Reframing doctoral examination as teaching

Vijay Kumar, Elke STRACKE

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Doctoral examiners judge the quality of a thesis and give the student assessment feedback if the student fails to reach certain goals. This paper investigates if and how examiners take on the evaluator or teaching role. We analysed doctoral examination reports from three disciplines. Most examiners provided assessment and feedback, but this often took the form of summative assessment. Such assessment does not include expectations or guidance on how a candidate can fix critical issues in their thesis. Examiners make choices for assessment or feedback based on individual preferences rather than disciplinary differences or institutional guidelines. Longer reports had more feedback, indicating the examiner was more engaged in the process. While their role is to assess, we argue that an examiner must also teach by giving the student feedback so they can develop and close the gap between their current and expected performance. Only then is assessment for learning realised
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)219-227
Number of pages9
JournalInnovations in Education and Teaching International
Volume55
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

examiner
examination
Teaching
student
Reframing
candidacy
learning
performance

Cite this

@article{f30f1aebfe014ce5a89c54ac6cf56f4d,
title = "Reframing doctoral examination as teaching",
abstract = "Doctoral examiners judge the quality of a thesis and give the student assessment feedback if the student fails to reach certain goals. This paper investigates if and how examiners take on the evaluator or teaching role. We analysed doctoral examination reports from three disciplines. Most examiners provided assessment and feedback, but this often took the form of summative assessment. Such assessment does not include expectations or guidance on how a candidate can fix critical issues in their thesis. Examiners make choices for assessment or feedback based on individual preferences rather than disciplinary differences or institutional guidelines. Longer reports had more feedback, indicating the examiner was more engaged in the process. While their role is to assess, we argue that an examiner must also teach by giving the student feedback so they can develop and close the gap between their current and expected performance. Only then is assessment for learning realised",
keywords = "Assessment for learning, developmental, doctoral examination, examination reports, feedback, formative assessment, summative assessment",
author = "Vijay Kumar and Elke STRACKE",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/14703297.2017.1285715",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "219--227",
journal = "Innovations in Education and Training International",
issn = "1355-8005",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

Reframing doctoral examination as teaching. / Kumar, Vijay; STRACKE, Elke.

In: Innovations in Education and Teaching International, Vol. 55, No. 2, 2018, p. 219-227.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reframing doctoral examination as teaching

AU - Kumar, Vijay

AU - STRACKE, Elke

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Doctoral examiners judge the quality of a thesis and give the student assessment feedback if the student fails to reach certain goals. This paper investigates if and how examiners take on the evaluator or teaching role. We analysed doctoral examination reports from three disciplines. Most examiners provided assessment and feedback, but this often took the form of summative assessment. Such assessment does not include expectations or guidance on how a candidate can fix critical issues in their thesis. Examiners make choices for assessment or feedback based on individual preferences rather than disciplinary differences or institutional guidelines. Longer reports had more feedback, indicating the examiner was more engaged in the process. While their role is to assess, we argue that an examiner must also teach by giving the student feedback so they can develop and close the gap between their current and expected performance. Only then is assessment for learning realised

AB - Doctoral examiners judge the quality of a thesis and give the student assessment feedback if the student fails to reach certain goals. This paper investigates if and how examiners take on the evaluator or teaching role. We analysed doctoral examination reports from three disciplines. Most examiners provided assessment and feedback, but this often took the form of summative assessment. Such assessment does not include expectations or guidance on how a candidate can fix critical issues in their thesis. Examiners make choices for assessment or feedback based on individual preferences rather than disciplinary differences or institutional guidelines. Longer reports had more feedback, indicating the examiner was more engaged in the process. While their role is to assess, we argue that an examiner must also teach by giving the student feedback so they can develop and close the gap between their current and expected performance. Only then is assessment for learning realised

KW - Assessment for learning

KW - developmental

KW - doctoral examination

KW - examination reports

KW - feedback

KW - formative assessment

KW - summative assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010977221&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/reframing-doctoral-examination-teaching

U2 - 10.1080/14703297.2017.1285715

DO - 10.1080/14703297.2017.1285715

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 219

EP - 227

JO - Innovations in Education and Training International

JF - Innovations in Education and Training International

SN - 1355-8005

IS - 2

ER -