Purpose

Focus the discussion and inform the debate

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

Abstract

It has been established for several decades that the spatial distribution of chronic disease, including obesity, co-varies with spatial variation in the characteristics of populations and population context [1], [2], [3]. The article by Fitzpatrick et al. [4] asserts extending this substantial literature by showing such relations for 500 cities in the U.S. The letter by Feldman, in this issue, commendable for logic and conciseness, critiques this claim on methodological grounds. Feldman’s point can be restated thus: Fitzpatrick et al.’s conclusion, “… a clear connection between obesity prevalence, income inequality, and racial and ethnic population composition across census tracts in the 500 largest U.S. cities” is inconsequential as an artefact reflecting the use of these variables in the estimation of the obesity prevalence rates with which they were found to be associated.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)403-404
Number of pages2
JournalObesity Research and Clinical Practice
Volume12
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2018

Fingerprint

Obesity
Censuses
Population Characteristics
Artifacts
Population
Chronic Disease

Cite this

@article{c43c03ff1b764bc4b8cc058a7fed6b5f,
title = "Purpose: Focus the discussion and inform the debate",
abstract = "It has been established for several decades that the spatial distribution of chronic disease, including obesity, co-varies with spatial variation in the characteristics of populations and population context [1], [2], [3]. The article by Fitzpatrick et al. [4] asserts extending this substantial literature by showing such relations for 500 cities in the U.S. The letter by Feldman, in this issue, commendable for logic and conciseness, critiques this claim on methodological grounds. Feldman’s point can be restated thus: Fitzpatrick et al.’s conclusion, “… a clear connection between obesity prevalence, income inequality, and racial and ethnic population composition across census tracts in the 500 largest U.S. cities” is inconsequential as an artefact reflecting the use of these variables in the estimation of the obesity prevalence rates with which they were found to be associated.",
author = "Mark Daniel",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.orcp.2018.08.006",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "403--404",
journal = "Obesity Research and Clinical Practice",
issn = "1871-403X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "5",

}

Purpose : Focus the discussion and inform the debate. / Daniel, Mark.

In: Obesity Research and Clinical Practice, Vol. 12, No. 5, 09.2018, p. 403-404.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

TY - JOUR

T1 - Purpose

T2 - Focus the discussion and inform the debate

AU - Daniel, Mark

PY - 2018/9

Y1 - 2018/9

N2 - It has been established for several decades that the spatial distribution of chronic disease, including obesity, co-varies with spatial variation in the characteristics of populations and population context [1], [2], [3]. The article by Fitzpatrick et al. [4] asserts extending this substantial literature by showing such relations for 500 cities in the U.S. The letter by Feldman, in this issue, commendable for logic and conciseness, critiques this claim on methodological grounds. Feldman’s point can be restated thus: Fitzpatrick et al.’s conclusion, “… a clear connection between obesity prevalence, income inequality, and racial and ethnic population composition across census tracts in the 500 largest U.S. cities” is inconsequential as an artefact reflecting the use of these variables in the estimation of the obesity prevalence rates with which they were found to be associated.

AB - It has been established for several decades that the spatial distribution of chronic disease, including obesity, co-varies with spatial variation in the characteristics of populations and population context [1], [2], [3]. The article by Fitzpatrick et al. [4] asserts extending this substantial literature by showing such relations for 500 cities in the U.S. The letter by Feldman, in this issue, commendable for logic and conciseness, critiques this claim on methodological grounds. Feldman’s point can be restated thus: Fitzpatrick et al.’s conclusion, “… a clear connection between obesity prevalence, income inequality, and racial and ethnic population composition across census tracts in the 500 largest U.S. cities” is inconsequential as an artefact reflecting the use of these variables in the estimation of the obesity prevalence rates with which they were found to be associated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053183041&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/purpose-focus-discussion-inform-debate

U2 - 10.1016/j.orcp.2018.08.006

DO - 10.1016/j.orcp.2018.08.006

M3 - Editorial

VL - 12

SP - 403

EP - 404

JO - Obesity Research and Clinical Practice

JF - Obesity Research and Clinical Practice

SN - 1871-403X

IS - 5

ER -