Predicting Reference Assemblages for Freshwater Bioassessment with limiting Environmental Difference Analysis

Bruce Chessman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The status of biological assemblages is often inferred by comparing observational assemblage data with reference data generated by a predictive model. Limiting environmental difference analysis (LEDA) applies the ecological concepts of distance decay of similarity and limiting factor theory to model reference data by extrapolation from samples collected at reference sites. I applied LEDA modeling to data sets from the Australian Capital Territory (ACT), Laurentian Great Lakes (GL), and Canadian Yukon Territory (YT) to test its accuracy and precision in predicting the composition of benthic macroinvertebrate samples from reference sites, and its specificity and sensitivity in detecting mathematically simulated human impacts on sample composition. LEDA models were significantly and substantially more accurate than null models for all 3 data sets, but not significantly more precise. They mostly assessed unimpacted samples correctly but seldom detected mild simulated impacts. However, they often detected moderate and usually detected severe impacts. Model performance for the test data sets probably was constrained by limitations of the environmental predictor variables and low taxonomic richness in many samples. The simulated impacts provided insight into model behavior but were limited in their scope and realism. I suggest that future simulations should separately test detection of different kinds of assemblage change, not only different intensities, and should address the consequences of human alteration of predictor variables.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1261-1271
Number of pages11
JournalFreshwater Science
Volume33
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

biological assessment
sampling
Australian Capital Territory
Yukon Territory
anthropogenic effect
testing
limiting factor
macroinvertebrate
Great Lakes
analysis
macroinvertebrates
anthropogenic activities
deterioration
lake
environmental factors
modeling
simulation
test

Cite this

@article{35ab2fc5366c40329154f7c9880bd6d6,
title = "Predicting Reference Assemblages for Freshwater Bioassessment with limiting Environmental Difference Analysis",
abstract = "The status of biological assemblages is often inferred by comparing observational assemblage data with reference data generated by a predictive model. Limiting environmental difference analysis (LEDA) applies the ecological concepts of distance decay of similarity and limiting factor theory to model reference data by extrapolation from samples collected at reference sites. I applied LEDA modeling to data sets from the Australian Capital Territory (ACT), Laurentian Great Lakes (GL), and Canadian Yukon Territory (YT) to test its accuracy and precision in predicting the composition of benthic macroinvertebrate samples from reference sites, and its specificity and sensitivity in detecting mathematically simulated human impacts on sample composition. LEDA models were significantly and substantially more accurate than null models for all 3 data sets, but not significantly more precise. They mostly assessed unimpacted samples correctly but seldom detected mild simulated impacts. However, they often detected moderate and usually detected severe impacts. Model performance for the test data sets probably was constrained by limitations of the environmental predictor variables and low taxonomic richness in many samples. The simulated impacts provided insight into model behavior but were limited in their scope and realism. I suggest that future simulations should separately test detection of different kinds of assemblage change, not only different intensities, and should address the consequences of human alteration of predictor variables.",
keywords = "bioassessment, freshwater, limiting factor, macroinvertebrate, predictive model",
author = "Bruce Chessman",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1086/678701",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "1261--1271",
journal = "Journal of the North American Benthological Society",
issn = "2161-9565",
publisher = "The Society for Freshwater Science",
number = "4",

}

Predicting Reference Assemblages for Freshwater Bioassessment with limiting Environmental Difference Analysis. / Chessman, Bruce.

In: Freshwater Science, Vol. 33, No. 4, 2014, p. 1261-1271.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predicting Reference Assemblages for Freshwater Bioassessment with limiting Environmental Difference Analysis

AU - Chessman, Bruce

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The status of biological assemblages is often inferred by comparing observational assemblage data with reference data generated by a predictive model. Limiting environmental difference analysis (LEDA) applies the ecological concepts of distance decay of similarity and limiting factor theory to model reference data by extrapolation from samples collected at reference sites. I applied LEDA modeling to data sets from the Australian Capital Territory (ACT), Laurentian Great Lakes (GL), and Canadian Yukon Territory (YT) to test its accuracy and precision in predicting the composition of benthic macroinvertebrate samples from reference sites, and its specificity and sensitivity in detecting mathematically simulated human impacts on sample composition. LEDA models were significantly and substantially more accurate than null models for all 3 data sets, but not significantly more precise. They mostly assessed unimpacted samples correctly but seldom detected mild simulated impacts. However, they often detected moderate and usually detected severe impacts. Model performance for the test data sets probably was constrained by limitations of the environmental predictor variables and low taxonomic richness in many samples. The simulated impacts provided insight into model behavior but were limited in their scope and realism. I suggest that future simulations should separately test detection of different kinds of assemblage change, not only different intensities, and should address the consequences of human alteration of predictor variables.

AB - The status of biological assemblages is often inferred by comparing observational assemblage data with reference data generated by a predictive model. Limiting environmental difference analysis (LEDA) applies the ecological concepts of distance decay of similarity and limiting factor theory to model reference data by extrapolation from samples collected at reference sites. I applied LEDA modeling to data sets from the Australian Capital Territory (ACT), Laurentian Great Lakes (GL), and Canadian Yukon Territory (YT) to test its accuracy and precision in predicting the composition of benthic macroinvertebrate samples from reference sites, and its specificity and sensitivity in detecting mathematically simulated human impacts on sample composition. LEDA models were significantly and substantially more accurate than null models for all 3 data sets, but not significantly more precise. They mostly assessed unimpacted samples correctly but seldom detected mild simulated impacts. However, they often detected moderate and usually detected severe impacts. Model performance for the test data sets probably was constrained by limitations of the environmental predictor variables and low taxonomic richness in many samples. The simulated impacts provided insight into model behavior but were limited in their scope and realism. I suggest that future simulations should separately test detection of different kinds of assemblage change, not only different intensities, and should address the consequences of human alteration of predictor variables.

KW - bioassessment

KW - freshwater

KW - limiting factor

KW - macroinvertebrate

KW - predictive model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940035848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/predicting-reference-assemblages-freshwater-bioassessment-limiting-environmental-difference-analysis

U2 - 10.1086/678701

DO - 10.1086/678701

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 1261

EP - 1271

JO - Journal of the North American Benthological Society

JF - Journal of the North American Benthological Society

SN - 2161-9565

IS - 4

ER -