Public responses and reflexivity during the swine flu pandemic in Australia

Kate HOLLAND, Warwick BLOOD

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper examines key aspects of the Australian public's response to swine flu through an analysis of interviews and focus groups with people deemed at risk by medical authorities. The wider context for the study is provided by risk theory, research on public responses to emerging infectious diseases (EID) and the concept of biocommunicability. We focus on reflexivity in engaging with media, views on the government's response, and vigilance and behaviour change. EID fatigue, a predisposition toward distrusting the media, personal circumstances and location within particular social networks, shaped responses to news reporting of swine flu. People did not link swine flu to already stigmatised groups because they identified it as resident in the community. The continuing dependency of lay publics upon governments and expert systems may help to explain the lack of criticism directed at more traditionally powerful groups. Distancing took a variety of forms. While newspapers emphasised the novel and deadly swine flu narrative, audiences readily described it as just another flu and were unconcerned about contracting it. However, some imagined that others were more vulnerable to the effects of media reporting. Some reported searching the internet for information, which may explain the differences between how they saw it and how it was reported. Also influential was the fact that their lived experiences did not bear out the novelty or seriousness of swine flu. Our discussion is informed by our concurrent analyses of media coverage and interviews with EID experts and journalists involved in the reporting
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)523-538
Number of pages16
JournalJournalism Studies
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

reflexivity
contagious disease
Expert systems
Group
knowledge-based system
interview
fatigue
Fatigue of materials
journalist
Internet
newspaper
social network
news
criticism
coverage
expert
resident
narrative
lack
community

Cite this

@article{0e022125d6a74b438fdcd809bf4a1acf,
title = "Public responses and reflexivity during the swine flu pandemic in Australia",
abstract = "This paper examines key aspects of the Australian public's response to swine flu through an analysis of interviews and focus groups with people deemed at risk by medical authorities. The wider context for the study is provided by risk theory, research on public responses to emerging infectious diseases (EID) and the concept of biocommunicability. We focus on reflexivity in engaging with media, views on the government's response, and vigilance and behaviour change. EID fatigue, a predisposition toward distrusting the media, personal circumstances and location within particular social networks, shaped responses to news reporting of swine flu. People did not link swine flu to already stigmatised groups because they identified it as resident in the community. The continuing dependency of lay publics upon governments and expert systems may help to explain the lack of criticism directed at more traditionally powerful groups. Distancing took a variety of forms. While newspapers emphasised the novel and deadly swine flu narrative, audiences readily described it as just another flu and were unconcerned about contracting it. However, some imagined that others were more vulnerable to the effects of media reporting. Some reported searching the internet for information, which may explain the differences between how they saw it and how it was reported. Also influential was the fact that their lived experiences did not bear out the novelty or seriousness of swine flu. Our discussion is informed by our concurrent analyses of media coverage and interviews with EID experts and journalists involved in the reporting",
keywords = "news media, public health, risk",
author = "Kate HOLLAND and Warwick BLOOD",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1080/1461670X.2012.744552",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "523--538",
journal = "Journalism Studies",
issn = "1461-670X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

Public responses and reflexivity during the swine flu pandemic in Australia. / HOLLAND, Kate; BLOOD, Warwick.

In: Journalism Studies, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2013, p. 523-538.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public responses and reflexivity during the swine flu pandemic in Australia

AU - HOLLAND, Kate

AU - BLOOD, Warwick

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - This paper examines key aspects of the Australian public's response to swine flu through an analysis of interviews and focus groups with people deemed at risk by medical authorities. The wider context for the study is provided by risk theory, research on public responses to emerging infectious diseases (EID) and the concept of biocommunicability. We focus on reflexivity in engaging with media, views on the government's response, and vigilance and behaviour change. EID fatigue, a predisposition toward distrusting the media, personal circumstances and location within particular social networks, shaped responses to news reporting of swine flu. People did not link swine flu to already stigmatised groups because they identified it as resident in the community. The continuing dependency of lay publics upon governments and expert systems may help to explain the lack of criticism directed at more traditionally powerful groups. Distancing took a variety of forms. While newspapers emphasised the novel and deadly swine flu narrative, audiences readily described it as just another flu and were unconcerned about contracting it. However, some imagined that others were more vulnerable to the effects of media reporting. Some reported searching the internet for information, which may explain the differences between how they saw it and how it was reported. Also influential was the fact that their lived experiences did not bear out the novelty or seriousness of swine flu. Our discussion is informed by our concurrent analyses of media coverage and interviews with EID experts and journalists involved in the reporting

AB - This paper examines key aspects of the Australian public's response to swine flu through an analysis of interviews and focus groups with people deemed at risk by medical authorities. The wider context for the study is provided by risk theory, research on public responses to emerging infectious diseases (EID) and the concept of biocommunicability. We focus on reflexivity in engaging with media, views on the government's response, and vigilance and behaviour change. EID fatigue, a predisposition toward distrusting the media, personal circumstances and location within particular social networks, shaped responses to news reporting of swine flu. People did not link swine flu to already stigmatised groups because they identified it as resident in the community. The continuing dependency of lay publics upon governments and expert systems may help to explain the lack of criticism directed at more traditionally powerful groups. Distancing took a variety of forms. While newspapers emphasised the novel and deadly swine flu narrative, audiences readily described it as just another flu and were unconcerned about contracting it. However, some imagined that others were more vulnerable to the effects of media reporting. Some reported searching the internet for information, which may explain the differences between how they saw it and how it was reported. Also influential was the fact that their lived experiences did not bear out the novelty or seriousness of swine flu. Our discussion is informed by our concurrent analyses of media coverage and interviews with EID experts and journalists involved in the reporting

KW - news media

KW - public health

KW - risk

U2 - 10.1080/1461670X.2012.744552

DO - 10.1080/1461670X.2012.744552

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 523

EP - 538

JO - Journalism Studies

JF - Journalism Studies

SN - 1461-670X

IS - 4

ER -