Proposal to disregard athletics world records prior to 2005: a radical and misjudged initiative

Andrew Mark Edwards, Andrew M Jones, David B Pyne

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The recent announcement that the European Athletics Council has proposed to disregard all athletics world records set prior to 20051 has caused considerable controversy and debate among the athletics community. It is a radical initiative with commendable aims to redress the consequences of past undetected doping violations that may have led to some of the least attainable world records. This proposal has now been put to the world governing body, the International Amateur Athletics Federation (IAAF), and its merits require discussion. A major suggested justification for the proposal is that the IAAF has stored blood and urine samples only since 2005. As a consequence, there is limited recourse to disprove the legitimacy of performances prior to 2005 unless compelling new corroborative evidence emerges, as was the case for the cyclist Lance Armstrong. This seems unlikely when conclusive evidence of doping and admissions of guilt are not forthcoming despite widely known practices of state-sponsored doping.2 Therefore, the proposal has some merit for expunction of world records that may have been set with the aid of illegal performance-enhancing drugs. Nevertheless, there are many …
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1071-1072
    Number of pages3
    JournalBritish Journal of Sports Medicine
    Volume52
    Issue number16
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2018

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Proposal to disregard athletics world records prior to 2005: a radical and misjudged initiative'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this