Rankings in professional men's tennis

A rich but underutilized source of information

Machar Reid, Stuart Morgan, Tania Churchill, Michael Bane

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Success in professional tennis is measured, at least in part, by rankings. However, there is little quantitative evidence to inform stakeholders regarding what represents the typical ranking progress of top-ranked players. The objective of this study was therefore to compare the ranking trajectories of male players whom achieved peak professional rankings in the Top 250, 175, 100, 50, 20 and 10. The 11,396 birthdates and weekly professional rankings of all players between 27 August 1973 and 31 October 2011 were collated. The peak ranks for each athlete according to their both chronological age and number of years on tour were identified and athletes were categorised into one of six career-peak ranking bands. One-way analysis of variance tests confirmed distinctive ranking trajectories, which were most pronounced among Top 10 players. The rankings of these players were statistically distinguishable following players' second year on tour or by 17 years of age. The ranking signature of all Top 100 players emerged as significantly different to players that failed to enter the Top 100 by their fourth year on the tour. Indeed, the representation of ranking as a function of years on tour should be considered for use by tennis policy-makers in the future.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)986-992
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Sports Sciences
Volume32
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Tennis
Athletes
Administrative Personnel
Analysis of Variance

Cite this

Reid, Machar ; Morgan, Stuart ; Churchill, Tania ; Bane, Michael. / Rankings in professional men's tennis : A rich but underutilized source of information. In: Journal of Sports Sciences. 2014 ; Vol. 32, No. 10. pp. 986-992.
@article{e4c9d208404c4558af1ab1997e1da7f0,
title = "Rankings in professional men's tennis: A rich but underutilized source of information",
abstract = "Success in professional tennis is measured, at least in part, by rankings. However, there is little quantitative evidence to inform stakeholders regarding what represents the typical ranking progress of top-ranked players. The objective of this study was therefore to compare the ranking trajectories of male players whom achieved peak professional rankings in the Top 250, 175, 100, 50, 20 and 10. The 11,396 birthdates and weekly professional rankings of all players between 27 August 1973 and 31 October 2011 were collated. The peak ranks for each athlete according to their both chronological age and number of years on tour were identified and athletes were categorised into one of six career-peak ranking bands. One-way analysis of variance tests confirmed distinctive ranking trajectories, which were most pronounced among Top 10 players. The rankings of these players were statistically distinguishable following players' second year on tour or by 17 years of age. The ranking signature of all Top 100 players emerged as significantly different to players that failed to enter the Top 100 by their fourth year on the tour. Indeed, the representation of ranking as a function of years on tour should be considered for use by tennis policy-makers in the future.",
keywords = "analytics, player development, tennis",
author = "Machar Reid and Stuart Morgan and Tania Churchill and Michael Bane",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/02640414.2013.876086",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "986--992",
journal = "Journal of Sports Science",
issn = "0264-0414",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "10",

}

Rankings in professional men's tennis : A rich but underutilized source of information. / Reid, Machar; Morgan, Stuart; Churchill, Tania; Bane, Michael.

In: Journal of Sports Sciences, Vol. 32, No. 10, 2014, p. 986-992.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rankings in professional men's tennis

T2 - A rich but underutilized source of information

AU - Reid, Machar

AU - Morgan, Stuart

AU - Churchill, Tania

AU - Bane, Michael

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Success in professional tennis is measured, at least in part, by rankings. However, there is little quantitative evidence to inform stakeholders regarding what represents the typical ranking progress of top-ranked players. The objective of this study was therefore to compare the ranking trajectories of male players whom achieved peak professional rankings in the Top 250, 175, 100, 50, 20 and 10. The 11,396 birthdates and weekly professional rankings of all players between 27 August 1973 and 31 October 2011 were collated. The peak ranks for each athlete according to their both chronological age and number of years on tour were identified and athletes were categorised into one of six career-peak ranking bands. One-way analysis of variance tests confirmed distinctive ranking trajectories, which were most pronounced among Top 10 players. The rankings of these players were statistically distinguishable following players' second year on tour or by 17 years of age. The ranking signature of all Top 100 players emerged as significantly different to players that failed to enter the Top 100 by their fourth year on the tour. Indeed, the representation of ranking as a function of years on tour should be considered for use by tennis policy-makers in the future.

AB - Success in professional tennis is measured, at least in part, by rankings. However, there is little quantitative evidence to inform stakeholders regarding what represents the typical ranking progress of top-ranked players. The objective of this study was therefore to compare the ranking trajectories of male players whom achieved peak professional rankings in the Top 250, 175, 100, 50, 20 and 10. The 11,396 birthdates and weekly professional rankings of all players between 27 August 1973 and 31 October 2011 were collated. The peak ranks for each athlete according to their both chronological age and number of years on tour were identified and athletes were categorised into one of six career-peak ranking bands. One-way analysis of variance tests confirmed distinctive ranking trajectories, which were most pronounced among Top 10 players. The rankings of these players were statistically distinguishable following players' second year on tour or by 17 years of age. The ranking signature of all Top 100 players emerged as significantly different to players that failed to enter the Top 100 by their fourth year on the tour. Indeed, the representation of ranking as a function of years on tour should be considered for use by tennis policy-makers in the future.

KW - analytics

KW - player development

KW - tennis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896492659&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/rankings-professional-mens-tennis-rich-underutilized-source-information

U2 - 10.1080/02640414.2013.876086

DO - 10.1080/02640414.2013.876086

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 986

EP - 992

JO - Journal of Sports Science

JF - Journal of Sports Science

SN - 0264-0414

IS - 10

ER -