Public open space exposure measures in Australian health research

A critical review of the literature

Karen E. Lamb, Suzanne Mavoa, Neil T. Coffee, Kate Parker, Elizabeth A. Richardson, Lukar E. Thornton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Numerous studies have shown associations between public open space and a variety of health outcomes. Yet the extent to which firm conclusions and planning policy recommendations can be drawn from this body of work depends on how public open space availability has been measured and reported. Other researchers have highlighted potential issues with the way that public open space has been measured but have not systematically assessed the extent of this problem. This paper provides a comprehensive critical review of studies of public open space and health conducted in Australia to identify and compare public open space measurement and data treatment. Our analysis showed wide variation in how public open space was measured, as well as a lack of consistency in reporting public open space exposure measures and under-reporting of measurement methods. We find that such tendencies limit how much these studies can be compared and contrasted with each other. The corollary of that finding is that without more detailed reporting of exposure measures, it will be difficult to establish an evidence base that informs planning for healthy, liveable environments. In response, we develop and present a checklist for reporting public open space exposure to address this challenge.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)67-83
Number of pages17
JournalGeographical Research
Volume57
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2019

Fingerprint

public space
open space
health
measurement method
planning
exposure
literature
lack
evidence

Cite this

Lamb, Karen E. ; Mavoa, Suzanne ; Coffee, Neil T. ; Parker, Kate ; Richardson, Elizabeth A. ; Thornton, Lukar E. / Public open space exposure measures in Australian health research : A critical review of the literature. In: Geographical Research. 2019 ; Vol. 57, No. 1. pp. 67-83.
@article{75bfa3ac9f4b443992b776bfb25bde34,
title = "Public open space exposure measures in Australian health research: A critical review of the literature",
abstract = "Numerous studies have shown associations between public open space and a variety of health outcomes. Yet the extent to which firm conclusions and planning policy recommendations can be drawn from this body of work depends on how public open space availability has been measured and reported. Other researchers have highlighted potential issues with the way that public open space has been measured but have not systematically assessed the extent of this problem. This paper provides a comprehensive critical review of studies of public open space and health conducted in Australia to identify and compare public open space measurement and data treatment. Our analysis showed wide variation in how public open space was measured, as well as a lack of consistency in reporting public open space exposure measures and under-reporting of measurement methods. We find that such tendencies limit how much these studies can be compared and contrasted with each other. The corollary of that finding is that without more detailed reporting of exposure measures, it will be difficult to establish an evidence base that informs planning for healthy, liveable environments. In response, we develop and present a checklist for reporting public open space exposure to address this challenge.",
keywords = "Australia, geographic information system (GIS), green space, health geography, parks, public open space",
author = "Lamb, {Karen E.} and Suzanne Mavoa and Coffee, {Neil T.} and Kate Parker and Richardson, {Elizabeth A.} and Thornton, {Lukar E.}",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1111/1745-5871.12325",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "67--83",
journal = "Australian Geographical Studies",
issn = "1745-5863",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

Public open space exposure measures in Australian health research : A critical review of the literature. / Lamb, Karen E.; Mavoa, Suzanne; Coffee, Neil T.; Parker, Kate; Richardson, Elizabeth A.; Thornton, Lukar E.

In: Geographical Research, Vol. 57, No. 1, 02.2019, p. 67-83.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public open space exposure measures in Australian health research

T2 - A critical review of the literature

AU - Lamb, Karen E.

AU - Mavoa, Suzanne

AU - Coffee, Neil T.

AU - Parker, Kate

AU - Richardson, Elizabeth A.

AU - Thornton, Lukar E.

PY - 2019/2

Y1 - 2019/2

N2 - Numerous studies have shown associations between public open space and a variety of health outcomes. Yet the extent to which firm conclusions and planning policy recommendations can be drawn from this body of work depends on how public open space availability has been measured and reported. Other researchers have highlighted potential issues with the way that public open space has been measured but have not systematically assessed the extent of this problem. This paper provides a comprehensive critical review of studies of public open space and health conducted in Australia to identify and compare public open space measurement and data treatment. Our analysis showed wide variation in how public open space was measured, as well as a lack of consistency in reporting public open space exposure measures and under-reporting of measurement methods. We find that such tendencies limit how much these studies can be compared and contrasted with each other. The corollary of that finding is that without more detailed reporting of exposure measures, it will be difficult to establish an evidence base that informs planning for healthy, liveable environments. In response, we develop and present a checklist for reporting public open space exposure to address this challenge.

AB - Numerous studies have shown associations between public open space and a variety of health outcomes. Yet the extent to which firm conclusions and planning policy recommendations can be drawn from this body of work depends on how public open space availability has been measured and reported. Other researchers have highlighted potential issues with the way that public open space has been measured but have not systematically assessed the extent of this problem. This paper provides a comprehensive critical review of studies of public open space and health conducted in Australia to identify and compare public open space measurement and data treatment. Our analysis showed wide variation in how public open space was measured, as well as a lack of consistency in reporting public open space exposure measures and under-reporting of measurement methods. We find that such tendencies limit how much these studies can be compared and contrasted with each other. The corollary of that finding is that without more detailed reporting of exposure measures, it will be difficult to establish an evidence base that informs planning for healthy, liveable environments. In response, we develop and present a checklist for reporting public open space exposure to address this challenge.

KW - Australia

KW - geographic information system (GIS)

KW - green space

KW - health geography

KW - parks

KW - public open space

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061053611&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1745-5871.12325

DO - 10.1111/1745-5871.12325

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 67

EP - 83

JO - Australian Geographical Studies

JF - Australian Geographical Studies

SN - 1745-5863

IS - 1

ER -