Quality is in the eye of the beholder? An evaluation of impact factors and perception of journal prestige in the UK

Jonathon Catling, Victoria Mason, Dominic UPTON

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A number of proxy measures have been used as indicators of journal quality. The most recent and commonly employed are journal impact factors. These measures are somewhat controversial, although they are frequently referred to in establishing the impact of published journal articles. Within psychology, little is known about the relationship between the 'objective' impact factors of journals and the 'subjective' ratings of prestige and perceived publishing difficulty amongst academics
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)333-345
Number of pages13
JournalScientometrics
Volume81
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

prestige
evaluation
psychology
rating

Cite this

Catling, Jonathon ; Mason, Victoria ; UPTON, Dominic. / Quality is in the eye of the beholder? An evaluation of impact factors and perception of journal prestige in the UK. In: Scientometrics. 2008 ; Vol. 81, No. 2. pp. 333-345.
@article{414b68b1575043c5911aa19be0608873,
title = "Quality is in the eye of the beholder? An evaluation of impact factors and perception of journal prestige in the UK",
abstract = "A number of proxy measures have been used as indicators of journal quality. The most recent and commonly employed are journal impact factors. These measures are somewhat controversial, although they are frequently referred to in establishing the impact of published journal articles. Within psychology, little is known about the relationship between the 'objective' impact factors of journals and the 'subjective' ratings of prestige and perceived publishing difficulty amongst academics",
keywords = "indicators, journal ranking, quality, psychology, cognitive, impact factor",
author = "Jonathon Catling and Victoria Mason and Dominic UPTON",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1007/s11192-009-2124-1",
language = "English",
volume = "81",
pages = "333--345",
journal = "Scientometrics",
issn = "0138-9130",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "2",

}

Quality is in the eye of the beholder? An evaluation of impact factors and perception of journal prestige in the UK. / Catling, Jonathon; Mason, Victoria; UPTON, Dominic.

In: Scientometrics, Vol. 81, No. 2, 2008, p. 333-345.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality is in the eye of the beholder? An evaluation of impact factors and perception of journal prestige in the UK

AU - Catling, Jonathon

AU - Mason, Victoria

AU - UPTON, Dominic

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - A number of proxy measures have been used as indicators of journal quality. The most recent and commonly employed are journal impact factors. These measures are somewhat controversial, although they are frequently referred to in establishing the impact of published journal articles. Within psychology, little is known about the relationship between the 'objective' impact factors of journals and the 'subjective' ratings of prestige and perceived publishing difficulty amongst academics

AB - A number of proxy measures have been used as indicators of journal quality. The most recent and commonly employed are journal impact factors. These measures are somewhat controversial, although they are frequently referred to in establishing the impact of published journal articles. Within psychology, little is known about the relationship between the 'objective' impact factors of journals and the 'subjective' ratings of prestige and perceived publishing difficulty amongst academics

KW - indicators

KW - journal ranking

KW - quality

KW - psychology

KW - cognitive

KW - impact factor

U2 - 10.1007/s11192-009-2124-1

DO - 10.1007/s11192-009-2124-1

M3 - Article

VL - 81

SP - 333

EP - 345

JO - Scientometrics

JF - Scientometrics

SN - 0138-9130

IS - 2

ER -