Pushing Them to the Edge: an Assessment of Spatial Microsimulation Methods

    Research output: Contribution to conference (non-published works)Paper

    Abstract

    This paper will look at how well a spatial microsimulation model handles additional constraints, and how results from univariate constraint tables rather than multivariate constraint tables compare. This paper will also test how well non-Capital city households from a survey can estimate areas within capital cities. The argument for this approach is that the spatial microsimulation method has more households to choose from to represent the constraints in the area being estimated. In theory, this should improve the fit of the model. However, the alternative argument that could be made is that a household from another area may not be representative of households in the area being estimated – so, for example, in Australia, households in remote New South Wales will not be representative of households in Sydney. This paper aims to check the appropriateness of using households from anywhere in Australia to estimate SLAs in capital cities by running each model both ways (so using all households to estimate small areas in Sydney; and then using Sydney households to estimate small areas in Sydney), and comparing and contrasting the results. The data used in the model is Australian Census and survey data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS).
    Original languageEnglish
    Number of pages22
    Publication statusPublished - 2009
    Event2nd General Conference of the International Microsimulation Association 'Microsimulation: Bridging Data and Policy' - Ottawa, Canada
    Duration: 8 Jun 200910 Jun 2009

    Conference

    Conference2nd General Conference of the International Microsimulation Association 'Microsimulation: Bridging Data and Policy'
    CountryCanada
    CityOttawa
    Period8/06/0910/06/09

    Fingerprint

    capital city
    method
    household
    census
    test
    city
    statistics

    Cite this

    Tanton, R., & Vidyattama, Y. (2009). Pushing Them to the Edge: an Assessment of Spatial Microsimulation Methods. Paper presented at 2nd General Conference of the International Microsimulation Association 'Microsimulation: Bridging Data and Policy', Ottawa, Canada.
    Tanton, Robert ; Vidyattama, Yogi. / Pushing Them to the Edge: an Assessment of Spatial Microsimulation Methods. Paper presented at 2nd General Conference of the International Microsimulation Association 'Microsimulation: Bridging Data and Policy', Ottawa, Canada.22 p.
    @conference{0d8264a50e54404ca1a1d7a2dbe81067,
    title = "Pushing Them to the Edge: an Assessment of Spatial Microsimulation Methods",
    abstract = "This paper will look at how well a spatial microsimulation model handles additional constraints, and how results from univariate constraint tables rather than multivariate constraint tables compare. This paper will also test how well non-Capital city households from a survey can estimate areas within capital cities. The argument for this approach is that the spatial microsimulation method has more households to choose from to represent the constraints in the area being estimated. In theory, this should improve the fit of the model. However, the alternative argument that could be made is that a household from another area may not be representative of households in the area being estimated – so, for example, in Australia, households in remote New South Wales will not be representative of households in Sydney. This paper aims to check the appropriateness of using households from anywhere in Australia to estimate SLAs in capital cities by running each model both ways (so using all households to estimate small areas in Sydney; and then using Sydney households to estimate small areas in Sydney), and comparing and contrasting the results. The data used in the model is Australian Census and survey data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS).",
    author = "Robert Tanton and Yogi Vidyattama",
    year = "2009",
    language = "English",
    note = "2nd General Conference of the International Microsimulation Association 'Microsimulation: Bridging Data and Policy' ; Conference date: 08-06-2009 Through 10-06-2009",

    }

    Tanton, R & Vidyattama, Y 2009, 'Pushing Them to the Edge: an Assessment of Spatial Microsimulation Methods' Paper presented at 2nd General Conference of the International Microsimulation Association 'Microsimulation: Bridging Data and Policy', Ottawa, Canada, 8/06/09 - 10/06/09, .

    Pushing Them to the Edge: an Assessment of Spatial Microsimulation Methods. / Tanton, Robert; Vidyattama, Yogi.

    2009. Paper presented at 2nd General Conference of the International Microsimulation Association 'Microsimulation: Bridging Data and Policy', Ottawa, Canada.

    Research output: Contribution to conference (non-published works)Paper

    TY - CONF

    T1 - Pushing Them to the Edge: an Assessment of Spatial Microsimulation Methods

    AU - Tanton, Robert

    AU - Vidyattama, Yogi

    PY - 2009

    Y1 - 2009

    N2 - This paper will look at how well a spatial microsimulation model handles additional constraints, and how results from univariate constraint tables rather than multivariate constraint tables compare. This paper will also test how well non-Capital city households from a survey can estimate areas within capital cities. The argument for this approach is that the spatial microsimulation method has more households to choose from to represent the constraints in the area being estimated. In theory, this should improve the fit of the model. However, the alternative argument that could be made is that a household from another area may not be representative of households in the area being estimated – so, for example, in Australia, households in remote New South Wales will not be representative of households in Sydney. This paper aims to check the appropriateness of using households from anywhere in Australia to estimate SLAs in capital cities by running each model both ways (so using all households to estimate small areas in Sydney; and then using Sydney households to estimate small areas in Sydney), and comparing and contrasting the results. The data used in the model is Australian Census and survey data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS).

    AB - This paper will look at how well a spatial microsimulation model handles additional constraints, and how results from univariate constraint tables rather than multivariate constraint tables compare. This paper will also test how well non-Capital city households from a survey can estimate areas within capital cities. The argument for this approach is that the spatial microsimulation method has more households to choose from to represent the constraints in the area being estimated. In theory, this should improve the fit of the model. However, the alternative argument that could be made is that a household from another area may not be representative of households in the area being estimated – so, for example, in Australia, households in remote New South Wales will not be representative of households in Sydney. This paper aims to check the appropriateness of using households from anywhere in Australia to estimate SLAs in capital cities by running each model both ways (so using all households to estimate small areas in Sydney; and then using Sydney households to estimate small areas in Sydney), and comparing and contrasting the results. The data used in the model is Australian Census and survey data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS).

    M3 - Paper

    ER -

    Tanton R, Vidyattama Y. Pushing Them to the Edge: an Assessment of Spatial Microsimulation Methods. 2009. Paper presented at 2nd General Conference of the International Microsimulation Association 'Microsimulation: Bridging Data and Policy', Ottawa, Canada.