Reason and rhetoric in climate communication

John DRYZEK, Alex Lo

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    21 Citations (Scopus)
    5 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Rhetoric can facilitate movement beyond impasse on whether and how to confront climate change, enabling more effective public reasoning. Our evidence comes from a small deliberative group that contained climate-change deniers. We show how, in this setting, bridging rhetoric (capable of reaching those who do not share the speaker’s perspective) managed to bring deniers and others into accepting that particular greenhouse-gas mitigation measures were in the range of acceptable policy choices – even as deniers continued to dispute the existence of anthropogenic climate change. What we observed drives home the need for rhetorical bridges in broader public debates on climate change.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1-16
    Number of pages16
    JournalEnvironmental Politics
    Volume24
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Fingerprint

    rhetoric
    climate change
    climate
    communication
    greenhouse gas
    evidence
    Group
    public

    Cite this

    DRYZEK, John ; Lo, Alex. / Reason and rhetoric in climate communication. In: Environmental Politics. 2015 ; Vol. 24, No. 1. pp. 1-16.
    @article{9881a8c61a724bc5a3de59236d363708,
    title = "Reason and rhetoric in climate communication",
    abstract = "Rhetoric can facilitate movement beyond impasse on whether and how to confront climate change, enabling more effective public reasoning. Our evidence comes from a small deliberative group that contained climate-change deniers. We show how, in this setting, bridging rhetoric (capable of reaching those who do not share the speaker’s perspective) managed to bring deniers and others into accepting that particular greenhouse-gas mitigation measures were in the range of acceptable policy choices – even as deniers continued to dispute the existence of anthropogenic climate change. What we observed drives home the need for rhetorical bridges in broader public debates on climate change.",
    keywords = "rhetoric, climate change, climate sceptics, climate-change, deniers, deliberative democracy, climate-change deniers",
    author = "John DRYZEK and Alex Lo",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.1080/09644016.2014.961273",
    language = "English",
    volume = "24",
    pages = "1--16",
    journal = "Environmental Politics",
    issn = "0964-4016",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "1",

    }

    Reason and rhetoric in climate communication. / DRYZEK, John; Lo, Alex.

    In: Environmental Politics, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2015, p. 1-16.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Reason and rhetoric in climate communication

    AU - DRYZEK, John

    AU - Lo, Alex

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - Rhetoric can facilitate movement beyond impasse on whether and how to confront climate change, enabling more effective public reasoning. Our evidence comes from a small deliberative group that contained climate-change deniers. We show how, in this setting, bridging rhetoric (capable of reaching those who do not share the speaker’s perspective) managed to bring deniers and others into accepting that particular greenhouse-gas mitigation measures were in the range of acceptable policy choices – even as deniers continued to dispute the existence of anthropogenic climate change. What we observed drives home the need for rhetorical bridges in broader public debates on climate change.

    AB - Rhetoric can facilitate movement beyond impasse on whether and how to confront climate change, enabling more effective public reasoning. Our evidence comes from a small deliberative group that contained climate-change deniers. We show how, in this setting, bridging rhetoric (capable of reaching those who do not share the speaker’s perspective) managed to bring deniers and others into accepting that particular greenhouse-gas mitigation measures were in the range of acceptable policy choices – even as deniers continued to dispute the existence of anthropogenic climate change. What we observed drives home the need for rhetorical bridges in broader public debates on climate change.

    KW - rhetoric

    KW - climate change

    KW - climate sceptics

    KW - climate-change

    KW - deniers

    KW - deliberative democracy

    KW - climate-change deniers

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921844838&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/reason-rhetoric-climate-communication

    U2 - 10.1080/09644016.2014.961273

    DO - 10.1080/09644016.2014.961273

    M3 - Article

    VL - 24

    SP - 1

    EP - 16

    JO - Environmental Politics

    JF - Environmental Politics

    SN - 0964-4016

    IS - 1

    ER -