Reducing anorexia nervosa stigma

an exploration of a social consensus intervention and the moderating effect of blameworthy attributions

Sarah Cassone, Elizabeth Rieger, Dimity A Crisp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Research suggests that blameworthy attributions towards individuals with anorexia nervosa are common, which in turn elicit more stigmatising attitudes towards those with the disorder. The social consensus approach has been found to reduce stigmatising attitudes in various domains and, as such, is a promising avenue to pursue for ameliorating stigma in anorexia nervosa. Aims: The present study primarily sought to investigate the effectiveness of a social consensus approach in reducing stigma towards individuals with anorexia nervosa. The study also examined if blameworthy attributions were associated with change in stigma. Method: An experimental design was employed, where female undergraduate students (N= 126) completed self-report measures that assessed anorexia nervosa stigma at baseline (Time 1) and 6-10 days after allocation to one of two conditions: social consensus and control (Time 2). Results: The social consensus intervention was more effective than the control condition in reducing stigmatising attitudes on measures assessing affective reactions (p= 0.025) and characteristics attributed to a target with anorexia nervosa (p < 0.001). Level of blame-based attributions did not moderate change in stigma. Conclusions: Results suggest that a social consensus intervention is promising irrespective of the endorsement of blameworthy attributions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Mental Health
Early online date2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Anorexia Nervosa
Consensus
Social Conditions
Self Report
Research Design
Students
Research

Cite this

@article{b2dd15c8ad304458bbbdeaffc3504785,
title = "Reducing anorexia nervosa stigma: an exploration of a social consensus intervention and the moderating effect of blameworthy attributions",
abstract = "Background: Research suggests that blameworthy attributions towards individuals with anorexia nervosa are common, which in turn elicit more stigmatising attitudes towards those with the disorder. The social consensus approach has been found to reduce stigmatising attitudes in various domains and, as such, is a promising avenue to pursue for ameliorating stigma in anorexia nervosa. Aims: The present study primarily sought to investigate the effectiveness of a social consensus approach in reducing stigma towards individuals with anorexia nervosa. The study also examined if blameworthy attributions were associated with change in stigma. Method: An experimental design was employed, where female undergraduate students (N= 126) completed self-report measures that assessed anorexia nervosa stigma at baseline (Time 1) and 6-10 days after allocation to one of two conditions: social consensus and control (Time 2). Results: The social consensus intervention was more effective than the control condition in reducing stigmatising attitudes on measures assessing affective reactions (p= 0.025) and characteristics attributed to a target with anorexia nervosa (p < 0.001). Level of blame-based attributions did not moderate change in stigma. Conclusions: Results suggest that a social consensus intervention is promising irrespective of the endorsement of blameworthy attributions.",
author = "Sarah Cassone and Elizabeth Rieger and Crisp, {Dimity A}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/09638237.2019.1581326",
language = "English",
pages = "1--7",
journal = "Journal of Mental Health",
issn = "0963-8237",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",

}

Reducing anorexia nervosa stigma : an exploration of a social consensus intervention and the moderating effect of blameworthy attributions. / Cassone, Sarah; Rieger, Elizabeth; Crisp, Dimity A.

In: Journal of Mental Health, 2019, p. 1-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reducing anorexia nervosa stigma

T2 - an exploration of a social consensus intervention and the moderating effect of blameworthy attributions

AU - Cassone, Sarah

AU - Rieger, Elizabeth

AU - Crisp, Dimity A

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Background: Research suggests that blameworthy attributions towards individuals with anorexia nervosa are common, which in turn elicit more stigmatising attitudes towards those with the disorder. The social consensus approach has been found to reduce stigmatising attitudes in various domains and, as such, is a promising avenue to pursue for ameliorating stigma in anorexia nervosa. Aims: The present study primarily sought to investigate the effectiveness of a social consensus approach in reducing stigma towards individuals with anorexia nervosa. The study also examined if blameworthy attributions were associated with change in stigma. Method: An experimental design was employed, where female undergraduate students (N= 126) completed self-report measures that assessed anorexia nervosa stigma at baseline (Time 1) and 6-10 days after allocation to one of two conditions: social consensus and control (Time 2). Results: The social consensus intervention was more effective than the control condition in reducing stigmatising attitudes on measures assessing affective reactions (p= 0.025) and characteristics attributed to a target with anorexia nervosa (p < 0.001). Level of blame-based attributions did not moderate change in stigma. Conclusions: Results suggest that a social consensus intervention is promising irrespective of the endorsement of blameworthy attributions.

AB - Background: Research suggests that blameworthy attributions towards individuals with anorexia nervosa are common, which in turn elicit more stigmatising attitudes towards those with the disorder. The social consensus approach has been found to reduce stigmatising attitudes in various domains and, as such, is a promising avenue to pursue for ameliorating stigma in anorexia nervosa. Aims: The present study primarily sought to investigate the effectiveness of a social consensus approach in reducing stigma towards individuals with anorexia nervosa. The study also examined if blameworthy attributions were associated with change in stigma. Method: An experimental design was employed, where female undergraduate students (N= 126) completed self-report measures that assessed anorexia nervosa stigma at baseline (Time 1) and 6-10 days after allocation to one of two conditions: social consensus and control (Time 2). Results: The social consensus intervention was more effective than the control condition in reducing stigmatising attitudes on measures assessing affective reactions (p= 0.025) and characteristics attributed to a target with anorexia nervosa (p < 0.001). Level of blame-based attributions did not moderate change in stigma. Conclusions: Results suggest that a social consensus intervention is promising irrespective of the endorsement of blameworthy attributions.

UR - https://tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09638237.2019.1581326

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/reducing-anorexia-nervosa-stigma-exploration-social-consensus-intervention-moderating-effect-blamewo

U2 - 10.1080/09638237.2019.1581326

DO - 10.1080/09638237.2019.1581326

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 7

JO - Journal of Mental Health

JF - Journal of Mental Health

SN - 0963-8237

ER -