Quality indicators as a tool in improving the introduction of new medicines

Stephen Campbell, Brian Godman, Eduard Diogène, Jurij Furst, Lars Gustafsson, Sean MacBride-Stewart, Rickard Malmstrom, Hanne Pedersen, Gisbert Selke, Vera Vlahovic-Palcevski, Menno Van Woerkom, Durhane Wong-Rieger, Björn Wettermark

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Quality indicators are increasingly used as a tool to achieve safe and quality clinical care, cost-effective therapy, for professional learning, remuneration, accreditation and financial incentives. A substantial number focus on drug therapy but few address the introduction of new medicines even though this is a burning issue. The objective was to describe the issues and challenges in designing and implementing a transparent indicator framework and evaluation protocol for the introduction of new medicines and to provide guidance on how to apply quality indicators in the managed entry of new medicines. Quality indicators need to be developed early to assess whether new medicines are introduced appropriately. A number of key factors need to be addressed when developing, applying and evaluating indicators including dimensions of quality, suggested testing protocols, potential data sources, key implementation factors such as intended and unintended consequences, budget impact and cost-effectiveness, assuring the involvement of the medical professions, patients and the public, and reliable and easy-to-use computerized tools for data collection and management. Transparent approaches include the need for any quality indicators developed to handle conflict of interests to enhance their validity and acceptance. The suggested framework and indicator testing protocol may be useful in assessing the applicability of indicators for new medicines and may be adapted to healthcare settings worldwide. The suggestions build on existing literature to create a field testing methodology that can be used to produce country-specific quality indicators for new medicines as well as a cross international approach to facilitate access to new medicines
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)146-157
Number of pages12
JournalBasic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology
Volume116
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Remuneration
Conflict of Interest
Accreditation
Quality of Health Care
Information Storage and Retrieval
Budgets
Medicine
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Motivation
Learning
Delivery of Health Care
Costs and Cost Analysis
Drug Therapy
Therapeutics
Testing
Drug therapy
Cost effectiveness

Cite this

Campbell, S., Godman, B., Diogène, E., Furst, J., Gustafsson, L., MacBride-Stewart, S., ... Wettermark, B. (2015). Quality indicators as a tool in improving the introduction of new medicines. Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, 116(2), 146-157. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcpt.12295
Campbell, Stephen ; Godman, Brian ; Diogène, Eduard ; Furst, Jurij ; Gustafsson, Lars ; MacBride-Stewart, Sean ; Malmstrom, Rickard ; Pedersen, Hanne ; Selke, Gisbert ; Vlahovic-Palcevski, Vera ; Van Woerkom, Menno ; Wong-Rieger, Durhane ; Wettermark, Björn. / Quality indicators as a tool in improving the introduction of new medicines. In: Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology. 2015 ; Vol. 116, No. 2. pp. 146-157.
@article{8b131f0823064fd8945b18c39f9e5717,
title = "Quality indicators as a tool in improving the introduction of new medicines",
abstract = "Quality indicators are increasingly used as a tool to achieve safe and quality clinical care, cost-effective therapy, for professional learning, remuneration, accreditation and financial incentives. A substantial number focus on drug therapy but few address the introduction of new medicines even though this is a burning issue. The objective was to describe the issues and challenges in designing and implementing a transparent indicator framework and evaluation protocol for the introduction of new medicines and to provide guidance on how to apply quality indicators in the managed entry of new medicines. Quality indicators need to be developed early to assess whether new medicines are introduced appropriately. A number of key factors need to be addressed when developing, applying and evaluating indicators including dimensions of quality, suggested testing protocols, potential data sources, key implementation factors such as intended and unintended consequences, budget impact and cost-effectiveness, assuring the involvement of the medical professions, patients and the public, and reliable and easy-to-use computerized tools for data collection and management. Transparent approaches include the need for any quality indicators developed to handle conflict of interests to enhance their validity and acceptance. The suggested framework and indicator testing protocol may be useful in assessing the applicability of indicators for new medicines and may be adapted to healthcare settings worldwide. The suggestions build on existing literature to create a field testing methodology that can be used to produce country-specific quality indicators for new medicines as well as a cross international approach to facilitate access to new medicines",
keywords = "Cost-Benefit Analysis, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Pharmaceutical Preparations/administration & dosage, Quality Indicators, Health Care",
author = "Stephen Campbell and Brian Godman and Eduard Diog{\`e}ne and Jurij Furst and Lars Gustafsson and Sean MacBride-Stewart and Rickard Malmstrom and Hanne Pedersen and Gisbert Selke and Vera Vlahovic-Palcevski and {Van Woerkom}, Menno and Durhane Wong-Rieger and Bj{\"o}rn Wettermark",
note = "{\circledC} 2014 Nordic Association for the Publication of BCPT (former Nordic Pharmacological Society).",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1111/bcpt.12295",
language = "English",
volume = "116",
pages = "146--157",
journal = "Pharmacology and Toxicology",
issn = "0901-9928",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

Campbell, S, Godman, B, Diogène, E, Furst, J, Gustafsson, L, MacBride-Stewart, S, Malmstrom, R, Pedersen, H, Selke, G, Vlahovic-Palcevski, V, Van Woerkom, M, Wong-Rieger, D & Wettermark, B 2015, 'Quality indicators as a tool in improving the introduction of new medicines', Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, vol. 116, no. 2, pp. 146-157. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcpt.12295

Quality indicators as a tool in improving the introduction of new medicines. / Campbell, Stephen; Godman, Brian; Diogène, Eduard; Furst, Jurij; Gustafsson, Lars; MacBride-Stewart, Sean; Malmstrom, Rickard; Pedersen, Hanne; Selke, Gisbert; Vlahovic-Palcevski, Vera; Van Woerkom, Menno; Wong-Rieger, Durhane; Wettermark, Björn.

In: Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Vol. 116, No. 2, 2015, p. 146-157.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality indicators as a tool in improving the introduction of new medicines

AU - Campbell, Stephen

AU - Godman, Brian

AU - Diogène, Eduard

AU - Furst, Jurij

AU - Gustafsson, Lars

AU - MacBride-Stewart, Sean

AU - Malmstrom, Rickard

AU - Pedersen, Hanne

AU - Selke, Gisbert

AU - Vlahovic-Palcevski, Vera

AU - Van Woerkom, Menno

AU - Wong-Rieger, Durhane

AU - Wettermark, Björn

N1 - © 2014 Nordic Association for the Publication of BCPT (former Nordic Pharmacological Society).

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Quality indicators are increasingly used as a tool to achieve safe and quality clinical care, cost-effective therapy, for professional learning, remuneration, accreditation and financial incentives. A substantial number focus on drug therapy but few address the introduction of new medicines even though this is a burning issue. The objective was to describe the issues and challenges in designing and implementing a transparent indicator framework and evaluation protocol for the introduction of new medicines and to provide guidance on how to apply quality indicators in the managed entry of new medicines. Quality indicators need to be developed early to assess whether new medicines are introduced appropriately. A number of key factors need to be addressed when developing, applying and evaluating indicators including dimensions of quality, suggested testing protocols, potential data sources, key implementation factors such as intended and unintended consequences, budget impact and cost-effectiveness, assuring the involvement of the medical professions, patients and the public, and reliable and easy-to-use computerized tools for data collection and management. Transparent approaches include the need for any quality indicators developed to handle conflict of interests to enhance their validity and acceptance. The suggested framework and indicator testing protocol may be useful in assessing the applicability of indicators for new medicines and may be adapted to healthcare settings worldwide. The suggestions build on existing literature to create a field testing methodology that can be used to produce country-specific quality indicators for new medicines as well as a cross international approach to facilitate access to new medicines

AB - Quality indicators are increasingly used as a tool to achieve safe and quality clinical care, cost-effective therapy, for professional learning, remuneration, accreditation and financial incentives. A substantial number focus on drug therapy but few address the introduction of new medicines even though this is a burning issue. The objective was to describe the issues and challenges in designing and implementing a transparent indicator framework and evaluation protocol for the introduction of new medicines and to provide guidance on how to apply quality indicators in the managed entry of new medicines. Quality indicators need to be developed early to assess whether new medicines are introduced appropriately. A number of key factors need to be addressed when developing, applying and evaluating indicators including dimensions of quality, suggested testing protocols, potential data sources, key implementation factors such as intended and unintended consequences, budget impact and cost-effectiveness, assuring the involvement of the medical professions, patients and the public, and reliable and easy-to-use computerized tools for data collection and management. Transparent approaches include the need for any quality indicators developed to handle conflict of interests to enhance their validity and acceptance. The suggested framework and indicator testing protocol may be useful in assessing the applicability of indicators for new medicines and may be adapted to healthcare settings worldwide. The suggestions build on existing literature to create a field testing methodology that can be used to produce country-specific quality indicators for new medicines as well as a cross international approach to facilitate access to new medicines

KW - Cost-Benefit Analysis

KW - Health Services Accessibility

KW - Humans

KW - Pharmaceutical Preparations/administration & dosage

KW - Quality Indicators, Health Care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921263859&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/quality-indicators-tool-improving-introduction-new-medicines-1

U2 - 10.1111/bcpt.12295

DO - 10.1111/bcpt.12295

M3 - Article

VL - 116

SP - 146

EP - 157

JO - Pharmacology and Toxicology

JF - Pharmacology and Toxicology

SN - 0901-9928

IS - 2

ER -

Campbell S, Godman B, Diogène E, Furst J, Gustafsson L, MacBride-Stewart S et al. Quality indicators as a tool in improving the introduction of new medicines. Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology. 2015;116(2):146-157. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcpt.12295