Predicting habitat response to flow using generalized habitat models for trout in Rocky Mountain streams

T.K. Wilding, B.P. Bledsoe, LeRoy POFF, Barbara J S Sanderson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    14 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Dams and water diversions can dramatically alter the hydraulic habitats of stream ecosystems. Predicting how water depth and velocity respond to flow alteration is possible using hydraulic models, such as Physical Habitat Simulation (PHABSIM); however, such models are expensive to implement and typically describe only a short length of stream (10 2m). If science is to keep pace with development, then more rapid and cost-effective models are needed. We developed a generalized habitat model (GHM) for brown and rainbow trout that makes similar predictions to PHABSIM models but offers a demonstrated reduction in survey effort for Colorado Rocky Mountain streams. This model combines the best features of GHMs developed elsewhere, including the options of desktop (no-survey) or rapid-survey models. Habitat-flow curves produced by PHABSIM were simplified to just two site-specific components: (i) Q95h (flow at 95% of maximum habitat) and (ii) Shape. The Shape component describes the habitat-flow curves made dimensionless by dividing flow increments by Q95h and dividing habitat (weighted usable area) increments by maximum habitat. Both components were predicted from desktop variables, including mean annual flow, using linear regression. The rapid-survey GHM produced better predictions of observed habitat than the desktop GHM (rapid-survey model explained 82-89% variance for independent validation sites; desktop 68-85%). The predictive success of these GHMs was similar to other published models, but survey effort to achieve that success was substantially reduced. Habitat predicted by the desktop GHM (using geographic information system data) was significantly correlated with the abundance of large brown trout (p<0.01) but not smaller trout.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)805-824
    Number of pages20
    JournalRiver Research and Applications
    Volume30
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    mountain stream
    habitat
    Hydraulic models
    Water
    simulation
    hydraulics
    Linear regression
    Ecosystems
    Geographic information systems
    Dams
    prediction
    Hydraulics
    rainbow

    Cite this

    Wilding, T.K. ; Bledsoe, B.P. ; POFF, LeRoy ; Sanderson, Barbara J S. / Predicting habitat response to flow using generalized habitat models for trout in Rocky Mountain streams. In: River Research and Applications. 2014 ; Vol. 30, No. 7. pp. 805-824.
    @article{dede85174e2444338dc73a047acfc0db,
    title = "Predicting habitat response to flow using generalized habitat models for trout in Rocky Mountain streams",
    abstract = "Dams and water diversions can dramatically alter the hydraulic habitats of stream ecosystems. Predicting how water depth and velocity respond to flow alteration is possible using hydraulic models, such as Physical Habitat Simulation (PHABSIM); however, such models are expensive to implement and typically describe only a short length of stream (10 2m). If science is to keep pace with development, then more rapid and cost-effective models are needed. We developed a generalized habitat model (GHM) for brown and rainbow trout that makes similar predictions to PHABSIM models but offers a demonstrated reduction in survey effort for Colorado Rocky Mountain streams. This model combines the best features of GHMs developed elsewhere, including the options of desktop (no-survey) or rapid-survey models. Habitat-flow curves produced by PHABSIM were simplified to just two site-specific components: (i) Q95h (flow at 95{\%} of maximum habitat) and (ii) Shape. The Shape component describes the habitat-flow curves made dimensionless by dividing flow increments by Q95h and dividing habitat (weighted usable area) increments by maximum habitat. Both components were predicted from desktop variables, including mean annual flow, using linear regression. The rapid-survey GHM produced better predictions of observed habitat than the desktop GHM (rapid-survey model explained 82-89{\%} variance for independent validation sites; desktop 68-85{\%}). The predictive success of these GHMs was similar to other published models, but survey effort to achieve that success was substantially reduced. Habitat predicted by the desktop GHM (using geographic information system data) was significantly correlated with the abundance of large brown trout (p<0.01) but not smaller trout.",
    keywords = "Depth, Generalized habitat model, Habitat, PHABSIM, Rocky Mountains, Trout, Velocity, depth, habitat, generalized habitat model, trout, velocity",
    author = "T.K. Wilding and B.P. Bledsoe and LeRoy POFF and Sanderson, {Barbara J S}",
    note = "cited By 4",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1002/rra.2678",
    language = "English",
    volume = "30",
    pages = "805--824",
    journal = "River Research and Applications",
    issn = "0886-9375",
    publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
    number = "7",

    }

    Predicting habitat response to flow using generalized habitat models for trout in Rocky Mountain streams. / Wilding, T.K.; Bledsoe, B.P.; POFF, LeRoy; Sanderson, Barbara J S.

    In: River Research and Applications, Vol. 30, No. 7, 2014, p. 805-824.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Predicting habitat response to flow using generalized habitat models for trout in Rocky Mountain streams

    AU - Wilding, T.K.

    AU - Bledsoe, B.P.

    AU - POFF, LeRoy

    AU - Sanderson, Barbara J S

    N1 - cited By 4

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - Dams and water diversions can dramatically alter the hydraulic habitats of stream ecosystems. Predicting how water depth and velocity respond to flow alteration is possible using hydraulic models, such as Physical Habitat Simulation (PHABSIM); however, such models are expensive to implement and typically describe only a short length of stream (10 2m). If science is to keep pace with development, then more rapid and cost-effective models are needed. We developed a generalized habitat model (GHM) for brown and rainbow trout that makes similar predictions to PHABSIM models but offers a demonstrated reduction in survey effort for Colorado Rocky Mountain streams. This model combines the best features of GHMs developed elsewhere, including the options of desktop (no-survey) or rapid-survey models. Habitat-flow curves produced by PHABSIM were simplified to just two site-specific components: (i) Q95h (flow at 95% of maximum habitat) and (ii) Shape. The Shape component describes the habitat-flow curves made dimensionless by dividing flow increments by Q95h and dividing habitat (weighted usable area) increments by maximum habitat. Both components were predicted from desktop variables, including mean annual flow, using linear regression. The rapid-survey GHM produced better predictions of observed habitat than the desktop GHM (rapid-survey model explained 82-89% variance for independent validation sites; desktop 68-85%). The predictive success of these GHMs was similar to other published models, but survey effort to achieve that success was substantially reduced. Habitat predicted by the desktop GHM (using geographic information system data) was significantly correlated with the abundance of large brown trout (p<0.01) but not smaller trout.

    AB - Dams and water diversions can dramatically alter the hydraulic habitats of stream ecosystems. Predicting how water depth and velocity respond to flow alteration is possible using hydraulic models, such as Physical Habitat Simulation (PHABSIM); however, such models are expensive to implement and typically describe only a short length of stream (10 2m). If science is to keep pace with development, then more rapid and cost-effective models are needed. We developed a generalized habitat model (GHM) for brown and rainbow trout that makes similar predictions to PHABSIM models but offers a demonstrated reduction in survey effort for Colorado Rocky Mountain streams. This model combines the best features of GHMs developed elsewhere, including the options of desktop (no-survey) or rapid-survey models. Habitat-flow curves produced by PHABSIM were simplified to just two site-specific components: (i) Q95h (flow at 95% of maximum habitat) and (ii) Shape. The Shape component describes the habitat-flow curves made dimensionless by dividing flow increments by Q95h and dividing habitat (weighted usable area) increments by maximum habitat. Both components were predicted from desktop variables, including mean annual flow, using linear regression. The rapid-survey GHM produced better predictions of observed habitat than the desktop GHM (rapid-survey model explained 82-89% variance for independent validation sites; desktop 68-85%). The predictive success of these GHMs was similar to other published models, but survey effort to achieve that success was substantially reduced. Habitat predicted by the desktop GHM (using geographic information system data) was significantly correlated with the abundance of large brown trout (p<0.01) but not smaller trout.

    KW - Depth

    KW - Generalized habitat model

    KW - Habitat

    KW - PHABSIM

    KW - Rocky Mountains

    KW - Trout

    KW - Velocity

    KW - depth

    KW - habitat

    KW - generalized habitat model

    KW - trout

    KW - velocity

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908480461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/predicting-habitat-response-flow-using-generalized-habitat-models-trout-rocky-mountain-streams

    U2 - 10.1002/rra.2678

    DO - 10.1002/rra.2678

    M3 - Article

    VL - 30

    SP - 805

    EP - 824

    JO - River Research and Applications

    JF - River Research and Applications

    SN - 0886-9375

    IS - 7

    ER -