Quantitative Analysis of Desirability in User Experience


    Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookConference contributionpeer-review

    46 Downloads (Pure)


    The multi-dimensional nature of user experience warrants a rigorous assessment of the interactive experience in systems. User experience assessments are based on product evaluations and subsequent analysis of the collected data using quantitative and qualitative techniques. The quality of user experience assessments is dependent on the effectiveness of the techniques deployed. This paper presents the results of a quantitative analysis of desirability aspects of the user experience in a comparative product evaluation study. The data collection was conducted using 118 item Microsoft Product Reaction Cards (PRC) tool followed by data analysis based on the Surface Measure of Overall Performance (SMOP) approach. The results of this study suggest that the incorporation of SMOP as an approach for PRC data analysis derive conclusive evidence of desirability in user experience. The significance of the paper is that it presents a novel analysis method incorporating product reaction cards and surface measure of overall performance approach for an effective quantitative analysis which can be used in academic research and industrial practice.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationThe 26th Australasian Conference on Information Systems(ACIS 2015) : Proceedings
    EditorsFrada Burstein, Helana Scheepers, Gaye Deegan
    Place of PublicationOnline
    Number of pages11
    ISBN (Print)9780646953373
    Publication statusPublished - 2016
    EventAustralasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS 2015) - Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
    Duration: 30 Nov 20154 Dec 2015


    ConferenceAustralasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS 2015)
    Abbreviated titleACIS 2015

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Quantitative Analysis of Desirability in User Experience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this