Abstract
The strength of Lukes’ third face of power is the recognition that agents can be
influenced by structures and ideas in ways of which they are unaware. The
weakness of Lukes’ position is that his consideration of the third face is underdeveloped.
In this article, we argue that Bourdieu and Foucault’s work offer
fruitful ways of exploring this ‘pre-conscious’ dimension. Using Bourdieu’s
work, the core of any understanding of the third face is rooted in the relationship
between the social field and the habitus, while, for Foucault, the focus is
upon the construction of the subject and her preferences in relation to the ongoing
production of power. We subsequently explore the differences between their
positions
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 345-362 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Journal of Political Power |
Volume | 8 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2015 |