Recognition acuity in children measured using The Auckland Optotypes

Lisa M. Hamm, Nicola ANSTICE, Joanna M. Black, Steven C. Dakin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Sloan letters displayed by the Electronic Visual Acuity (EVA) system are the gold standard for recognition acuity measurement in research settings. However, letters are not always appropriate for children. The Auckland Optotypes (TAO) are a new, open-access set of 10 pictograms available in regular and vanishing formats. We sought to assess feasibility of using both formats of TAO for measuring visual acuity (VA) in children using a Bayesian adaptive staircase, in a community setting. Methods: We tested 121 children (5–12 years old) with both formats of TAO, a handheld flipchart vision screener (Parr vision test), as well as the gold standard EVA. We measured feasibility of the three comparison tests in three ways. First, using limits of agreement (LoA) with EVA, second, calculating area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and finally, investigating trial-by-trial responses. Results: Agreement between tests was within test-retest reliability of EVA measures (LoA TAO regular = ±0.14, LoA TAO vanishing = ±0.15, LoA P arr = ±0.16 logMAR). TAO tests were highly effective at identifying children with vision impairment (AUC TAO regular = 0.96, AUC TAO vanishing = 0.95), whereas Parr was less effective (AUC P arr = 0.82). In 5–6 year old children there was an enhanced advantage of TAO (AUC TAO regular = 0.97, AUC TAO vanishing = 0.98) over Parr (AUC P arr = 0.75). Although each child completed 16 trials, approximately 10 trials were sufficient to achieve excellent LoA, and six trials sufficient for accurate screening. Conclusion: Threshold VA assessment and vision screening are feasible using both vanishing and regular formats of TAO.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)596-608
Number of pages13
JournalOphthalmic and Physiological Optics
Volume38
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Area Under Curve
Visual Acuity
Vision Screening
Vision Tests
Recognition (Psychology)
Reproducibility of Results
ROC Curve
Research

Cite this

Hamm, Lisa M. ; ANSTICE, Nicola ; Black, Joanna M. ; Dakin, Steven C. / Recognition acuity in children measured using The Auckland Optotypes. In: Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 2018 ; Vol. 38, No. 6. pp. 596-608.
@article{d6ced1babbd946debb348317e0e4da8a,
title = "Recognition acuity in children measured using The Auckland Optotypes",
abstract = "Purpose: Sloan letters displayed by the Electronic Visual Acuity (EVA) system are the gold standard for recognition acuity measurement in research settings. However, letters are not always appropriate for children. The Auckland Optotypes (TAO) are a new, open-access set of 10 pictograms available in regular and vanishing formats. We sought to assess feasibility of using both formats of TAO for measuring visual acuity (VA) in children using a Bayesian adaptive staircase, in a community setting. Methods: We tested 121 children (5–12 years old) with both formats of TAO, a handheld flipchart vision screener (Parr vision test), as well as the gold standard EVA. We measured feasibility of the three comparison tests in three ways. First, using limits of agreement (LoA) with EVA, second, calculating area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and finally, investigating trial-by-trial responses. Results: Agreement between tests was within test-retest reliability of EVA measures (LoA TAO regular = ±0.14, LoA TAO vanishing = ±0.15, LoA P arr = ±0.16 logMAR). TAO tests were highly effective at identifying children with vision impairment (AUC TAO regular = 0.96, AUC TAO vanishing = 0.95), whereas Parr was less effective (AUC P arr = 0.82). In 5–6 year old children there was an enhanced advantage of TAO (AUC TAO regular = 0.97, AUC TAO vanishing = 0.98) over Parr (AUC P arr = 0.75). Although each child completed 16 trials, approximately 10 trials were sufficient to achieve excellent LoA, and six trials sufficient for accurate screening. Conclusion: Threshold VA assessment and vision screening are feasible using both vanishing and regular formats of TAO.",
keywords = "acuity, agreement, children, optotypes, psychophysics, screening",
author = "Hamm, {Lisa M.} and Nicola ANSTICE and Black, {Joanna M.} and Dakin, {Steven C.}",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1111/opo.12590",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "596--608",
journal = "British Journal of Physiological Optics",
issn = "0275-5408",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

Recognition acuity in children measured using The Auckland Optotypes. / Hamm, Lisa M.; ANSTICE, Nicola; Black, Joanna M.; Dakin, Steven C.

In: Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, Vol. 38, No. 6, 2018, p. 596-608.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recognition acuity in children measured using The Auckland Optotypes

AU - Hamm, Lisa M.

AU - ANSTICE, Nicola

AU - Black, Joanna M.

AU - Dakin, Steven C.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Purpose: Sloan letters displayed by the Electronic Visual Acuity (EVA) system are the gold standard for recognition acuity measurement in research settings. However, letters are not always appropriate for children. The Auckland Optotypes (TAO) are a new, open-access set of 10 pictograms available in regular and vanishing formats. We sought to assess feasibility of using both formats of TAO for measuring visual acuity (VA) in children using a Bayesian adaptive staircase, in a community setting. Methods: We tested 121 children (5–12 years old) with both formats of TAO, a handheld flipchart vision screener (Parr vision test), as well as the gold standard EVA. We measured feasibility of the three comparison tests in three ways. First, using limits of agreement (LoA) with EVA, second, calculating area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and finally, investigating trial-by-trial responses. Results: Agreement between tests was within test-retest reliability of EVA measures (LoA TAO regular = ±0.14, LoA TAO vanishing = ±0.15, LoA P arr = ±0.16 logMAR). TAO tests were highly effective at identifying children with vision impairment (AUC TAO regular = 0.96, AUC TAO vanishing = 0.95), whereas Parr was less effective (AUC P arr = 0.82). In 5–6 year old children there was an enhanced advantage of TAO (AUC TAO regular = 0.97, AUC TAO vanishing = 0.98) over Parr (AUC P arr = 0.75). Although each child completed 16 trials, approximately 10 trials were sufficient to achieve excellent LoA, and six trials sufficient for accurate screening. Conclusion: Threshold VA assessment and vision screening are feasible using both vanishing and regular formats of TAO.

AB - Purpose: Sloan letters displayed by the Electronic Visual Acuity (EVA) system are the gold standard for recognition acuity measurement in research settings. However, letters are not always appropriate for children. The Auckland Optotypes (TAO) are a new, open-access set of 10 pictograms available in regular and vanishing formats. We sought to assess feasibility of using both formats of TAO for measuring visual acuity (VA) in children using a Bayesian adaptive staircase, in a community setting. Methods: We tested 121 children (5–12 years old) with both formats of TAO, a handheld flipchart vision screener (Parr vision test), as well as the gold standard EVA. We measured feasibility of the three comparison tests in three ways. First, using limits of agreement (LoA) with EVA, second, calculating area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and finally, investigating trial-by-trial responses. Results: Agreement between tests was within test-retest reliability of EVA measures (LoA TAO regular = ±0.14, LoA TAO vanishing = ±0.15, LoA P arr = ±0.16 logMAR). TAO tests were highly effective at identifying children with vision impairment (AUC TAO regular = 0.96, AUC TAO vanishing = 0.95), whereas Parr was less effective (AUC P arr = 0.82). In 5–6 year old children there was an enhanced advantage of TAO (AUC TAO regular = 0.97, AUC TAO vanishing = 0.98) over Parr (AUC P arr = 0.75). Although each child completed 16 trials, approximately 10 trials were sufficient to achieve excellent LoA, and six trials sufficient for accurate screening. Conclusion: Threshold VA assessment and vision screening are feasible using both vanishing and regular formats of TAO.

KW - acuity

KW - agreement

KW - children

KW - optotypes

KW - psychophysics

KW - screening

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058887563&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/opo.12590

DO - 10.1111/opo.12590

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 596

EP - 608

JO - British Journal of Physiological Optics

JF - British Journal of Physiological Optics

SN - 0275-5408

IS - 6

ER -