Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
University of Canberra Research Portal Home
Search content at University of Canberra Research Portal
Home
Profiles
Research output
Projects
Press/MediaIO
Activities
Research units
Prizes
Student theses
Impacts
Public sector, private sector and socio-cultural response options
Henry Neufeldt
, Pablo Pacheco
,
Hemant R. Ojha
, Sarah Ayeri Ogalleh
, Jason Donovan
, Lisa Fuchs
, Daniela Kleinschmit
, Patti Kristjanson
, Godwin Kowero
, Vincent O. Oeba
, Bronwen Powell
Research output
:
A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in Book
›
Chapter
›
peer-review
1
Link opens in a new tab
Citation (Scopus)
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Public sector, private sector and socio-cultural response options'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Food Security
100%
Public Sector
100%
Response Options
100%
Cultural Responses
100%
Smallholders
50%
Tree-based
50%
Rural Population
50%
Food nutrition
50%
Forest-based
50%
Behavior Change
33%
Policy Framework
33%
Food Systems
33%
Social Reactions
33%
Corporate Actors
33%
Sustainable Supply
33%
Local Level
16%
Positive Impact
16%
Local Community
16%
Global Processes
16%
Value Chain
16%
Urban Areas
16%
Equitable Access
16%
Policy Response
16%
Social Movements
16%
Market-based
16%
Governance Issues
16%
Government Departments
16%
Institutional Structure
16%
Political Economy
16%
Most Vulnerable
16%
Sub-national Level
16%
Improved Health
16%
Business Model
16%
Regulatory Framework
16%
Governance Structure
16%
Devolution
16%
Political Responses
16%
Low Environmental Impact
16%
Reduced Inequalities
16%
Local Practices
16%
Access to Food
16%
Social Mobilization
16%
Regulatory Approach
16%
Dietary Choices
16%
Institutional Capacity
16%
Production Practices
16%
Private Actors
16%
Marginalized Groups
16%
Sustainable Forest Management
16%
Management Knowledge
16%
Benefit Sharing
16%
Multi-stakeholder Approach
16%
Intangible Benefits
16%
Multi-actor
16%
Future Production
16%
Right to Food
16%
Forest Products
16%
Food Forests
16%
Urban Demand
16%
Sustainability Standards
16%
Tree Products
16%
Gender-specific Interventions
16%
Practice Management System
16%
Economic Responses
16%
Inclusive Value Chain
16%
Forest Tenure Reform
16%
Sustainable Landscape Management
16%
Zero Deforestation
16%
Social Sciences
Public Sector
100%
Private Sector
100%
Food Security
100%
Rural Population
50%
Value Chain
33%
Decision Making
33%
Disadvantaged Group
33%
Education
33%
Household
16%
Government Departments
16%
Political Economics
16%
Regulatory Framework
16%
Forest Management
16%
Landscape Management
16%
Budget Contributions
16%
Multi-Stakeholders
16%
Right to Food
16%
Business Model
16%
Marginalized Group
16%
Tangible Benefit
16%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Public Sector
100%
Private Sector
100%
Smallholder
100%
Value Creation
66%
Government Department
33%
Business Model
33%
Regulatory Framework
33%
Budget Contributions
33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Rural Population
100%
Decision Making
66%
Forest Management
33%
Food Choice
33%
Landscape Management
33%
Deforestation
33%
Food Science
Food Security
100%
Nutrition
50%
Food systems
33%
Food Choice
16%