Protecting the Rights of Those With Dementia Through Mandatory Registration of Enduring Powers? A Comparative Analysis

Trevor O RYAN, Bruce ARNOLD, Wendy BONYTHON

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article offers a comparative analysis of selected common law and civil law regimes regarding enduring powers of attorney and guardianship in relation to people who suffer from dementia. It highlights questions about mandatory registration of those powers and the effectiveness of non-registration in terms of promoting the autonomy of the individual and protection of that person’s personal and financial interests. It critiques principle and practice regarding privacy in relation to mandatory registration of enduring powers of attorney. The article argues that proposed reforms in Victoria are deficient with respect to protection of both the privacy and the welfare of the individual with dementia and highlights some potential pitfalls other jurisdictions should be aware of when undertaking their own reviews of the law in this field.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)355-386
Number of pages32
JournalAdelaide Law Review
Volume36
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

power of attorney
dementia
privacy
guardianship
civil law
common law
jurisdiction
autonomy
welfare
reform
human being
Law

Cite this

@article{c2891e0c72dc4affac6f99eb518182c5,
title = "Protecting the Rights of Those With Dementia Through Mandatory Registration of Enduring Powers? A Comparative Analysis",
abstract = "This article offers a comparative analysis of selected common law and civil law regimes regarding enduring powers of attorney and guardianship in relation to people who suffer from dementia. It highlights questions about mandatory registration of those powers and the effectiveness of non-registration in terms of promoting the autonomy of the individual and protection of that person’s personal and financial interests. It critiques principle and practice regarding privacy in relation to mandatory registration of enduring powers of attorney. The article argues that proposed reforms in Victoria are deficient with respect to protection of both the privacy and the welfare of the individual with dementia and highlights some potential pitfalls other jurisdictions should be aware of when undertaking their own reviews of the law in this field.",
author = "RYAN, {Trevor O} and Bruce ARNOLD and Wendy BONYTHON",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "355--386",
journal = "Adelaide Law Review",
issn = "0065-1915",
number = "2",

}

Protecting the Rights of Those With Dementia Through Mandatory Registration of Enduring Powers? A Comparative Analysis. / RYAN, Trevor O; ARNOLD, Bruce; BONYTHON, Wendy.

In: Adelaide Law Review, Vol. 36, No. 2, 2015, p. 355-386.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Protecting the Rights of Those With Dementia Through Mandatory Registration of Enduring Powers? A Comparative Analysis

AU - RYAN, Trevor O

AU - ARNOLD, Bruce

AU - BONYTHON, Wendy

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This article offers a comparative analysis of selected common law and civil law regimes regarding enduring powers of attorney and guardianship in relation to people who suffer from dementia. It highlights questions about mandatory registration of those powers and the effectiveness of non-registration in terms of promoting the autonomy of the individual and protection of that person’s personal and financial interests. It critiques principle and practice regarding privacy in relation to mandatory registration of enduring powers of attorney. The article argues that proposed reforms in Victoria are deficient with respect to protection of both the privacy and the welfare of the individual with dementia and highlights some potential pitfalls other jurisdictions should be aware of when undertaking their own reviews of the law in this field.

AB - This article offers a comparative analysis of selected common law and civil law regimes regarding enduring powers of attorney and guardianship in relation to people who suffer from dementia. It highlights questions about mandatory registration of those powers and the effectiveness of non-registration in terms of promoting the autonomy of the individual and protection of that person’s personal and financial interests. It critiques principle and practice regarding privacy in relation to mandatory registration of enduring powers of attorney. The article argues that proposed reforms in Victoria are deficient with respect to protection of both the privacy and the welfare of the individual with dementia and highlights some potential pitfalls other jurisdictions should be aware of when undertaking their own reviews of the law in this field.

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 355

EP - 386

JO - Adelaide Law Review

JF - Adelaide Law Review

SN - 0065-1915

IS - 2

ER -