Real, not Nominal, Global Democracy: A Reply to Robert Keohane

Jonathan Kuyper, John DRYZEK

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    1 Citation (Scopus)
    4 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    In a recent article for this journal, Robert Keohane argues against the possibility and promise of global democracy.1 Drawing upon Krasner’s notion of “organized hypo crisy,” Keohane suggests that democracy in global governance is merely a norm without substantive practice. Efforts to develop global democracy without creating the necessary preconditions will lead to a hollow nominal global democracy. ... Keohane is not actually hostile to the normative value of democracy in global governance. Indeed, his dismissal of global democracy in the short term is accompanied in his exposition by hope for the long term. However, this short term/long term distinction obscures the way arguments for global democracy are now in fact made (it is noteworthy that Keohane does not cite any actual contemporary proponent of global democracy, criticizing...
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)930-937
    Number of pages8
    JournalInternational Journal of Constitutional Law
    Volume14
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Fingerprint

    democracy
    global governance
    dismissal
    Values

    Cite this

    @article{7a9c49467c0445a49eb616e4e69105bd,
    title = "Real, not Nominal, Global Democracy: A Reply to Robert Keohane",
    abstract = "In a recent article for this journal, Robert Keohane argues against the possibility and promise of global democracy.1 Drawing upon Krasner’s notion of “organized hypo crisy,” Keohane suggests that democracy in global governance is merely a norm without substantive practice. Efforts to develop global democracy without creating the necessary preconditions will lead to a hollow nominal global democracy. ... Keohane is not actually hostile to the normative value of democracy in global governance. Indeed, his dismissal of global democracy in the short term is accompanied in his exposition by hope for the long term. However, this short term/long term distinction obscures the way arguments for global democracy are now in fact made (it is noteworthy that Keohane does not cite any actual contemporary proponent of global democracy, criticizing...",
    author = "Jonathan Kuyper and John DRYZEK",
    year = "2016",
    doi = "10.1093/icon/mow063",
    language = "English",
    volume = "14",
    pages = "930--937",
    journal = "International Journal of Constitutional Law",
    issn = "1474-2640",
    publisher = "Oxford University Press",
    number = "4",

    }

    Real, not Nominal, Global Democracy: A Reply to Robert Keohane. / Kuyper, Jonathan; DRYZEK, John.

    In: International Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2016, p. 930-937.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Real, not Nominal, Global Democracy: A Reply to Robert Keohane

    AU - Kuyper, Jonathan

    AU - DRYZEK, John

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - In a recent article for this journal, Robert Keohane argues against the possibility and promise of global democracy.1 Drawing upon Krasner’s notion of “organized hypo crisy,” Keohane suggests that democracy in global governance is merely a norm without substantive practice. Efforts to develop global democracy without creating the necessary preconditions will lead to a hollow nominal global democracy. ... Keohane is not actually hostile to the normative value of democracy in global governance. Indeed, his dismissal of global democracy in the short term is accompanied in his exposition by hope for the long term. However, this short term/long term distinction obscures the way arguments for global democracy are now in fact made (it is noteworthy that Keohane does not cite any actual contemporary proponent of global democracy, criticizing...

    AB - In a recent article for this journal, Robert Keohane argues against the possibility and promise of global democracy.1 Drawing upon Krasner’s notion of “organized hypo crisy,” Keohane suggests that democracy in global governance is merely a norm without substantive practice. Efforts to develop global democracy without creating the necessary preconditions will lead to a hollow nominal global democracy. ... Keohane is not actually hostile to the normative value of democracy in global governance. Indeed, his dismissal of global democracy in the short term is accompanied in his exposition by hope for the long term. However, this short term/long term distinction obscures the way arguments for global democracy are now in fact made (it is noteworthy that Keohane does not cite any actual contemporary proponent of global democracy, criticizing...

    U2 - 10.1093/icon/mow063

    DO - 10.1093/icon/mow063

    M3 - Article

    VL - 14

    SP - 930

    EP - 937

    JO - International Journal of Constitutional Law

    JF - International Journal of Constitutional Law

    SN - 1474-2640

    IS - 4

    ER -