Psychological Mechanisms of Deliberative Transformation: The Role of Group Identity

Luisa Batalha, Simon NIEMEYER, John DRYZEK, John Gastil

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Democratic deliberation has been shown to lead to shifts in people’s preferences for particular issues. The psychological mechanisms that underpin such shifts are not well understood. Against the backdrop of a deliberative forum we examined participants’ preferences for various types of political systems, how these preferences changed as deliberations proceeded and how the final preferences were associated with different levels of inclusiveness of a social identity. The results showed that at the end of the deliberations people’s preferences moved in the direction of satisfaction with the political system, and that this preference was positively associated with identification with the superordinate identification but negatively associated with the subgroup identification. We discuss the implication of these results for the design of deliberative forums as well as the role of social identity in deliberative democracy.
Original languageEnglish
Article number2
Pages (from-to)1-20
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Public Deliberation
Volume15
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

deliberation
Group
political system
deliberative democracy

Cite this

@article{73496838e6034026b9bbeb4603711c9f,
title = "Psychological Mechanisms of Deliberative Transformation: The Role of Group Identity",
abstract = "Democratic deliberation has been shown to lead to shifts in people’s preferences for particular issues. The psychological mechanisms that underpin such shifts are not well understood. Against the backdrop of a deliberative forum we examined participants’ preferences for various types of political systems, how these preferences changed as deliberations proceeded and how the final preferences were associated with different levels of inclusiveness of a social identity. The results showed that at the end of the deliberations people’s preferences moved in the direction of satisfaction with the political system, and that this preference was positively associated with identification with the superordinate identification but negatively associated with the subgroup identification. We discuss the implication of these results for the design of deliberative forums as well as the role of social identity in deliberative democracy.",
author = "Luisa Batalha and Simon NIEMEYER and John DRYZEK and John Gastil",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "1--20",
journal = "Journal of Public Deliberation",
issn = "1937-2841",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH",
number = "1",

}

Psychological Mechanisms of Deliberative Transformation: The Role of Group Identity. / Batalha, Luisa; NIEMEYER, Simon; DRYZEK, John; Gastil, John.

In: Journal of Public Deliberation, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2, 2019, p. 1-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychological Mechanisms of Deliberative Transformation: The Role of Group Identity

AU - Batalha, Luisa

AU - NIEMEYER, Simon

AU - DRYZEK, John

AU - Gastil, John

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Democratic deliberation has been shown to lead to shifts in people’s preferences for particular issues. The psychological mechanisms that underpin such shifts are not well understood. Against the backdrop of a deliberative forum we examined participants’ preferences for various types of political systems, how these preferences changed as deliberations proceeded and how the final preferences were associated with different levels of inclusiveness of a social identity. The results showed that at the end of the deliberations people’s preferences moved in the direction of satisfaction with the political system, and that this preference was positively associated with identification with the superordinate identification but negatively associated with the subgroup identification. We discuss the implication of these results for the design of deliberative forums as well as the role of social identity in deliberative democracy.

AB - Democratic deliberation has been shown to lead to shifts in people’s preferences for particular issues. The psychological mechanisms that underpin such shifts are not well understood. Against the backdrop of a deliberative forum we examined participants’ preferences for various types of political systems, how these preferences changed as deliberations proceeded and how the final preferences were associated with different levels of inclusiveness of a social identity. The results showed that at the end of the deliberations people’s preferences moved in the direction of satisfaction with the political system, and that this preference was positively associated with identification with the superordinate identification but negatively associated with the subgroup identification. We discuss the implication of these results for the design of deliberative forums as well as the role of social identity in deliberative democracy.

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 1

EP - 20

JO - Journal of Public Deliberation

JF - Journal of Public Deliberation

SN - 1937-2841

IS - 1

M1 - 2

ER -