrates were monitored using artificial shelters (weta houses). Occupancy modelling showed that site use by cats and hedgehogs was significantly lower in the predator-removal area than in the non-treatment area. Site use by mustelids also appeared to be lower in the treatment area, although sample sizes were too small to allow firm conclusions. Site use by invasive rats (Rattus spp.) was higher in the treatment area, while that of house mice (Mus musculus) showed no difference between treatments. There was evidence of positive responses of some native biodiversity, with site use by native lizards increasing significantly in the treatment area, but not in the non-treatment area. Counts of native cockroaches were higher in the treatment area, but other invertebrates were detected in similar numbers in both areas. Our results show that low-cost predator control in a pastoral landscape can reduce invasive predator populations, with apparent benefits for some, but not all, native fauna.

KW - Feral cat

KW - Invasive predators

KW - Invertebrates

KW - Landscape-scale

KW - Lizards

KW - Mustelids

KW - Rodents

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061003211&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.20417/nzjecol.43.8

DO - 10.20417/nzjecol.43.8

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 1

EP - 7

JO - New Zealand Journal of Ecology

JF - New Zealand Journal of Ecology

SN - 0077-9946

IS - 1

M1 - 3358

ER -