TY - JOUR
T1 - Proof of Concept of Automated Collision Detection Technology in Rugby Sevens
AU - Clarke, Anthea
AU - Anson, Judith
AU - Pyne, David
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Clarke, AC, Anson, JM, and Pyne, DB. Proof of concept of automated collision detection technology in rugby sevens. J Strength Cond Res 31(4): 1116-1120, 2017-Developments in microsensor technology allow for automated detection of collisions in various codes of football, removing the need for time-consuming postprocessing of video footage. However, little research is available on the ability of microsensor technology to be used across various sports or genders. Game video footage was matched with microsensor-detected collisions (GPSports) in one men's (n = 12 players) and one women's (n = 12) rugby sevens match. True-positive, false-positive, and false-negative events between video and microsensor-detected collisions were used to calculate recall (ability to detect a collision) and precision (accurately identify a collision). The precision was similar between the men's and women's rugby sevens game (∼0.72; scale 0.00-1.00); however, the recall in the women's game (0.45) was less than that for the men's game (0.69). This resulted in 45% of collisions for men and 62% of collisions for women being incorrectly labeled. Currently, the automated collision detection system in GPSports microtechnology units has only modest utility in rugby sevens, and it seems that a rugby sevens-specific algorithm is needed. Differences in measures between the men's and women's game may be a result of physical size, and strength, and physicality, as well as technical and tactical factors.
AB - Clarke, AC, Anson, JM, and Pyne, DB. Proof of concept of automated collision detection technology in rugby sevens. J Strength Cond Res 31(4): 1116-1120, 2017-Developments in microsensor technology allow for automated detection of collisions in various codes of football, removing the need for time-consuming postprocessing of video footage. However, little research is available on the ability of microsensor technology to be used across various sports or genders. Game video footage was matched with microsensor-detected collisions (GPSports) in one men's (n = 12 players) and one women's (n = 12) rugby sevens match. True-positive, false-positive, and false-negative events between video and microsensor-detected collisions were used to calculate recall (ability to detect a collision) and precision (accurately identify a collision). The precision was similar between the men's and women's rugby sevens game (∼0.72; scale 0.00-1.00); however, the recall in the women's game (0.45) was less than that for the men's game (0.69). This resulted in 45% of collisions for men and 62% of collisions for women being incorrectly labeled. Currently, the automated collision detection system in GPSports microtechnology units has only modest utility in rugby sevens, and it seems that a rugby sevens-specific algorithm is needed. Differences in measures between the men's and women's game may be a result of physical size, and strength, and physicality, as well as technical and tactical factors.
KW - Adult
KW - Female
KW - Football
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Microtechnology
KW - Monitoring, Ambulatory
KW - Reproducibility of Results
KW - Young Adult
KW - Journal Article
KW - GPS
KW - football
KW - impacts
KW - microsensor technology
KW - women
KW - Monitoring, Ambulatory/instrumentation
KW - Microtechnology/instrumentation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016796040&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/proof-concept-automated-collision-detection-technology-rugby-sevens
U2 - 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001576
DO - 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001576
M3 - Article
C2 - 27467515
SN - 1533-4287
VL - 31
SP - 1116
EP - 1120
JO - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
JF - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
IS - 4
ER -