Recruitment strategies for a clinical trial of community-based water therapy for osteoarthritis

Rachel Davey, Sarah Matthes Edwards, Tom Cochrane

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study compares the efficiency of two methods of recruitment into a randomised controlled trial examining the cost-effectiveness of water therapy for elderly people with lower limb osteoarthritis. The direct cost of recruiting patients via general practice was £27.66 per patient (1.1 personnel hours/patient). The cost per recruited patient from a local newspaper article was £2.72 (0.2 personnel hours/patient). The cost differential between the two recruitment methods was largely owing to poor administration practices, difficulties in accessing patient information, and difficulties in contacting patients from the general practice computer database.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)315-317
Number of pages3
JournalBritish Journal of General Practice
Volume53
Issue number489
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Osteoarthritis
Clinical Trials
Water
Costs and Cost Analysis
General Practice
Therapeutics
Newspapers
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Lower Extremity
Randomized Controlled Trials
Databases

Cite this

@article{c750dda8898642f782a172cdb9993324,
title = "Recruitment strategies for a clinical trial of community-based water therapy for osteoarthritis",
abstract = "This study compares the efficiency of two methods of recruitment into a randomised controlled trial examining the cost-effectiveness of water therapy for elderly people with lower limb osteoarthritis. The direct cost of recruiting patients via general practice was £27.66 per patient (1.1 personnel hours/patient). The cost per recruited patient from a local newspaper article was £2.72 (0.2 personnel hours/patient). The cost differential between the two recruitment methods was largely owing to poor administration practices, difficulties in accessing patient information, and difficulties in contacting patients from the general practice computer database.",
keywords = "Osteoarthritis, Patient recruitment, Randomised controlled trial",
author = "Rachel Davey and Edwards, {Sarah Matthes} and Tom Cochrane",
year = "2003",
month = "4",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "315--317",
journal = "Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners",
issn = "0960-1643",
publisher = "Royal College of General Practitioners",
number = "489",

}

Recruitment strategies for a clinical trial of community-based water therapy for osteoarthritis. / Davey, Rachel; Edwards, Sarah Matthes; Cochrane, Tom.

In: British Journal of General Practice, Vol. 53, No. 489, 01.04.2003, p. 315-317.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recruitment strategies for a clinical trial of community-based water therapy for osteoarthritis

AU - Davey, Rachel

AU - Edwards, Sarah Matthes

AU - Cochrane, Tom

PY - 2003/4/1

Y1 - 2003/4/1

N2 - This study compares the efficiency of two methods of recruitment into a randomised controlled trial examining the cost-effectiveness of water therapy for elderly people with lower limb osteoarthritis. The direct cost of recruiting patients via general practice was £27.66 per patient (1.1 personnel hours/patient). The cost per recruited patient from a local newspaper article was £2.72 (0.2 personnel hours/patient). The cost differential between the two recruitment methods was largely owing to poor administration practices, difficulties in accessing patient information, and difficulties in contacting patients from the general practice computer database.

AB - This study compares the efficiency of two methods of recruitment into a randomised controlled trial examining the cost-effectiveness of water therapy for elderly people with lower limb osteoarthritis. The direct cost of recruiting patients via general practice was £27.66 per patient (1.1 personnel hours/patient). The cost per recruited patient from a local newspaper article was £2.72 (0.2 personnel hours/patient). The cost differential between the two recruitment methods was largely owing to poor administration practices, difficulties in accessing patient information, and difficulties in contacting patients from the general practice computer database.

KW - Osteoarthritis

KW - Patient recruitment

KW - Randomised controlled trial

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037393525&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 315

EP - 317

JO - Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners

JF - Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners

SN - 0960-1643

IS - 489

ER -