TY - JOUR
T1 - Public-Private Partnerships
T2 - Implications from Policy Changes for Practice in Managing Risks
AU - Wu, Jin
AU - Liu, Henry
AU - Sing, Michael
AU - Humphrey, Richard
AU - Zhao, Jianfeng
N1 - Funding Information:
Beijing Underground Line 4, for example, has been claimed as a successful PPP by China's central government. This urban rail PPP project is under the DBFO contract with the demand-based payment regime; however, 70% of the financing was provided by a state-owned capital investment group, and the construction work was required to be subcontracted back to a state-owned contractor after the financial close (). As a result of involving the market-oriented state-owned companies into PPPs, the “space” for the purely private entities to manage or operate the assets will be substantially compressed (i.e. “Risk balance between private and public sectors” as illustrated in ). Notably, there has been a common issue that the Chinese state-owned companies are subjected to low efficiency and bureaucracy. Therefore, an involvement of “social capital” (RF) may make the privately owned organization involved with PPPs in China confront a number of problems, e.g. ineffective use of resources, inefficient dispute resolution and poor interorganization communication, which may affect the VfM and effectiveness of the project as illustrated by the second CLD (). 8
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited.
PY - 2020/10/7
Y1 - 2020/10/7
N2 - Purpose – This paper investigates the policy changes made towards infrastructure Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs). The purpose of the study is to empirically identify the policy risks associated with the development of PPPs and to assess their impacts on the projects. Design/methodology/approach – A case study of the policy changes that have been implemented for PPPs in China over the past seven years has been undertaken and is presented in this study. The Causal Loop Diagrams (CLDs) are applied to assess and illustrate the potential impacts of the risks as a result of such changes on PPPs. Findings – A sequence of the policy risks, which relate to PPP risk allocation, contract management and implementation, payment and abatement mechanisms and financing, has been identified. It is also found that the identified risks will generate significant but negative impacts on PPPs, leading to an ineffective project delivery, low revenue, poor service quality and even contract breach. Practical Implications – This research provides the private-sector entities that will embark on PPPs with an insight into managing and controlling policy risks over the project’s lifecycle. Originality/value – PPPs have been critical for infrastructure development worldwide. Nevertheless, they have been a controversy, as many of them were subjected to poor outputs. Consequently, a variety of political mechanisms has been implemented to enhance the governance for PPPs. Policy can bring not only benefits, but also risks and, however, policy risks of PPPs with a particular assessment for their potential impacts have received limited attention. Therefore, the study presented in this paper will contribute to the identification and assessment of policy risks within the context of PPPs.
AB - Purpose – This paper investigates the policy changes made towards infrastructure Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs). The purpose of the study is to empirically identify the policy risks associated with the development of PPPs and to assess their impacts on the projects. Design/methodology/approach – A case study of the policy changes that have been implemented for PPPs in China over the past seven years has been undertaken and is presented in this study. The Causal Loop Diagrams (CLDs) are applied to assess and illustrate the potential impacts of the risks as a result of such changes on PPPs. Findings – A sequence of the policy risks, which relate to PPP risk allocation, contract management and implementation, payment and abatement mechanisms and financing, has been identified. It is also found that the identified risks will generate significant but negative impacts on PPPs, leading to an ineffective project delivery, low revenue, poor service quality and even contract breach. Practical Implications – This research provides the private-sector entities that will embark on PPPs with an insight into managing and controlling policy risks over the project’s lifecycle. Originality/value – PPPs have been critical for infrastructure development worldwide. Nevertheless, they have been a controversy, as many of them were subjected to poor outputs. Consequently, a variety of political mechanisms has been implemented to enhance the governance for PPPs. Policy can bring not only benefits, but also risks and, however, policy risks of PPPs with a particular assessment for their potential impacts have received limited attention. Therefore, the study presented in this paper will contribute to the identification and assessment of policy risks within the context of PPPs.
KW - Public-Private Partnerships
KW - Infrastructure projects
KW - Policy risk
KW - Institutional arrangements
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085109811&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1108/ECAM-09-2018-0400
DO - 10.1108/ECAM-09-2018-0400
M3 - Article
SN - 1365-232X
VL - 27
SP - 2253
EP - 2269
JO - Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management
JF - Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management
IS - 9
ER -