Public health and environmental health risk assessment: Which paradigm and in whose best interests?

Colin L. Soskolne

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Epidemiology is the applied science central to public health. It provides the methods to study the distribution and determinants of diseases in populations. The focus of epidemiology is on community health, namely, on the prevention of disease, disability and premature death in communities of people as well as animals. Risk evaluation is one of the central steps in the classical health risk assessment paradigm to identify needs for risk management. This chapter evaluates the two independent health risk assessment reports of Davies and Sears commissioned in 2013 by the Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) for the formal hearing, and presents the merits of each. Some of the strengths and weaknesses of each approach are exposed, together with their implications for both science and public policy. Each of the two reports was to shed light on the question of health effects as expressed through community complaints in relation to emissions from the bitumen recovery and transportation processes.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEcological Systems Integrity: Governance, Law and Human Rights
EditorsLaura Westra, Janice Gray, Vasiliki Karageorgou
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherTaylor and Francis Inc.
Chapter16
Pages191-200
Number of pages10
Edition1
ISBN (Electronic)9781317501312
ISBN (Print)9781138885103
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 May 2015

Fingerprint

Environmental Health
epidemiology
environmental risk
health risk
risk assessment
public health
Public Health
applied science
asphalt
hearing
disability
Health
bitumen
community health
Epidemiology
public policy
disease prevention
risk management
Alberta
Premature Mortality

Cite this

Soskolne, C. L. (2015). Public health and environmental health risk assessment: Which paradigm and in whose best interests? In L. Westra, J. Gray, & V. Karageorgou (Eds.), Ecological Systems Integrity: Governance, Law and Human Rights (1 ed., pp. 191-200). London: Taylor and Francis Inc.. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315714547
Soskolne, Colin L. / Public health and environmental health risk assessment: Which paradigm and in whose best interests?. Ecological Systems Integrity: Governance, Law and Human Rights. editor / Laura Westra ; Janice Gray ; Vasiliki Karageorgou. 1. ed. London : Taylor and Francis Inc., 2015. pp. 191-200
@inbook{719dbbabdcaa4cd98a19ae3152b0b0ec,
title = "Public health and environmental health risk assessment: Which paradigm and in whose best interests?",
abstract = "Epidemiology is the applied science central to public health. It provides the methods to study the distribution and determinants of diseases in populations. The focus of epidemiology is on community health, namely, on the prevention of disease, disability and premature death in communities of people as well as animals. Risk evaluation is one of the central steps in the classical health risk assessment paradigm to identify needs for risk management. This chapter evaluates the two independent health risk assessment reports of Davies and Sears commissioned in 2013 by the Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) for the formal hearing, and presents the merits of each. Some of the strengths and weaknesses of each approach are exposed, together with their implications for both science and public policy. Each of the two reports was to shed light on the question of health effects as expressed through community complaints in relation to emissions from the bitumen recovery and transportation processes.",
author = "Soskolne, {Colin L.}",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "22",
doi = "10.4324/9781315714547",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781138885103",
pages = "191--200",
editor = "Laura Westra and Gray, {Janice } and Vasiliki Karageorgou",
booktitle = "Ecological Systems Integrity: Governance, Law and Human Rights",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Inc.",
edition = "1",

}

Soskolne, CL 2015, Public health and environmental health risk assessment: Which paradigm and in whose best interests? in L Westra, J Gray & V Karageorgou (eds), Ecological Systems Integrity: Governance, Law and Human Rights. 1 edn, Taylor and Francis Inc., London, pp. 191-200. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315714547

Public health and environmental health risk assessment: Which paradigm and in whose best interests? / Soskolne, Colin L.

Ecological Systems Integrity: Governance, Law and Human Rights. ed. / Laura Westra; Janice Gray; Vasiliki Karageorgou. 1. ed. London : Taylor and Francis Inc., 2015. p. 191-200.

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Public health and environmental health risk assessment: Which paradigm and in whose best interests?

AU - Soskolne, Colin L.

PY - 2015/5/22

Y1 - 2015/5/22

N2 - Epidemiology is the applied science central to public health. It provides the methods to study the distribution and determinants of diseases in populations. The focus of epidemiology is on community health, namely, on the prevention of disease, disability and premature death in communities of people as well as animals. Risk evaluation is one of the central steps in the classical health risk assessment paradigm to identify needs for risk management. This chapter evaluates the two independent health risk assessment reports of Davies and Sears commissioned in 2013 by the Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) for the formal hearing, and presents the merits of each. Some of the strengths and weaknesses of each approach are exposed, together with their implications for both science and public policy. Each of the two reports was to shed light on the question of health effects as expressed through community complaints in relation to emissions from the bitumen recovery and transportation processes.

AB - Epidemiology is the applied science central to public health. It provides the methods to study the distribution and determinants of diseases in populations. The focus of epidemiology is on community health, namely, on the prevention of disease, disability and premature death in communities of people as well as animals. Risk evaluation is one of the central steps in the classical health risk assessment paradigm to identify needs for risk management. This chapter evaluates the two independent health risk assessment reports of Davies and Sears commissioned in 2013 by the Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) for the formal hearing, and presents the merits of each. Some of the strengths and weaknesses of each approach are exposed, together with their implications for both science and public policy. Each of the two reports was to shed light on the question of health effects as expressed through community complaints in relation to emissions from the bitumen recovery and transportation processes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942693392&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9781315714547

DO - 10.4324/9781315714547

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781138885103

SP - 191

EP - 200

BT - Ecological Systems Integrity: Governance, Law and Human Rights

A2 - Westra, Laura

A2 - Gray, Janice

A2 - Karageorgou, Vasiliki

PB - Taylor and Francis Inc.

CY - London

ER -

Soskolne CL. Public health and environmental health risk assessment: Which paradigm and in whose best interests? In Westra L, Gray J, Karageorgou V, editors, Ecological Systems Integrity: Governance, Law and Human Rights. 1 ed. London: Taylor and Francis Inc. 2015. p. 191-200 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315714547