TY - JOUR
T1 - Réponses riveraines à la réduction des débits de crue
T2 - Comparaison et différences entre peupliers à feuilles larges et à feuilles étroites
AU - Wilding, T.K.
AU - Sanderson, Barbara J S
AU - Merritt, D.M.
AU - Rood, S.B.
AU - POFF, LeRoy
N1 - cited By 7
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - To enable assessment of risks of water management to riparian ecosystems at a regional scale, we developed a quantile-regression model of abundance of broadleaf cottonwoods (Populus deltoides and P. fremontii) as a function of flood flow attenuation. To test whether this model was transferrable to narrowleaf cottonwood (Populus angustifolia), we measured narrowleaf abundance along 39 river reaches in northwestern Colorado, USA. The model performed well for narrowleaf in all 32 reaches where reservoir storage was <75% of mean annual flow. Field data did not fit the model at four of seven reaches where reservoir storage was >90% of mean annual flow. In these four reaches, narrowleaf was abundant despite peak flow attenuation of 45-61%. Poor model performance in these four reaches may be explained in part by a pulse of narrowleaf cottonwood expansion as a response to channel narrowing and in part by differences between narrowleaf and broadleaf cottonwood response to floods and drought. Editor Z.W. Kundzewicz; Guest editor M. AcremanCitation Wilding, T.K. Sanderson, J.S. Merritt, D.M. Rood, S.B. and Poff, N.L. 2014. Riparian responses to reduced flood flows: comparing and contrasting narrowleaf and broadleaf cottonwoods. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 59 (3-4), 605-617.
AB - To enable assessment of risks of water management to riparian ecosystems at a regional scale, we developed a quantile-regression model of abundance of broadleaf cottonwoods (Populus deltoides and P. fremontii) as a function of flood flow attenuation. To test whether this model was transferrable to narrowleaf cottonwood (Populus angustifolia), we measured narrowleaf abundance along 39 river reaches in northwestern Colorado, USA. The model performed well for narrowleaf in all 32 reaches where reservoir storage was <75% of mean annual flow. Field data did not fit the model at four of seven reaches where reservoir storage was >90% of mean annual flow. In these four reaches, narrowleaf was abundant despite peak flow attenuation of 45-61%. Poor model performance in these four reaches may be explained in part by a pulse of narrowleaf cottonwood expansion as a response to channel narrowing and in part by differences between narrowleaf and broadleaf cottonwood response to floods and drought. Editor Z.W. Kundzewicz; Guest editor M. AcremanCitation Wilding, T.K. Sanderson, J.S. Merritt, D.M. Rood, S.B. and Poff, N.L. 2014. Riparian responses to reduced flood flows: comparing and contrasting narrowleaf and broadleaf cottonwoods. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 59 (3-4), 605-617.
KW - Populus
KW - cottonwood
KW - ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA)
KW - environmental flows
KW - flow alteration
KW - index of flow modification (IFM)
KW - riparian vegetation
KW - streamflow management
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901695958&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/r%C3%A9ponses-riveraines-%C3%A0-la-r%C3%A9duction-des-d%C3%A9bits-crue-comparaison-et-diff%C3%A9rences-entre-peupliers-%C3%A0-feui
U2 - 10.1080/02626667.2014.880786
DO - 10.1080/02626667.2014.880786
M3 - Article
SN - 0262-6667
VL - 59
SP - 605
EP - 617
JO - Hydrological Sciences Journal
JF - Hydrological Sciences Journal
IS - 3-4
ER -