Proposal to disregard athletics world records prior to 2005: a radical and misjudged initiative

Andrew Mark Edwards, Andrew M Jones, David B Pyne

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The recent announcement that the European Athletics Council has proposed to disregard all athletics world records set prior to 20051 has caused considerable controversy and debate among the athletics community. It is a radical initiative with commendable aims to redress the consequences of past undetected doping violations that may have led to some of the least attainable world records. This proposal has now been put to the world governing body, the International Amateur Athletics Federation (IAAF), and its merits require discussion. A major suggested justification for the proposal is that the IAAF has stored blood and urine samples only since 2005. As a consequence, there is limited recourse to disprove the legitimacy of performances prior to 2005 unless compelling new corroborative evidence emerges, as was the case for the cyclist Lance Armstrong. This seems unlikely when conclusive evidence of doping and admissions of guilt are not forthcoming despite widely known practices of state-sponsored doping.2 Therefore, the proposal has some merit for expunction of world records that may have been set with the aid of illegal performance-enhancing drugs. Nevertheless, there are many …
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1071-1072
Number of pages3
JournalBritish Journal of Sports Medicine
Volume52
Issue number16
Early online date7 Dec 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2018

Fingerprint

Sports
Performance-Enhancing Substances
Illegitimacy
Guilt
Urine

Cite this

@article{b32d2327337643f6952cef274c1dd580,
title = "Proposal to disregard athletics world records prior to 2005: a radical and misjudged initiative",
abstract = "The recent announcement that the European Athletics Council has proposed to disregard all athletics world records set prior to 20051 has caused considerable controversy and debate among the athletics community. It is a radical initiative with commendable aims to redress the consequences of past undetected doping violations that may have led to some of the least attainable world records. This proposal has now been put to the world governing body, the International Amateur Athletics Federation (IAAF), and its merits require discussion. A major suggested justification for the proposal is that the IAAF has stored blood and urine samples only since 2005. As a consequence, there is limited recourse to disprove the legitimacy of performances prior to 2005 unless compelling new corroborative evidence emerges, as was the case for the cyclist Lance Armstrong. This seems unlikely when conclusive evidence of doping and admissions of guilt are not forthcoming despite widely known practices of state-sponsored doping.2 Therefore, the proposal has some merit for expunction of world records that may have been set with the aid of illegal performance-enhancing drugs. Nevertheless, there are many …",
keywords = "Athletics, Doping, Drug use",
author = "Edwards, {Andrew Mark} and Jones, {Andrew M} and Pyne, {David B}",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1136/bjsports-2017-098307",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "1071--1072",
journal = "British Journal of Sports Medicine",
issn = "0306-3674",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "16",

}

Proposal to disregard athletics world records prior to 2005: a radical and misjudged initiative. / Edwards, Andrew Mark; Jones, Andrew M; Pyne, David B.

In: British Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol. 52, No. 16, 08.2018, p. 1071-1072.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

TY - JOUR

T1 - Proposal to disregard athletics world records prior to 2005: a radical and misjudged initiative

AU - Edwards, Andrew Mark

AU - Jones, Andrew M

AU - Pyne, David B

PY - 2018/8

Y1 - 2018/8

N2 - The recent announcement that the European Athletics Council has proposed to disregard all athletics world records set prior to 20051 has caused considerable controversy and debate among the athletics community. It is a radical initiative with commendable aims to redress the consequences of past undetected doping violations that may have led to some of the least attainable world records. This proposal has now been put to the world governing body, the International Amateur Athletics Federation (IAAF), and its merits require discussion. A major suggested justification for the proposal is that the IAAF has stored blood and urine samples only since 2005. As a consequence, there is limited recourse to disprove the legitimacy of performances prior to 2005 unless compelling new corroborative evidence emerges, as was the case for the cyclist Lance Armstrong. This seems unlikely when conclusive evidence of doping and admissions of guilt are not forthcoming despite widely known practices of state-sponsored doping.2 Therefore, the proposal has some merit for expunction of world records that may have been set with the aid of illegal performance-enhancing drugs. Nevertheless, there are many …

AB - The recent announcement that the European Athletics Council has proposed to disregard all athletics world records set prior to 20051 has caused considerable controversy and debate among the athletics community. It is a radical initiative with commendable aims to redress the consequences of past undetected doping violations that may have led to some of the least attainable world records. This proposal has now been put to the world governing body, the International Amateur Athletics Federation (IAAF), and its merits require discussion. A major suggested justification for the proposal is that the IAAF has stored blood and urine samples only since 2005. As a consequence, there is limited recourse to disprove the legitimacy of performances prior to 2005 unless compelling new corroborative evidence emerges, as was the case for the cyclist Lance Armstrong. This seems unlikely when conclusive evidence of doping and admissions of guilt are not forthcoming despite widely known practices of state-sponsored doping.2 Therefore, the proposal has some merit for expunction of world records that may have been set with the aid of illegal performance-enhancing drugs. Nevertheless, there are many …

KW - Athletics

KW - Doping

KW - Drug use

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049194312&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098307

DO - 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098307

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 52

SP - 1071

EP - 1072

JO - British Journal of Sports Medicine

JF - British Journal of Sports Medicine

SN - 0306-3674

IS - 16

ER -