(Re)Conceptualising the third face of power: Insights from Bourdieu and Foucault

Sadiya AKRAM, Guy Emerson, David MARSH

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The strength of Lukes’ third face of power is the recognition that agents can be influenced by structures and ideas in ways of which they are unaware. The weakness of Lukes’ position is that his consideration of the third face is underdeveloped. In this article, we argue that Bourdieu and Foucault’s work offer fruitful ways of exploring this ‘pre-conscious’ dimension. Using Bourdieu’s work, the core of any understanding of the third face is rooted in the relationship between the social field and the habitus, while, for Foucault, the focus is upon the construction of the subject and her preferences in relation to the ongoing production of power. We subsequently explore the differences between their positions
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)345-362
    Number of pages18
    JournalJournal of Political Power
    Volume8
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015

    Fingerprint

    social field

    Cite this

    @article{5987f4fc72f04255a7575d49ffb6c0ef,
    title = "(Re)Conceptualising the third face of power: Insights from Bourdieu and Foucault",
    abstract = "The strength of Lukes’ third face of power is the recognition that agents can be influenced by structures and ideas in ways of which they are unaware. The weakness of Lukes’ position is that his consideration of the third face is underdeveloped. In this article, we argue that Bourdieu and Foucault’s work offer fruitful ways of exploring this ‘pre-conscious’ dimension. Using Bourdieu’s work, the core of any understanding of the third face is rooted in the relationship between the social field and the habitus, while, for Foucault, the focus is upon the construction of the subject and her preferences in relation to the ongoing production of power. We subsequently explore the differences between their positions",
    keywords = "power, Lukes, Bourdieu, Foucault, pre-conscious",
    author = "Sadiya AKRAM and Guy Emerson and David MARSH",
    year = "2015",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1080/2158379X.2015.1095845",
    language = "English",
    volume = "8",
    pages = "345--362",
    journal = "Journal of Power",
    issn = "1754-0291",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "3",

    }

    (Re)Conceptualising the third face of power: Insights from Bourdieu and Foucault. / AKRAM, Sadiya; Emerson, Guy; MARSH, David.

    In: Journal of Political Power, Vol. 8, No. 3, 01.01.2015, p. 345-362.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - (Re)Conceptualising the third face of power: Insights from Bourdieu and Foucault

    AU - AKRAM, Sadiya

    AU - Emerson, Guy

    AU - MARSH, David

    PY - 2015/1/1

    Y1 - 2015/1/1

    N2 - The strength of Lukes’ third face of power is the recognition that agents can be influenced by structures and ideas in ways of which they are unaware. The weakness of Lukes’ position is that his consideration of the third face is underdeveloped. In this article, we argue that Bourdieu and Foucault’s work offer fruitful ways of exploring this ‘pre-conscious’ dimension. Using Bourdieu’s work, the core of any understanding of the third face is rooted in the relationship between the social field and the habitus, while, for Foucault, the focus is upon the construction of the subject and her preferences in relation to the ongoing production of power. We subsequently explore the differences between their positions

    AB - The strength of Lukes’ third face of power is the recognition that agents can be influenced by structures and ideas in ways of which they are unaware. The weakness of Lukes’ position is that his consideration of the third face is underdeveloped. In this article, we argue that Bourdieu and Foucault’s work offer fruitful ways of exploring this ‘pre-conscious’ dimension. Using Bourdieu’s work, the core of any understanding of the third face is rooted in the relationship between the social field and the habitus, while, for Foucault, the focus is upon the construction of the subject and her preferences in relation to the ongoing production of power. We subsequently explore the differences between their positions

    KW - power

    KW - Lukes

    KW - Bourdieu

    KW - Foucault

    KW - pre-conscious

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947069109&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/reconceptualising-third-face-power-insights-bourdieu-foucault

    U2 - 10.1080/2158379X.2015.1095845

    DO - 10.1080/2158379X.2015.1095845

    M3 - Article

    VL - 8

    SP - 345

    EP - 362

    JO - Journal of Power

    JF - Journal of Power

    SN - 1754-0291

    IS - 3

    ER -