Re-embedding economies in ecologies: resilience building in more than human communities

J.K. Gibson-Graham, Ann HILL, Lisa Law

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The modern hyper-separation of economy from ecology has severed the ties that people have with environments and species that sustain life. A first step towards strengthening resilience at a human scale involves appreciating, caring for and repairing the longstanding ecological relationships that have supported life over the millennia. The capacity to appreciate these relationships has, however, been diminished by a utilitarian positioning of natural environments by economic science. Ecologists have gone further in capturing the interdependence of economies and ecologies with the concept of socio-ecological resilience. Of concern, however, is the persistence of a vision of an economy ordered by market determinations in which there is no role for ethical negotiation between humans and with the non-human world. This paper reframes economy–ecology relations, resituating humans within ecological communities and resituating non-humans in ethical terms. It advances the idea of community economies (as opposed to capitalist economies) and argues that these must be built if we are to sustain life in the Anthropocene. The argument is illustrated with reference to two construction projects situated in ‘Monsoon Asia’
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)703-716
Number of pages14
JournalBuilding Research and Information
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ecology
Ecosystems
Economics

Cite this

@article{78a1d746639b4c559397f29f1c3805af,
title = "Re-embedding economies in ecologies: resilience building in more than human communities",
abstract = "The modern hyper-separation of economy from ecology has severed the ties that people have with environments and species that sustain life. A first step towards strengthening resilience at a human scale involves appreciating, caring for and repairing the longstanding ecological relationships that have supported life over the millennia. The capacity to appreciate these relationships has, however, been diminished by a utilitarian positioning of natural environments by economic science. Ecologists have gone further in capturing the interdependence of economies and ecologies with the concept of socio-ecological resilience. Of concern, however, is the persistence of a vision of an economy ordered by market determinations in which there is no role for ethical negotiation between humans and with the non-human world. This paper reframes economy–ecology relations, resituating humans within ecological communities and resituating non-humans in ethical terms. It advances the idea of community economies (as opposed to capitalist economies) and argues that these must be built if we are to sustain life in the Anthropocene. The argument is illustrated with reference to two construction projects situated in ‘Monsoon Asia’",
keywords = "built-environment, climate-change, communities, ethical-behavior, ethics, local-economy, local-resilience, negotiations, resilience",
author = "J.K. Gibson-Graham and Ann HILL and Lisa Law",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/09613218.2016.1213059",
language = "English",
pages = "703--716",
journal = "Building Research and Information",
issn = "0182-3329",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

}

Re-embedding economies in ecologies: resilience building in more than human communities. / Gibson-Graham, J.K.; HILL, Ann; Law, Lisa.

In: Building Research and Information, 2016, p. 703-716.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Re-embedding economies in ecologies: resilience building in more than human communities

AU - Gibson-Graham, J.K.

AU - HILL, Ann

AU - Law, Lisa

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The modern hyper-separation of economy from ecology has severed the ties that people have with environments and species that sustain life. A first step towards strengthening resilience at a human scale involves appreciating, caring for and repairing the longstanding ecological relationships that have supported life over the millennia. The capacity to appreciate these relationships has, however, been diminished by a utilitarian positioning of natural environments by economic science. Ecologists have gone further in capturing the interdependence of economies and ecologies with the concept of socio-ecological resilience. Of concern, however, is the persistence of a vision of an economy ordered by market determinations in which there is no role for ethical negotiation between humans and with the non-human world. This paper reframes economy–ecology relations, resituating humans within ecological communities and resituating non-humans in ethical terms. It advances the idea of community economies (as opposed to capitalist economies) and argues that these must be built if we are to sustain life in the Anthropocene. The argument is illustrated with reference to two construction projects situated in ‘Monsoon Asia’

AB - The modern hyper-separation of economy from ecology has severed the ties that people have with environments and species that sustain life. A first step towards strengthening resilience at a human scale involves appreciating, caring for and repairing the longstanding ecological relationships that have supported life over the millennia. The capacity to appreciate these relationships has, however, been diminished by a utilitarian positioning of natural environments by economic science. Ecologists have gone further in capturing the interdependence of economies and ecologies with the concept of socio-ecological resilience. Of concern, however, is the persistence of a vision of an economy ordered by market determinations in which there is no role for ethical negotiation between humans and with the non-human world. This paper reframes economy–ecology relations, resituating humans within ecological communities and resituating non-humans in ethical terms. It advances the idea of community economies (as opposed to capitalist economies) and argues that these must be built if we are to sustain life in the Anthropocene. The argument is illustrated with reference to two construction projects situated in ‘Monsoon Asia’

KW - built-environment

KW - climate-change

KW - communities

KW - ethical-behavior

KW - ethics

KW - local-economy

KW - local-resilience

KW - negotiations

KW - resilience

U2 - 10.1080/09613218.2016.1213059

DO - 10.1080/09613218.2016.1213059

M3 - Article

SP - 703

EP - 716

JO - Building Research and Information

JF - Building Research and Information

SN - 0182-3329

ER -