Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Prospective dynamic assessment of risk of sexual reoffending in individuals with an intellectual disability and a history of sexual offending behaviour

  • Rachael E. Lofthouse
  • , William R. Lindsay
  • , Vasiliki Totsika
  • , Richard P. Hastings
  • , Douglas BOER
  • , James L. Haaven

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Background, The purpose of the present study was to add to the literature on the predictive accuracy of a dynamic intellectual disability specific risk assessment tool.MethodA dynamic risk assessment for sexual reoffending (ARMIDILO-S), a static risk assessment for sexual offending (STATIC-99), and a static risk assessment for violence (Violence Risk Appraisal Guide [VRAG]) were completed for a sample of 64 adult males with an intellectual disability.ResultsThe dynamic risk assessment for sexual offenders with an intellectual disability resulted in the best prediction of sexual reoffending (ARMIDILO-S area under the curve (AUC) = 0.92) this was better than an established sexual offending static risk assessment (STATIC-99 AUC = 0.75). A static tool for violent reoffending, did not perform as well in this group (VRAG AUC = 0.58).ConclusionsResults suggest that dynamic variables are useful in predicting sexual reoffending with individuals with an intellectual disability, confirming previous findings. The ARMIDILO-S is a promising dynamic risk assessment for individuals with an intellectual disability.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)394-403
    Number of pages10
    JournalJournal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
    Volume26
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
      SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Prospective dynamic assessment of risk of sexual reoffending in individuals with an intellectual disability and a history of sexual offending behaviour'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this