Public deliberation in an era of communicative plenty

Selen ERCAN, Carolyn Maree HENDRIKS, John DRYZEK

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article introduces and develops the concept of ‘communicative plenty’ to capture the implications of the increasing volume of communication, both online and face-to face, in contemporary democracies. Drawing on recent systems thinking in deliberative democracy, the article argues that communicative plenty can offer a viable context for large scale public deliberation provided that: i) the spaces for voice and expression are accompanied by sufficient spaces of reflection and listening; and that ii) collective decisions involve sequencing of first expression, then listening, and then reflection. To substantiate this proposal, two cases where conventional democratic practices were modified either formally or informally to promote greater listening and reflection are subjected to close empirical analysis. The analysis reveals that designing spaces of reflection and listening is a practical means to enhance public deliberation and so democracy, particularly in contexts vulnerable to an overload of expression and the democratic pathologies of communicative plenty.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1-17
Number of pages17
JournalPolicy & Politics
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 9 Mar 2018

Fingerprint

deliberation
democracy
collective decision
deliberative democracy
pathology
empirical analysis
communication
public

Cite this

@article{9bc2da40b2bd4d1aa803f380aaaa2774,
title = "Public deliberation in an era of communicative plenty",
abstract = "This article introduces and develops the concept of ‘communicative plenty’ to capture the implications of the increasing volume of communication, both online and face-to face, in contemporary democracies. Drawing on recent systems thinking in deliberative democracy, the article argues that communicative plenty can offer a viable context for large scale public deliberation provided that: i) the spaces for voice and expression are accompanied by sufficient spaces of reflection and listening; and that ii) collective decisions involve sequencing of first expression, then listening, and then reflection. To substantiate this proposal, two cases where conventional democratic practices were modified either formally or informally to promote greater listening and reflection are subjected to close empirical analysis. The analysis reveals that designing spaces of reflection and listening is a practical means to enhance public deliberation and so democracy, particularly in contexts vulnerable to an overload of expression and the democratic pathologies of communicative plenty.",
keywords = "citizen engagement, deliberative democracy, internet, listening, participation, political communication, reflection",
author = "Selen ERCAN and HENDRIKS, {Carolyn Maree} and John DRYZEK",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1332/030557318X15200933925405",
language = "English",
pages = "1--17",
journal = "Policy and Politics",
issn = "0305-5736",
publisher = "Policy Press",

}

Public deliberation in an era of communicative plenty. / ERCAN, Selen; HENDRIKS, Carolyn Maree; DRYZEK, John.

In: Policy & Politics, 09.03.2018, p. 1-17.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public deliberation in an era of communicative plenty

AU - ERCAN, Selen

AU - HENDRIKS, Carolyn Maree

AU - DRYZEK, John

PY - 2018/3/9

Y1 - 2018/3/9

N2 - This article introduces and develops the concept of ‘communicative plenty’ to capture the implications of the increasing volume of communication, both online and face-to face, in contemporary democracies. Drawing on recent systems thinking in deliberative democracy, the article argues that communicative plenty can offer a viable context for large scale public deliberation provided that: i) the spaces for voice and expression are accompanied by sufficient spaces of reflection and listening; and that ii) collective decisions involve sequencing of first expression, then listening, and then reflection. To substantiate this proposal, two cases where conventional democratic practices were modified either formally or informally to promote greater listening and reflection are subjected to close empirical analysis. The analysis reveals that designing spaces of reflection and listening is a practical means to enhance public deliberation and so democracy, particularly in contexts vulnerable to an overload of expression and the democratic pathologies of communicative plenty.

AB - This article introduces and develops the concept of ‘communicative plenty’ to capture the implications of the increasing volume of communication, both online and face-to face, in contemporary democracies. Drawing on recent systems thinking in deliberative democracy, the article argues that communicative plenty can offer a viable context for large scale public deliberation provided that: i) the spaces for voice and expression are accompanied by sufficient spaces of reflection and listening; and that ii) collective decisions involve sequencing of first expression, then listening, and then reflection. To substantiate this proposal, two cases where conventional democratic practices were modified either formally or informally to promote greater listening and reflection are subjected to close empirical analysis. The analysis reveals that designing spaces of reflection and listening is a practical means to enhance public deliberation and so democracy, particularly in contexts vulnerable to an overload of expression and the democratic pathologies of communicative plenty.

KW - citizen engagement

KW - deliberative democracy

KW - internet

KW - listening

KW - participation

KW - political communication

KW - reflection

U2 - 10.1332/030557318X15200933925405

DO - 10.1332/030557318X15200933925405

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 17

JO - Policy and Politics

T2 - Policy and Politics

JF - Policy and Politics

SN - 0305-5736

ER -