Rating health and social indicators for use with indigenous communities: A tool for balancing cultural and scientific utility

Mark Daniel, Margaret Cargo, Elisabeth Marks, Catherine Paquet, David Simmons, Margaret Williams, Kevin G. Rowley, Kerin O'Dea

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study reports on the development and evaluation of a rating tool to assess the scientific utility and cultural appropriateness of community-level indicators for application with Indigenous populations. Indicator criteria proposed by the U.S. Institute of Medicine were culturally adapted through reviewing the literature and consultations with academic and Indigenous stakeholders. Pre-testing and collaborator feedback drove the iterative development of the tool with stakeholder groups in Canada, Aotearoa/New Zealand, and Australia. Pilot testing with 17 raters across countries involved rating the same selection of six health and social indicators using a six-point ordinal scale. The final version of the rating tool includes 16 questions within three criterion domains: importance, soundness, and viability. Academic and community stakeholder review established face and content validity. The indicator rating tool demonstrated good internal consistency and excellent inter-rater reliability for two of three pilot testing groups. Use of this instrument can strengthen collaborative research planning and evaluation with Indigenous communities through selection of relevant and culturally appropriate indicators for application to public health research, prevention programmes, and health and social policy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)241-256
Number of pages16
JournalSocial Indicators Research
Volume94
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

social indicators
rating
stakeholder
Health
health
community
National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.) Health and Medicine Division
Public Policy
Health Policy
New Zealand
Population Groups
Reproducibility of Results
Canada
Referral and Consultation
Public Health
evaluation
health policy
research planning
Group
public health

Cite this

Daniel, Mark ; Cargo, Margaret ; Marks, Elisabeth ; Paquet, Catherine ; Simmons, David ; Williams, Margaret ; Rowley, Kevin G. ; O'Dea, Kerin. / Rating health and social indicators for use with indigenous communities: A tool for balancing cultural and scientific utility. In: Social Indicators Research. 2009 ; Vol. 94, No. 2. pp. 241-256.
@article{0fec6ff31eab4cd2a933a7ba6a3a43f2,
title = "Rating health and social indicators for use with indigenous communities: A tool for balancing cultural and scientific utility",
abstract = "This study reports on the development and evaluation of a rating tool to assess the scientific utility and cultural appropriateness of community-level indicators for application with Indigenous populations. Indicator criteria proposed by the U.S. Institute of Medicine were culturally adapted through reviewing the literature and consultations with academic and Indigenous stakeholders. Pre-testing and collaborator feedback drove the iterative development of the tool with stakeholder groups in Canada, Aotearoa/New Zealand, and Australia. Pilot testing with 17 raters across countries involved rating the same selection of six health and social indicators using a six-point ordinal scale. The final version of the rating tool includes 16 questions within three criterion domains: importance, soundness, and viability. Academic and community stakeholder review established face and content validity. The indicator rating tool demonstrated good internal consistency and excellent inter-rater reliability for two of three pilot testing groups. Use of this instrument can strengthen collaborative research planning and evaluation with Indigenous communities through selection of relevant and culturally appropriate indicators for application to public health research, prevention programmes, and health and social policy.",
keywords = "Community participation, Health status indicators, Indigenous populations, Programme planning, Reliability and validity",
author = "Mark Daniel and Margaret Cargo and Elisabeth Marks and Catherine Paquet and David Simmons and Margaret Williams and Rowley, {Kevin G.} and Kerin O'Dea",
year = "2009",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1007/s11205-008-9420-7",
language = "English",
volume = "94",
pages = "241--256",
journal = "Social Indicators Research",
issn = "0303-8300",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "2",

}

Rating health and social indicators for use with indigenous communities: A tool for balancing cultural and scientific utility. / Daniel, Mark; Cargo, Margaret; Marks, Elisabeth; Paquet, Catherine; Simmons, David; Williams, Margaret; Rowley, Kevin G.; O'Dea, Kerin.

In: Social Indicators Research, Vol. 94, No. 2, 11.2009, p. 241-256.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rating health and social indicators for use with indigenous communities: A tool for balancing cultural and scientific utility

AU - Daniel, Mark

AU - Cargo, Margaret

AU - Marks, Elisabeth

AU - Paquet, Catherine

AU - Simmons, David

AU - Williams, Margaret

AU - Rowley, Kevin G.

AU - O'Dea, Kerin

PY - 2009/11

Y1 - 2009/11

N2 - This study reports on the development and evaluation of a rating tool to assess the scientific utility and cultural appropriateness of community-level indicators for application with Indigenous populations. Indicator criteria proposed by the U.S. Institute of Medicine were culturally adapted through reviewing the literature and consultations with academic and Indigenous stakeholders. Pre-testing and collaborator feedback drove the iterative development of the tool with stakeholder groups in Canada, Aotearoa/New Zealand, and Australia. Pilot testing with 17 raters across countries involved rating the same selection of six health and social indicators using a six-point ordinal scale. The final version of the rating tool includes 16 questions within three criterion domains: importance, soundness, and viability. Academic and community stakeholder review established face and content validity. The indicator rating tool demonstrated good internal consistency and excellent inter-rater reliability for two of three pilot testing groups. Use of this instrument can strengthen collaborative research planning and evaluation with Indigenous communities through selection of relevant and culturally appropriate indicators for application to public health research, prevention programmes, and health and social policy.

AB - This study reports on the development and evaluation of a rating tool to assess the scientific utility and cultural appropriateness of community-level indicators for application with Indigenous populations. Indicator criteria proposed by the U.S. Institute of Medicine were culturally adapted through reviewing the literature and consultations with academic and Indigenous stakeholders. Pre-testing and collaborator feedback drove the iterative development of the tool with stakeholder groups in Canada, Aotearoa/New Zealand, and Australia. Pilot testing with 17 raters across countries involved rating the same selection of six health and social indicators using a six-point ordinal scale. The final version of the rating tool includes 16 questions within three criterion domains: importance, soundness, and viability. Academic and community stakeholder review established face and content validity. The indicator rating tool demonstrated good internal consistency and excellent inter-rater reliability for two of three pilot testing groups. Use of this instrument can strengthen collaborative research planning and evaluation with Indigenous communities through selection of relevant and culturally appropriate indicators for application to public health research, prevention programmes, and health and social policy.

KW - Community participation

KW - Health status indicators

KW - Indigenous populations

KW - Programme planning

KW - Reliability and validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349754554&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11205-008-9420-7

DO - 10.1007/s11205-008-9420-7

M3 - Article

VL - 94

SP - 241

EP - 256

JO - Social Indicators Research

JF - Social Indicators Research

SN - 0303-8300

IS - 2

ER -