TY - JOUR
T1 - Rating health and social indicators for use with indigenous communities: A tool for balancing cultural and scientific utility
AU - Daniel, Mark
AU - Cargo, Margaret
AU - Marks, Elisabeth
AU - Paquet, Catherine
AU - Simmons, David
AU - Williams, Margaret
AU - Rowley, Kevin G.
AU - O'Dea, Kerin
PY - 2009/11
Y1 - 2009/11
N2 - This study reports on the development and evaluation of a rating tool to assess the scientific utility and cultural appropriateness of community-level indicators for application with Indigenous populations. Indicator criteria proposed by the U.S. Institute of Medicine were culturally adapted through reviewing the literature and consultations with academic and Indigenous stakeholders. Pre-testing and collaborator feedback drove the iterative development of the tool with stakeholder groups in Canada, Aotearoa/New Zealand, and Australia. Pilot testing with 17 raters across countries involved rating the same selection of six health and social indicators using a six-point ordinal scale. The final version of the rating tool includes 16 questions within three criterion domains: importance, soundness, and viability. Academic and community stakeholder review established face and content validity. The indicator rating tool demonstrated good internal consistency and excellent inter-rater reliability for two of three pilot testing groups. Use of this instrument can strengthen collaborative research planning and evaluation with Indigenous communities through selection of relevant and culturally appropriate indicators for application to public health research, prevention programmes, and health and social policy.
AB - This study reports on the development and evaluation of a rating tool to assess the scientific utility and cultural appropriateness of community-level indicators for application with Indigenous populations. Indicator criteria proposed by the U.S. Institute of Medicine were culturally adapted through reviewing the literature and consultations with academic and Indigenous stakeholders. Pre-testing and collaborator feedback drove the iterative development of the tool with stakeholder groups in Canada, Aotearoa/New Zealand, and Australia. Pilot testing with 17 raters across countries involved rating the same selection of six health and social indicators using a six-point ordinal scale. The final version of the rating tool includes 16 questions within three criterion domains: importance, soundness, and viability. Academic and community stakeholder review established face and content validity. The indicator rating tool demonstrated good internal consistency and excellent inter-rater reliability for two of three pilot testing groups. Use of this instrument can strengthen collaborative research planning and evaluation with Indigenous communities through selection of relevant and culturally appropriate indicators for application to public health research, prevention programmes, and health and social policy.
KW - Community participation
KW - Health status indicators
KW - Indigenous populations
KW - Programme planning
KW - Reliability and validity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349754554&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11205-008-9420-7
DO - 10.1007/s11205-008-9420-7
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:70349754554
SN - 0303-8300
VL - 94
SP - 241
EP - 256
JO - Social Indicators Research
JF - Social Indicators Research
IS - 2
ER -