TY - JOUR
T1 - Public health impacts of city policies to reduce climate change
T2 - findings from the URGENCHE EU-China project
AU - Sabel, Clive E.
AU - Hiscock, Rosemary
AU - Asikainen, Arja
AU - Bi, Jun
AU - Depledge, Mike
AU - Van Den Elshout, Sef
AU - Friedrich, Rainer
AU - Huang, Ganlin
AU - Hurley, Fintan
AU - Jantunen, Matti
AU - Karakitsios, Spyros P.
AU - Keuken, Menno
AU - Kingham, Simon
AU - Kontoroupis, Periklis
AU - Kuenzli, Nino
AU - Liu, Miaomiao
AU - Martuzzi, Marco
AU - Morton, Katie
AU - Mudu, Pierpaolo
AU - Niittynen, Marjo
AU - Perez, Laura
AU - Sarigiannis, Denis
AU - Stahl-Timmins, Will
AU - Tobollik, Myriam
AU - Tuomisto, Jouni
AU - Willers, Saskia
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the European 7th Framework Programme (FP7) project: Urban Reduction of GHG Emissions in China and Europe (URGENCHE: Grant Agreement No. 265114). Funding covering publication costs for this paper was obtained from the EU’s FP7 Post-Grant Open Access Pilot initiative. This article has been published as part of Environmental Health Volume 15 Suppl 1, 2016: Healthy-Polis: Challenges and Opportunities for Urban Environmental Health and Sustainability. The full contents of the supplement can be found at http://www.ehjournal.net/supplements/15/S1.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Heaviside et al.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Background: Climate change is a global threat to health and wellbeing. Here we provide findings of an international research project investigating the health and wellbeing impacts of policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in urban environments. Methods: Five European and two Chinese city authorities and partner academic organisations formed the project consortium. The methodology involved modelling the impact of adopted urban climate-change mitigation transport, buildings and energy policy scenarios, usually for the year 2020 and comparing them with business as usual (BAU) scenarios (where policies had not been adopted). Carbon dioxide emissions, health impacting exposures (air pollution, noise and physical activity), health (cardiovascular, respiratory, cancer and leukaemia) and wellbeing (including noise related wellbeing, overall wellbeing, economic wellbeing and inequalities) were modelled. The scenarios were developed from corresponding known levels in 2010 and pre-existing exposure response functions. Additionally there were literature reviews, three longitudinal observational studies and two cross sectional surveys. Results: There are four key findings. Firstly introduction of electric cars may confer some small health benefits but it would be unwise for a city to invest in electric vehicles unless their power generation fuel mix generates fewer emissions than petrol and diesel. Second, adopting policies to reduce private car use may have benefits for carbon dioxide reduction and positive health impacts through reduced noise and increased physical activity. Third, the benefits of carbon dioxide reduction from increasing housing efficiency are likely to be minor and co-benefits for health and wellbeing are dependent on good air exchange. Fourthly, although heating dwellings by in-home biomass burning may reduce carbon dioxide emissions, consequences for health and wellbeing were negative with the technology in use in the cities studied.Conclusions: The climate-change reduction policies reduced CO2 emissions (the most common greenhouse gas) from cities but impact on global emissions of CO2 would be more limited due to some displacement of emissions. The health and wellbeing impacts varied and were often limited reflecting existing relatively high quality of life and environmental standards in most of the participating cities; the greatest potential for future health benefit occurs in less developed or developing countries.
AB - Background: Climate change is a global threat to health and wellbeing. Here we provide findings of an international research project investigating the health and wellbeing impacts of policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in urban environments. Methods: Five European and two Chinese city authorities and partner academic organisations formed the project consortium. The methodology involved modelling the impact of adopted urban climate-change mitigation transport, buildings and energy policy scenarios, usually for the year 2020 and comparing them with business as usual (BAU) scenarios (where policies had not been adopted). Carbon dioxide emissions, health impacting exposures (air pollution, noise and physical activity), health (cardiovascular, respiratory, cancer and leukaemia) and wellbeing (including noise related wellbeing, overall wellbeing, economic wellbeing and inequalities) were modelled. The scenarios were developed from corresponding known levels in 2010 and pre-existing exposure response functions. Additionally there were literature reviews, three longitudinal observational studies and two cross sectional surveys. Results: There are four key findings. Firstly introduction of electric cars may confer some small health benefits but it would be unwise for a city to invest in electric vehicles unless their power generation fuel mix generates fewer emissions than petrol and diesel. Second, adopting policies to reduce private car use may have benefits for carbon dioxide reduction and positive health impacts through reduced noise and increased physical activity. Third, the benefits of carbon dioxide reduction from increasing housing efficiency are likely to be minor and co-benefits for health and wellbeing are dependent on good air exchange. Fourthly, although heating dwellings by in-home biomass burning may reduce carbon dioxide emissions, consequences for health and wellbeing were negative with the technology in use in the cities studied.Conclusions: The climate-change reduction policies reduced CO2 emissions (the most common greenhouse gas) from cities but impact on global emissions of CO2 would be more limited due to some displacement of emissions. The health and wellbeing impacts varied and were often limited reflecting existing relatively high quality of life and environmental standards in most of the participating cities; the greatest potential for future health benefit occurs in less developed or developing countries.
KW - Air pollution
KW - Buildings
KW - China
KW - Energy
KW - Europe
KW - Greenhouse gas emission reduction policies
KW - Health
KW - Transport
KW - Urban
KW - Wellbeing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84995695073&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12940-016-0097-0
DO - 10.1186/s12940-016-0097-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 26960925
AN - SCOPUS:84995695073
SN - 1476-069X
VL - 15
SP - 5
EP - 21
JO - Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source
JF - Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source
M1 - 25
ER -