Reconciling Ecological and Democratic Values

Recent Perspectives on Ecological Democracy

David Schlosberg, Karin Bäckstrand, Jonathan Pickering

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The idea of ecological democracy is a promising one, a combination of two sets
of appealing core normative values – environmental concern and engagement
on the one hand, and democratic legitimacy and procedure on the other. Yet,
these two sets of values are quite different, and not so easily reconciled.
Theorists of ecological democracy have long struggled with this dual (and
duelling) set of promises, and have always had to address the obvious potential
for conflict between them. As Goodin (1992: 160) clearly laid out, long ago,
‘to advocate democracy is to advocate procedure, to advocate environmentalism is to advocate substantive outcomes: what guarantee can we have that
the former procedures will yield the latter outcome?’ There is no guarantee
that democracies will necessarily bring about ecological and sustainable ends,
and more authoritative processes of attaining those ends could undermine
democratic ideals and legitimacy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalEnvironmental Values
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

democracy
environmentalism
environmental values
Democracy

Cite this

@article{475fddeca19b4cb9907fa35b35fa5a9c,
title = "Reconciling Ecological and Democratic Values: Recent Perspectives on Ecological Democracy",
abstract = "The idea of ecological democracy is a promising one, a combination of two setsof appealing core normative values – environmental concern and engagementon the one hand, and democratic legitimacy and procedure on the other. Yet,these two sets of values are quite different, and not so easily reconciled.Theorists of ecological democracy have long struggled with this dual (andduelling) set of promises, and have always had to address the obvious potentialfor conflict between them. As Goodin (1992: 160) clearly laid out, long ago,‘to advocate democracy is to advocate procedure, to advocate environmentalism is to advocate substantive outcomes: what guarantee can we have thatthe former procedures will yield the latter outcome?’ There is no guaranteethat democracies will necessarily bring about ecological and sustainable ends,and more authoritative processes of attaining those ends could underminedemocratic ideals and legitimacy.",
keywords = "Ecological democracy, Deliberative democracy, Environmental democracy",
author = "David Schlosberg and Karin B{\"a}ckstrand and Jonathan Pickering",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "8",
doi = "10.3197/096327119x15445433913541",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "Environmental Values",
issn = "0963-2719",
publisher = "White Horse Press",
number = "1",

}

Reconciling Ecological and Democratic Values : Recent Perspectives on Ecological Democracy. / Schlosberg, David; Bäckstrand, Karin; Pickering, Jonathan.

In: Environmental Values, Vol. 28, No. 1, 08.01.2019, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reconciling Ecological and Democratic Values

T2 - Recent Perspectives on Ecological Democracy

AU - Schlosberg, David

AU - Bäckstrand, Karin

AU - Pickering, Jonathan

PY - 2019/1/8

Y1 - 2019/1/8

N2 - The idea of ecological democracy is a promising one, a combination of two setsof appealing core normative values – environmental concern and engagementon the one hand, and democratic legitimacy and procedure on the other. Yet,these two sets of values are quite different, and not so easily reconciled.Theorists of ecological democracy have long struggled with this dual (andduelling) set of promises, and have always had to address the obvious potentialfor conflict between them. As Goodin (1992: 160) clearly laid out, long ago,‘to advocate democracy is to advocate procedure, to advocate environmentalism is to advocate substantive outcomes: what guarantee can we have thatthe former procedures will yield the latter outcome?’ There is no guaranteethat democracies will necessarily bring about ecological and sustainable ends,and more authoritative processes of attaining those ends could underminedemocratic ideals and legitimacy.

AB - The idea of ecological democracy is a promising one, a combination of two setsof appealing core normative values – environmental concern and engagementon the one hand, and democratic legitimacy and procedure on the other. Yet,these two sets of values are quite different, and not so easily reconciled.Theorists of ecological democracy have long struggled with this dual (andduelling) set of promises, and have always had to address the obvious potentialfor conflict between them. As Goodin (1992: 160) clearly laid out, long ago,‘to advocate democracy is to advocate procedure, to advocate environmentalism is to advocate substantive outcomes: what guarantee can we have thatthe former procedures will yield the latter outcome?’ There is no guaranteethat democracies will necessarily bring about ecological and sustainable ends,and more authoritative processes of attaining those ends could underminedemocratic ideals and legitimacy.

KW - Ecological democracy

KW - Deliberative democracy

KW - Environmental democracy

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/reconciling-ecological-democratic-values-recent-perspectives-ecological-democracy

U2 - 10.3197/096327119x15445433913541

DO - 10.3197/096327119x15445433913541

M3 - Editorial

VL - 28

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Environmental Values

JF - Environmental Values

SN - 0963-2719

IS - 1

ER -