Record and recollection: Women's active citizenship and national archives

Kim Rubenstein, Andrew Henderson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Postmodern theories of the development of archival collections argue that archives created and administered under executive power often exclude voices and accounts outside the mainstream. These critiques are generally directed towards the absence of life experiences outside the purview of the central activities of the state. However, there is little empirical testing of how women's active contributions within the concerns of government activity are recorded. This article tracks two events, recorded in the oral histories of two women lawyers collected as part of the Trailblazing Women and the Law Project, through the records of the National Archives of Australia (NAA). Its purpose is to start investigating how well these women, who have been active citizens, are 'recorded' in the formal national memory. It highlights the importance of undertaking further research to determine how well the NAA, as a state-run archive, represents women's active citizenship in its telling of Australian legal history.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)98-124
Number of pages27
JournalLaw and History
Volume6
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Record and recollection: Women's active citizenship and national archives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this